Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-20-2009, 09:38 PM
JordaanDMC-12's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 766
Exclamation Trap Oxidizer Question

Hey everyone, again a new thread sorry don't mean to post them one after another, but it was off topic of the other one.

Anywho, I didn't realize what a trap oxidizer was and until now decided to read about and go check my 1985 300D Turbo California. I was reading the old ones are football-like and so I went to check it out. I'm pretty sure mine has the old one. First thing tomorrow i'm calling up Mercedes to have them run the vin just in case and setting up a time to get that s*** swapped out. My question is:

How much damage could have been caused by running the old one for so long? The car has 148,000 miles and was also running without an airfilter for a few months me thinking everything is all peachy.... I'm learning more and more about these cars everyday....it's actually pretty cool! thanks everyone!

__________________
2007 BMW 328XI
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-20-2009, 09:44 PM
jammybugger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Francisco,CA
Posts: 124
Shouldnt have caused any damage as its downwind of the turbo...running without an air filter is more dangerous I think!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-20-2009, 09:52 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The TrapOx is before the turbo.

If any damage was done to the turbo from ceramic material breaking off, MB will replace the turbo for free when they do the recall.
Attached Thumbnails
Trap Oxidizer Question-ca-trap-ox-0m617.jpg  

Last edited by whunter; 01-21-2009 at 04:00 PM. Reason: attached picture
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-20-2009, 09:55 PM
JordaanDMC-12's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 766
yeah wasn't too pleased when I found out about that lol. Ok woot, so tomorrow will be junkyard and then Mercedes Benz!!! I'll ask them to see how much that O-ring will be to replace. I'm excited! Also, will there be an improvement in anything once the trap oxidizer has been replaced?
__________________
2007 BMW 328XI
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-20-2009, 10:09 PM
Registered Hack
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,642
you should call your local dealer with your VIN in hand before you waste your time. They will tell you if it has been performed already.

Or you can look up the part number in Diesel Discussion and check the numbers on the 'football' to identify which you have. It was most likely performed.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-20-2009, 10:10 PM
Registered Hack
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,642
Quote:
Originally Posted by JordaanDMC-12 View Post
Also, will there be an improvement in anything once the trap oxidizer has been replaced?

there is still debate.

but only if your current unit is clogged with soot.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-20-2009, 10:34 PM
theo3000's Avatar
Leadfoot
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Apple Valley CA
Posts: 300
Quote:
Originally Posted by jt20 View Post
you should call your local dealer with your VIN in hand before you waste your time. They will tell you if it has been performed already.

Or you can look up the part number in Diesel Discussion and check the numbers on the 'football' to identify which you have. It was most likely performed.
Ditto. The replacement looks like a football too, so unless you really know what to look for, you're making a big assumption thinking you have the original oxidizer.

I did the search for you. From http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/diesel-discussion/49978-trap-oxidizer-85-td.html#post290704

"The original trap oxidizer was part number 617-142-00-94, it was replaced with an oxidation catalyst p/n 617-142-02-94."
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-21-2009, 12:42 AM
Jeremy5848's Avatar
Registered Biodiesel User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sonoma Wine Country
Posts: 8,402
Interesting. My trap cat (the dealer confirms replacement of the trap ox with the later trap cat) carries part number A 126 490 34 14. (1985 300D-T, W123, OM617.952). Wonder what the difference (if any) is. Since the trap cat has been temporarily replaced with a test pipe, the point is moot but I'm curious anyway.

Jeremy
__________________

"Buster" in the '95

Our all-Diesel family
1996 E300D (W210) . .338,000 miles Wife's car
2005 E320 CDI . . 113,000 miles My car
Santa Rosa population 176,762 (2022)
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . 627,762
"Oh lord won't you buy me a Mercedes Benz."
-- Janis Joplin, October 1, 1970
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-21-2009, 02:47 PM
ImBroke's Avatar
Diesel way of Life
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cleveland, NY
Posts: 2,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by theo3000 View Post
"The original trap oxidizer was part number 617-142-00-94, it was replaced with an oxidation catalyst p/n 617-142-02-94."
Well crap, I was going by Jeremy's part number. I know mine starts with 617, but don't remember the rest. Should have written it down. Thanks for posting the part number, now I have to find out for sure which one I have.
__________________
79 MB 280 SEL Euro 133k
77 MB 450SL 154k
05 Mustang GT Vert (3) 104k
12 TSX Wagon Tech (66k) (192k)
06 Subaru Outback base (135k) 164k
16 Acura MDX (109k) 111k
18 Silverado 2500 LTZ Midnight (212) 56k
97 Ford Ranger 163k
11 RAV4 154k
01 Escape 173k
04 Honda Pilot 292k
1967 Mustang (Resto Project)
1968 Mustang (Parts Bin)
00 Ford Ranger 124k
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-21-2009, 04:45 PM
Jeremy5848's Avatar
Registered Biodiesel User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sonoma Wine Country
Posts: 8,402
Please let us know what you find out. The 1985 300SD also had the trap cat in California versions; I wonder if that is where the 126 number came from? Ah, I have it, from EPC:

1985 300D-T (W123, OM617.952)
A 617 142 00 94 "Soot filter"
"replaced by"
A 617 142 02 94 "The old part must no longer be installed in this place"
"replaced by"
A 126 490 34 14 "For California from model year 1985"

So the 126 part number is simply the latest version. The first part number is probably the "trap oxidizer." The third part number (the 126 version) is definitely a "trap catalyst." The middle one is "I don't know."

Jeremy
__________________

"Buster" in the '95

Our all-Diesel family
1996 E300D (W210) . .338,000 miles Wife's car
2005 E320 CDI . . 113,000 miles My car
Santa Rosa population 176,762 (2022)
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . 627,762
"Oh lord won't you buy me a Mercedes Benz."
-- Janis Joplin, October 1, 1970
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-21-2009, 04:50 PM
DeliveryValve's Avatar
Chairman of my Benz
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Central California
Posts: 4,159
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeremy5848 View Post
I.... Since the trap cat has been temporarily replaced with a test pipe, the point is moot but I'm curious anyway.

Jeremy
Why is it temporarily replaced? Why not be a permanent fixture.
__________________
1983 123.133 California
- GreaseCar Veg System


Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-21-2009, 09:03 PM
Registered Hack
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,642
legality
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-21-2009, 09:50 PM
Jim B.'s Avatar
Who's flying this thing ?
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: N. California./ N. Nevada
Posts: 3,611
There was a "Secret" recall for this by Mercedes Benz, which was always free (at first, anyway) and still exists so far as I am aware.

How it's done and paid for varies individual dealer to individual dealer, but the VERY lucky people got their ENTIRE EXHAUST SYSTEM REPLACED FOR FREE at the Mercedes Benz dealer that performed the recall work, sometimes.
__________________
1991 560 SEC AMG, 199k <---- 300 hp 10:1 ECE euro HV ...

1995 E 420, 170k "The Red Plum" (sold)

2015 BMW 535i xdrive awd Stage 1 DINAN, 6k, <----364 hp

1967 Mercury Cougar, 49k

2013 Jaguar XF, 20k <----340 hp Supercharged, All Wheel Drive (sold)
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-22-2009, 05:24 AM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Only on 86-87 models because the OxCat was relocated to under the body. 85 got only the OxCat replacement and the turbo, if it was damaged by TrapOx failure.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-25-2009, 07:19 PM
ImBroke's Avatar
Diesel way of Life
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cleveland, NY
Posts: 2,230
I have verified my part number to include the dreaded 00.. Great. Now to write down the VIN, and see if they will entertain the recall.

__________________
79 MB 280 SEL Euro 133k
77 MB 450SL 154k
05 Mustang GT Vert (3) 104k
12 TSX Wagon Tech (66k) (192k)
06 Subaru Outback base (135k) 164k
16 Acura MDX (109k) 111k
18 Silverado 2500 LTZ Midnight (212) 56k
97 Ford Ranger 163k
11 RAV4 154k
01 Escape 173k
04 Honda Pilot 292k
1967 Mustang (Resto Project)
1968 Mustang (Parts Bin)
00 Ford Ranger 124k
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page