|
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
I don't figure they'd put the "BLUETEC" label on the trunk badge of truth if it didn't have urea injection. And so there's definitely E320 bluetecs in the states.
Since I'm not a fan of "so quiet you can't tell it's a diesel" and not a fan of urea injection and not a fan of any additional electronic complications, I'd go for the CDI instead of the newer model every time. But that's just me. I tend to suspect older models are almost in every case more long-term "million miles" capable than the next replacement will be. Another point in favor of the older design to me but others have complete confidence in the new stuff. |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
http://portland.craigslist.org/mlt/ctd/1207483187.html http://portland.craigslist.org/wsc/ctd/1196728212.html http://seattle.craigslist.org/see/ctd/1208762734.html |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
[QUOTE=Cr from Texas;2218459]
Quote:
__________________
Charles 1983 300D, bought new, 215k+ miles, donated to Purple Hearts veterans charity but I have parts for sale: http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/mercedes-benz-cars-sale/296386-fs-1-owner-83-mb-300d-turbo-rebuild-parts.html |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
For like the 5th time, there are NO E320 Bluetec's in the USA with AdBlue (urea injection) up through the 09 model year. Zip, Nada, Nein.
That does not mean there aren't E320 Bluetecs WITHOUT AdBlue available. There are GL, ML and R320 Bluetecs WITH AdBlue in the US that have been avail for a year or two. NO E's. I would guess that getting rid of SBC would be a hardware and software nightmare.
__________________
Terry Allison N. Calif. & Boca Chica, Panama 09' E320 Bluetec 77k (USA) 09' Hyundai Santa Fe Diesel 48k (S.A.) |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
AdBlue hasn't been used in the 211 yet, at least in the US. The technology has been in development for a few years. I did a little research and it looks like MB will use the AdBlue system in the W212 when it's released here later this year. To meet Bin 5 standards, it has to use AdBlue. The 2009 does not use AdBlue is only Bin 8 compliant, according to MBUSA. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Dale http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g1...MG_2277sig.jpg 1990 300D 2.5 Turbo -155k 2000 E430 - 103k 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee Ecodiesel 4x4 - 11k 2014 VW Passat TDI SE - 7k Bro's Diesel 2006 E320 CDI - 128k Pop's Benz Pre-glow - A moment of silence in honor of Rudolph Diesel |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Terry Allison N. Calif. & Boca Chica, Panama 09' E320 Bluetec 77k (USA) 09' Hyundai Santa Fe Diesel 48k (S.A.) Last edited by TMAllison; 06-07-2009 at 07:12 PM. |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Mercedes introduced AdBlue in the Fall of 2008. The SUV's R 320 BlueTEC, ML 320 BlueTEC and GL 320 BlueTEC are the first first diesel models with AdBlue injection.
The rest of the BlueTEC line up still had NAC+SCR were only 45 state legal. Here is a piece on how BlueTEC works. Quote:
__________________
1983 123.133 California - GreaseCar Veg System |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Which is better? Who knows.
But all things being equal as possible, I would be a buyer of an '06 CDI. Because of the I-6 configuration. I would wait for the lowest mileage southern or southwestern state '06 CDI that I could find. |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
opp's i f*cked up, wow i feel mega retarded:p anyway my votes on the real diesel(06 I6 CDi)
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for all the input, everybody. I really didn't mean to start a major argument. I appreciate all the positive input. I will discuss all this with my MBZ mechanic. As always, THEY are the ones who see these cars on a frequent basis and know the good and bad.
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Anyway, I would have already bought an 06 CDI but I'm concerned about the braking system. From what I've read, these can be dangerous to do DIY work on.
__________________
Charles 1983 300D, bought new, 215k+ miles, donated to Purple Hearts veterans charity but I have parts for sale: http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/showthread.php?t=296386 |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Confirm procedure before using as I am stating that from memory and could be forgetting a step.......
__________________
Terry Allison N. Calif. & Boca Chica, Panama 09' E320 Bluetec 77k (USA) 09' Hyundai Santa Fe Diesel 48k (S.A.) |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Mom has a 07 Jeep grand cherokee with the Merc v6 3.0l diesl i must say it is phenominal at towing. I test drove the I6 vs the V6 diesesls side by side when the v6 first came out and the V6 is much faster or at least it feels that way. I vote I6 for simplicity but if you have the money i wouldn't hesitate for the V6. Remember VW, Audi, Jeep are all using versions of the V6 diesel engine now, parts shouldn't be too hard to come by in the distant future.
__________________
1987 300D 180k 1985 300SD 330k Helga 1992 300D Lola 269k- Sold 1986 325 coupe Bessie >300k Original engine(ODO Broke) sold 2006 2500HD Druamax Linda- Tows boat and looks pretty in garage thats about it |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
If I recall correctly from reading info outside this forum, the 2007 model was not urea injected, but 2008 and newer are, but I could be wrong. Does it really matter anyway?
I agree generally what's been said here about the comparison. I've driven a number of CDI's and an 09 Bluetec. Power wise they seemed about the same. I did like the idle sound of the Bluetec better though. No doubt it's still a diesel (to a knowledgeable ear), but it sounds a lot smoother than the older I6. I didn't have any problems with the 7-speed transmission either. If you don't pay attention, you really can't tell if you have 5 or 7 gears. But no doubt the I6 would be easier to work on. However the glow plugs are still known to break off in that engine. I don't know about the V6 if it still has those fragile glow plugs. Anybody know? And needless to say the Bluetec is much cleaner which means no exhaust smell whatsoever. The older CDI's and TDI's you can still smell them, though it's not too bad and it's a chemical smell rather than a "smoky" smell.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual) Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL |
Bookmarks |
|
|