|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
W124 Fan Clutch Shot
It keeps spinning after I shut off the engine and makes a nasty grinding/catching sound when it does finally stop.
I did a search and have read several threads but they all just confused me. What is the best course of action? Should I upgrade to the plastic fan? If so, what car was this on originally? I just bought the direct replacement for my clutch on fleabay. Can I bolt on a plastic fan to that clutch? I really did try to figure this out without starting another thread but they all ran together and just confused me more.
__________________
1993 W124 300D -297K on the clock as I type this. Last edited by i-osprey; 09-18-2009 at 02:34 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
I replaced mine recently too. I recommend keeping your original fan and just installing the new clutch.
__________________
1993 W124 300D 2.5L Turbo, OM602.962 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier, 2.4L DOHC 2002 Ford Explorer, 4.0L SOHC 2005 Toyota Prius, 1.5L http://www.fuelly.com/sig-us/40601.png |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I thought you couldn't get clutches for the metal fanwheels anymore
I'd reccomend you get the clutch and fanwheel from a 606 engine. -Jason
__________________
1991 350SDL. 230,000 miles (new motor @ 150,000). Blown head gasket Tesla Model 3. 205,000 miles. Been to 48 states! Past: A fleet of VW TDIs.... including a V10,a Dieselgate Passat, and 2 ECOdiesels. 2014 Cadillac ELR 2013 Fiat 500E. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Are there any tricks/pitfalls in this repair I should be aware of?
__________________
1993 W124 300D -297K on the clock as I type this. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
I got one from Importec a few months ago.
__________________
1993 W124 300D 2.5L Turbo, OM602.962 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier, 2.4L DOHC 2002 Ford Explorer, 4.0L SOHC 2005 Toyota Prius, 1.5L http://www.fuelly.com/sig-us/40601.png |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
I only replaced the clutch. The radiator fan plastic housing is very easy to remove and once you do, most everything is easy to get to.
__________________
1993 W124 300D 2.5L Turbo, OM602.962 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier, 2.4L DOHC 2002 Ford Explorer, 4.0L SOHC 2005 Toyota Prius, 1.5L http://www.fuelly.com/sig-us/40601.png |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I read somewhere on here that you need a special tool to remove the clutch.
Did you experience this?
__________________
1993 W124 300D -297K on the clock as I type this. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
No. You can hold a fan blade and use a ratchet to turn the bolt. Only one bolt holds the clutch to the pump shaft. Reinstalling the fan and clutch to the pump shaft is where a tool is sometimes used. I just used a breaker bar against the fan belt to keep the fan pulley from turning when I tightened the bolt back up. Using the breaker bar to push on the belt will keep it from spinning while tightening.
The 602 is shorter then the 6 cylinder version so we have more room under the hood to work with.
__________________
1993 W124 300D 2.5L Turbo, OM602.962 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier, 2.4L DOHC 2002 Ford Explorer, 4.0L SOHC 2005 Toyota Prius, 1.5L http://www.fuelly.com/sig-us/40601.png |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
That's good to hear.
Thank you.
__________________
1993 W124 300D -297K on the clock as I type this. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
According to gsxr, 606 fan in a 124/603 can have clearance problems.
No such problems in a 126 or 140 with 603. Sixto 87 300D Last edited by sixto; 09-19-2009 at 07:36 PM. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Stick with the old aluminum fan IMO.
While it's out, clean and polish it well, I also sprayed mine with a high-quality teflon coating.
__________________
Gone to the dark side - Jeff |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
How did you polish yours? Mine was oxidized but if you good way to do it, I'll take it back out and polish it.
__________________
1993 W124 300D 2.5L Turbo, OM602.962 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier, 2.4L DOHC 2002 Ford Explorer, 4.0L SOHC 2005 Toyota Prius, 1.5L http://www.fuelly.com/sig-us/40601.png |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
I did it by hand, more cleaned it up and polished lightly to smooth the surface and create less drag, thus the teflon coating. I believe that it has a better airfoil shape and better surface finish as well as thinner material, all IMO should make it more efficient than the plastic fan (which weighs slightly less, but that doesn't affect power/efficiency in any measurable way).
I have a buffer for this stuff, but am afraid I could disturb the balance of the blades if I removed any significant amount of metal, which would of course be bad.
__________________
Gone to the dark side - Jeff |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
That's an interesting aerodynamics question - does a smooth or less smooth surface move more air?
Sixto 87 300D |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Smooth should move more air, and an airfoil shape should move it more efficiently. Smooth should also have less drag in most cases.
A rough surface will create more turbulance which (theoretically) will reduce the effectiveness of the wing/blade. I think that the change from cast alloy to molded plastic was simply an economic decision. The same reason that the mirror bracket was a magnesium-alloy in the early 124s, and zink in the later 124s.
__________________
Gone to the dark side - Jeff Last edited by babymog; 09-19-2009 at 10:39 PM. |
Bookmarks |
|
|