Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 10-04-2009, 11:24 PM
Craig
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by compu_85 View Post
Yup, they've even got airbags for 'cycles now too

-J
Sad, but true.

Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-04-2009, 11:52 PM
Sev's Avatar
Sev Sev is offline
Infractions: 99/99 (999)
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,462
it's an interesting hypocrisy to find that some of the same people who believe that you shouldn't modify your w123 out of the original factory specs because the german engineers who built these cars know more than we do, also disagree with the safety features the same german engineers installed in newer model mercedes'

in other words, they use the 'german engineering' to suit their argument when they don't like a modification, but when it comes to safety features, they can do without the engineering
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-05-2009, 05:48 AM
Craig
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
In my case, the argument doesn't have anything to do with 'german engineering,' there are plenty of German cars that I wouldn't be interested in owning (including any Benz later than 1985).
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 10-05-2009, 02:10 PM
Sev's Avatar
Sev Sev is offline
Infractions: 99/99 (999)
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig View Post
In my case, the argument doesn't have anything to do with 'german engineering,' there are plenty of German cars that I wouldn't be interested in owning (including any Benz later than 1985).
ah, so 83-85 w201's suit you? because that was the last chassis (along with the w124) that mercedes said they would over-engineer.

another irrationality that mercedes owners commit: they love their particular cars' chassis so much, that they couldn't fathom buying another mercedes built after their chassis' production date ended, for reason.

right craig? craig forgot that the w201 was built before '85, and is built far better than a w123 in every sense and respect.

disclaimer: i own three w201's, one w123, and one w124
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 10-05-2009, 06:16 PM
disqo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: High Point, NC
Posts: 581
Part ID

My car has ABS that has been struggling lately. I think the problem might be with the computer. This was in the passenger footwell. Do you think this is the ABS "brain"?
Thanks,
Shane
Attached Thumbnails
Safety First - but not for US?-picture-002.jpg  
__________________
1985 Euro 300TD Turbo
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 10-05-2009, 06:22 PM
Craig
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Sorry, I have no interest in either a W201 or W124. I've ridden in both, too little styling and too many silly gadgets (i.e., too 1980s-ish, the decade that brought us disco). I will actually consider buying one for my daughter when she starts driving next year if I can find a decent driver that's not a complete POS (for all the same reasons that I wouldn't drive one myself). Honestly, they're both probably safer than a W123 for a new driver and I won't feel bad if a W201/124 gets abused.

My 1985 cut-off date is based on the last year of the W123, the last benz chassis I will drive. I forgot all about the W201/124 when I wrote that.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 10-05-2009, 06:39 PM
Benchracer Tribe
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by disqo View Post
My car has ABS that has been struggling lately. I think the problem might be with the computer. This was in the passenger footwell. Do you think this is the ABS "brain"?
Thanks,
Shane
If that is the case, I swear I have seen those boxes in Volvos with ABS. Sure makes you think... alternative J/Y sources?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig View Post
(i.e., too 1980s-ish, the decade that brought us disco).
I always thought disco started in mid-70s or thereabouts.
__________________
Your TACH may have a loose connection...I was wondering why your mechanic would be dead one minute then flopping around the next... PanzerSD

i am inspired. i will replace my windsheild... with an intercooler. swedishK
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 10-05-2009, 06:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Alexandria, Virginia
Posts: 5,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by disqo View Post
My car has ABS that has been struggling lately. I think the problem might be with the computer. This was in the passenger footwell. Do you think this is the ABS "brain"?
Thanks,
Shane
That looks just like the one here out of the Euro 300D, except on this one label is yellow. But it has the same part # as the one in your PM.

Happy Motoring, Mark
__________________
DrDKW
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 10-05-2009, 07:30 PM
Craig
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalek View Post
I always thought disco started in mid-70s or thereabouts.
Maybe, but I don't remember much of the 70s.

I guess disco really became mainstream after "Saturday Night Fever" in 1977, but it was easy to ignore until about 1980. For a while after that, the only pop music on the radio was disco and country (I'm still not sure which was worse). I can't think of anything from the 80s that I miss, it was even the beginning of horrible TV shows.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 10-05-2009, 08:45 PM
bustedbenz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Valle Crucis, NC
Posts: 2,283
Even if modern airbags are a good safety feature, I have *no* interest in having a 20 year old one exploding into my face. I'll take my chances on the seat belts doing their job unassisted.

There's a reason that laws preventing children from riding in the front seat appeared a few short years after airbags did. There's a reason that a lot of early airbag wreck stories ended in "my worst injuries were from getting beat up by the air bag" -- the early ones were just about brutal during their deployment.

Add to that the uncertainty of a twenty year old (ridiculously expensive) computer to fire the thing and 20 year old crash sensors... I feel safer without the thing in my w126. (We removed it a few years ago.) If I had a new car that was meant to have them, sure, I'd be grateful they were there and feel safer because of them. But I categorically don't want to have one of the 'early' ones going off in my face. Even if I'm over-reacting to the danger of the things, I just don't like the idea of them and the car is a tank even without them.
__________________


~Michael S.~
Past cars:

1986 300SDL
1987 300SDL
1982 240D
1982 300SD


Current:

1987 300SDL
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 10-06-2009, 10:46 AM
SwampYankee's Avatar
New England Hick
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 1,501
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yak View Post

Remember the motorized the shoulder belt?
I had them in my Escort wagon, used to hit my head on it constantly when getting out. No, I never learned.
__________________

1980 300TD-China Blue/Blue MBTex-2nd Owner, 107K (Alt Blau) OBK #15
'06 Chevy Tahoe Z71 (for the wife & 4 kids, current mule) '03 Honda Odyssey (son #1's ride, reluctantly) '99 GMC Suburban (255K+ miles, semi-retired mule) 21' SeaRay Seville (summer escape pod)
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 10-06-2009, 11:08 AM
babymog's Avatar
Loose Cannon - No Balls
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Northeast Indiana
Posts: 10,765
The Europeans got what we in the industry referred to as "face bags", airbags designed to protect a belted occupant.

Here in the regulation-happy US, Diane Steed (then head of the NHTSA) was heavily pushing mandatory "passive restraints", which included airbags designed to protect an un-belted occupant, even though we were required by law to be belted. Hmm.

Anyway, the European "face-bags" didn't meet our requirements, but in my opinion are much better for those of us who wear our seatbelts. One of the tests I watched involved a Mercedes 124 without a driver's door (for illustration) driving along while the face-bag deployed, and it didn't even knock the driver's hands from the wheel as he drove along un-daunted.

I've been hit by an American bag, they should be illegal IMO.
__________________

Gone to the dark side

- Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 10-06-2009, 11:19 AM
okyoureabeast's Avatar
Rogue T Tolerant
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North America
Posts: 1,675
Quote:
Originally Posted by babymog View Post
The Europeans got what we in the industry referred to as "face bags", airbags designed to protect a belted occupant.

Here in the regulation-happy US, Diane Steed (then head of the NHTSA) was heavily pushing mandatory "passive restraints", which included airbags designed to protect an un-belted occupant, even though we were required by law to be belted. Hmm.

Anyway, the European "face-bags" didn't meet our requirements, but in my opinion are much better for those of us who wear our seatbelts. One of the tests I watched involved a Mercedes 124 without a driver's door (for illustration) driving along while the face-bag deployed, and it didn't even knock the driver's hands from the wheel as he drove along un-daunted.

I've been hit by an American bag, they should be illegal IMO.
It's odd to me that Americans were historically low users of seatbelts.

I don't feel comfortable in a car without a seatbelt. If I'm driving my car even a short distance I'll buckle up.

Air bags should be there to keep your face from doing a wicked whip lash, not as an alternative to using a seat belt.
__________________
-Typos courtesy of my mobile phone.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 10-06-2009, 11:27 AM
compu_85's Avatar
Cruisin on Electric Ave.
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: La Conner, WA
Posts: 5,234
Quote:
Originally Posted by babymog View Post
...Here in the regulation-happy US, Diane Steed (then head of the NHTSA) was heavily pushing mandatory "passive restraints", which included airbags designed to protect an un-belted occupant, even though we were required by law to be belted. Hmm.
That's also why my 91 and 92 Jettas both had "automatic" seatbelts... both front seat's shoulder belts were attached to the door and if the driver's side was not buckled the car would not start. The dashboard includes a large knee bar, like airbag equipped US spec Mercedes, so that you don't have to attach to the lap belt (yah right!).

IMHO the standard belts work better because the anchors are further back, bringing them closer to your body.

The power of a pre 1998 airbag!

-Jason
__________________
1991 350SDL. 230,000 miles (new motor @ 150,000). Blown head gasket

Tesla Model 3. 205,000 miles. Been to 48 states!
Past: A fleet of VW TDIs.... including a V10,a Dieselgate Passat, and 2 ECOdiesels.
2014 Cadillac ELR
2013 Fiat 500E.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 10-06-2009, 11:29 AM
babymog's Avatar
Loose Cannon - No Balls
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Northeast Indiana
Posts: 10,765
A friend of mine had these on his '75 VW Rabbit.

Quote:
Originally Posted by compu_85 View Post
That's also why my 91 and 92 Jettas both had "automatic" seatbelts... both front seat's shoulder belts were attached to the door and if the driver's side was not buckled the car would not start. The dashboard includes a large knee bar, like airbag equipped US spec Mercedes, so that you don't have to attach to the lap belt (yah right!).

IMHO the standard belts work better because the anchors are further back, bringing them closer to your body.

-Jason

__________________

Gone to the dark side

- Jeff
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page