Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 11-12-2009, 09:58 PM
compress ignite's Avatar
Drone aspiring to Serfdom
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 32(degrees) North by 81(degrees) West
Posts: 5,554
SS MESH Oil Filter Element

speedybenz got me started on this quest,by displaying K+P's product in another post.



http://www.kandpengineering.com/filters.shtml

I talked to them Today about a 601 180 01 09 version of the Filter that they've
made up for the AMG canister.
'Would fit Diesels from '82 to '95.
They're gonna obtain an O.E. filter from MB for comparison.

Advantages would be: An 8 Micron absolute filtration WASHABLE element.
I've my fingers crossed!

Below is the Absolute 8 Micronic Stain-Less Steel Mesh filter element they make for the AMGs.

Attached Thumbnails
Sub-par Quality Oil Filters-screenhunter_01-nov.-12-21.50.jpg  
__________________
'84 300SD sold
124.128
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 11-12-2009, 10:04 PM
pawoSD's Avatar
Dieselsüchtiger
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 15,438
Yikes on that FRAM filter. I just installed one of those in my car today! However, I've probably used 20 of them by now in all of our cars, and none have come out looking remotely like the picture....that thing must have been in there a LONG time.

I am probably going to be switching to the Baldwin filters soon anyways, and buying them 12 at a time. I'm going to be doing an oil change every 2ish months now with my new commute, so I'm going to need a lot of them!

__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life-
'15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800)
'17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k)
'09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k)
'13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k)
'01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km)
'16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k)
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 11-12-2009, 10:08 PM
Gurkha's Avatar
Satyameva Jayate Ad vitam
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Boondocks
Posts: 1,026
Dunno whats the hype on Fram filters, in motorcycle world they are considered crud anyways. One motorcycle magazine tested them against standard Japanese filters and found them to be quite lacking compared to the OEM.
__________________
99 Gurkha with OM616 IDI turbo

2015 Gurkha with OM616 DI turbo

2014 Rexton W with OM612 VGT
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 11-13-2009, 12:09 AM
Diesel911's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach,CA
Posts: 51,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by Billybob View Post
Where are all the millions of Mercedes diesel engines that have been killed by the many many millions of Mahle filters used over the last couple decades! It's a shame that after long debate and research here on the forum it wasn't found that packed cotton fiber filter used by the millions over many years caused any significant verifiable damage. How many forum members have actually had an engine damaged by filter material?

You'd think that, arguably some of the best engineering staff of again arguably, one of the oldest and most successful automotive manufactures the world has know, would be at least able to spec the single most commonly replaced maintenance part!
I am not seeing the argument here. Better filtration clearly gives better protection and helps things to last longer unless it becomes so restrictive as to mess with performance.

I want better Filtration and I have/am taking steps to that.

I also have also replaced my Secondary Fuel Filter with a 2 absolute Micron CAT Fuel Filter and plan to replace the Plastic Primary Filter with a VW Rabbit 10 Nominal Micron spin-on Filter that has a drain. I already have the parts I just have other issues to deal with.

If it seems like bragging so what. I read about peoples Intercoolers, Modified M Pumps and even replacing the Solid Brake Rotors with vented ones; or how about the folks that installed different Rims on their car.

At this time those thing do not interest me; there are things I would like to remain stock also.
If someone only wants to use Stock Oil Filters I am OK with that.

This forum itself is a little more extreme than the other forums I have visited.
__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11-13-2009, 12:12 AM
Registered Hack
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,642
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel911 View Post
I am not seeing the argument here. Better filtration clearly gives better protection and helps things to last longer unless it becomes so restrictive as to mess with performance.

I want better Filtration and I have/am taking steps to that.

I also have also replaced my Secondary Fuel Filter with a 2 absolute Micron CAT Fuel Filter and plan to replace the Plastic Primary Filter with a VW Rabbit 10 Nominal Micron spin-on Filter that has a drain. I already have the parts I just have other issues to deal with.

If it seems like bragging so what. I read about peoples Intercoolers, Modified M Pumps and even replacing the Solid Brake Rotors with vented ones; or how about the folks that installed different Rims on their car.

At this time those thing do not interest me; there are things I would like to remain stock also.
If someone only wants to use Stock Oil Filters I am OK with that.

This forum itself is a little more extreme than the other forums I have visited.

amen brother.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11-13-2009, 12:34 AM
Greg
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Carlos, California
Posts: 431
ive been using purolator in all my cars forever. they filter very very very well, and i change them with each oil change. theyve all been fine when i removed them.
__________________
Current
2006 E320 CDI, 57K bought at 67K "Liesl"
1986 190E 2.3-16, 198K bought at 56K "Brigitta"
1987 300TD (Chuggin Along), 292K "Friedrich"
1995 E320 Wagon, 200K "Louisa"

Past
1987 300SDL, (sold) 125K, bought for 1$ "Kurt"
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 11-13-2009, 12:36 AM
sasquatchgeoff's Avatar
Cascade Foothill Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 561
I think the concept "frequently change" is the whole thrust of this thread...
__________________
327K on 1986 W201, 602.911, 722.414 2.5 190D ("The Red Baron")
139K on 1993 W124, 104.942, 722.433 2.8 300E ("Queen")

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4081/...0bb92d3c_m.jpg http://i370.photobucket.com/albums/o...g?t=1325284354

Do not worry about your difficulties in Mathematics. I can assure you mine are still greater.
- Albert Einstein

take a walk down memory lane...
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 11-13-2009, 12:43 AM
Gurkha's Avatar
Satyameva Jayate Ad vitam
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Boondocks
Posts: 1,026
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregoryV022 View Post
ive been using purolator in all my cars forever. they filter very very very well, and i change them with each oil change. theyve all been fine when i removed them.
Those are the common one I can get, now Mahle group has bought out Purolator here and market their filters branded as Mahle, they are also supplied to BOSCH who market them under their name.
__________________
99 Gurkha with OM616 IDI turbo

2015 Gurkha with OM616 DI turbo

2014 Rexton W with OM612 VGT
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 11-13-2009, 02:30 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cape Cod Massachusetts
Posts: 1,427
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel911 View Post
I am not seeing the argument here.
Argument? You are free to do anything you'd like, if you feel good about it great.

The post I referenced was the suitability of oil filters meeting Mercedes OEM specifications. Specifically:

"Because they are filled with cotton gin waste, after long debate and research in another thread here on the forum, it was found that there are a select few filters that do not spill dirt and cotton waste into the engine."

I followed the thread referenced in this statement as well as similar threads and pose the question:

"Where are all the millions of Mercedes diesel engines that have been killed by the many many millions of Mahle filters used over the last couple decades!? It's a shame that after long debate and research here on the forum it wasn't found that packed cotton fiber filter used by the millions over many years caused any significant verifiable damage. How many forum members have actually had an engine damaged by filter material?

You'd think that, arguably some of the best engineering staff of again arguably, one of the oldest and most successful automotive manufactures the world has know, would be at least able to spec the single most commonly replaced maintenance part!"

I take it you don't have an answer to that question?

I'd suggest anybody with questions about suitability of OEM spec filters read the original thread is for no other reason than amusement. The "debate and research" in my opinion are illuminating, maybe more about the debaters and researchers than the actual factual suitability of one filter over another.

I'm of the opinion that if in fact "there are a select few filters that do not spill dirt and cotton waste into the engine" there would be considering the vast numbers of them dead MB diesel engine vehicles everywhere. There in fact is not. To the contrary in fact it is almost universally accepted the MB diesel lower ends are some of the longest lasting of all engine, and how that could be with dirt and cotton waste spilling into engines is improbable, no?

It makes you feel good to fool around with some different filters so be it but there is little evidence that in the real world you'll be driving much longer than the guy that buys a decent OEM brand that probably hundreds of millions of oil changes have used.

"If someone only wants to use Stock Oil Filters I am OK with that." I'm sure everyone will be relieved to hear that!
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 11-13-2009, 03:07 AM
Registered Hack
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,642
Quote:
Originally Posted by sasquatchgeoff View Post
I think the concept "frequently change" is the whole thrust of this thread...

absolute Ditto.

The filter that you posted was obviously neglected. No filter will ever disintegrate like that during the recommended service interval.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 11-13-2009, 03:13 AM
Registered Hack
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,642
Quote:
Originally Posted by Billybob View Post
"Because they are filled with cotton gin waste, after long debate and research in another thread here on the forum, it was found that there are a select few filters that do not spill dirt and cotton waste into the engine."

"Where are all the millions of Mercedes diesel engines that have been killed by the many many millions of Mahle filters used over the last couple decades!? It's a shame that after long debate and research here on the forum it wasn't found that packed cotton fiber filter used by the millions over many years caused any significant verifiable damage. How many forum members have actually had an engine damaged by filter material?

You'd think that, arguably some of the best engineering staff of again arguably, one of the oldest and most successful automotive manufactures the world has know, would be at least able to spec the single most commonly replaced maintenance part!"

I'd suggest anybody with questions about suitability of OEM spec filters read the original thread is for no other reason than amusement. The "debate and research" in my opinion are illuminating, maybe more about the debaters and researchers than the actual factual suitability of one filter over another.
agreed.

Personally, I think much of the fear surrounding the issue is a lack of understanding in the forces / flow rates involved with this particular filter design.

However, with modern oils and extended service intervals, there is plenty a good reason to elicit a greater filtration method.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 11-13-2009, 07:45 AM
compu_85's Avatar
Cruisin on Electric Ave.
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: La Conner, WA
Posts: 5,234
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel911 View Post
This is what I did

I took a 0.5 Nominal Micron Cotton String Wound Filter and inserted it in a Bosch Oil filter after Dumping out the waste Cotton Filling.

It is in my Car right now.
Tell me more about this. Unlike the 61x engines, nobody makes a good filter for the 60x engines anymore. I'd love to do this next oil change.

-Jason
__________________
1991 350SDL. 230,000 miles (new motor @ 150,000). Blown head gasket

Tesla Model 3. 205,000 miles. Been to 48 states!
Past: A fleet of VW TDIs.... including a V10,a Dieselgate Passat, and 2 ECOdiesels.
2014 Cadillac ELR
2013 Fiat 500E.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 11-13-2009, 08:12 AM
pawoSD's Avatar
Dieselsüchtiger
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 15,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by compu_85 View Post
Tell me more about this. Unlike the 61x engines, nobody makes a good filter for the 60x engines anymore. I'd love to do this next oil change.

-Jason
The filters from the dealer are decent, but quite expensive.

I had an experience with the cotton waste/husks falling out of a Hengst filter onto my work bench while prepping it. So I went anti-cotton waste. I only use the FRAM filters because they have clean string inside, that can't really fall out.

The bosch cotton waste filters work ok too....they have a high quality screen mesh inside to lock the cotton waste in securely.
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life-
'15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800)
'17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k)
'09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k)
'13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k)
'01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km)
'16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k)
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 11-13-2009, 09:47 AM
Graplr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 1,649
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel911 View Post
I am not seeing the argument here. Better filtration clearly gives better protection and helps things to last longer unless it becomes so restrictive as to mess with performance.
There is obviously truth to that. But what kind of degradation of the engine, how much better filtration and how much longer are we talking about by using OEM filters? As far as I know no one has ever done a scientific study to see if there is any difference in longevity. IMO, it would be an insignificant difference, if any.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel911 View Post
I want better Filtration and I have/am taking steps to that.

I also have also replaced my Secondary Fuel Filter with a 2 absolute Micron CAT Fuel Filter and plan to replace the Plastic Primary Filter with a VW Rabbit 10 Nominal Micron spin-on Filter that has a drain. I already have the parts I just have other issues to deal with.

If it seems like bragging so what. I read about peoples Intercoolers, Modified M Pumps and even replacing the Solid Brake Rotors with vented ones; or how about the folks that installed different Rims on their car.

At this time those thing do not interest me; there are things I would like to remain stock also.
If someone only wants to use Stock Oil Filters I am OK with that.

This forum itself is a little more extreme than the other forums I have visited.
I have no problem with people doing mods to their cars. I think what you're doing is cool...overkill...but cool. I love tinkering around and being a DIYer but to me creating my own oil filter that I change every ~4k that looks like I could leave it in for multiple times as long since it is showing no signs of degradation is not needed. I'll stick with OEM filters changed out at regular intervals along with putting fresh oil in. I did enjoy reading and looking at your pictures of you filter.
__________________
2009 ML320 Bluetec
1985 300CD
1981 300TD


Past Mercedes
1979 300TD
1982 300TD
2000 E320 4Matic Wagon
1998 E430
1984 300SD
1980 300SD
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 11-13-2009, 10:04 AM
Oldwolf's Avatar
124.128/602.962/722.418
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by compress ignite View Post
speedybenz got me started on this quest,by displaying K+P's product in another post.



http://www.kandpengineering.com/filters.shtml

I talked to them Today about a 601 180 01 09 version of the Filter that they've
made up for the AMG canister.
'Would fit Diesels from '82 to '95.
They're gonna obtain an O.E. filter from MB for comparison.

Advantages would be: An 8 Micron absolute filtration WASHABLE element.
I've my fingers crossed!

Below is the Absolute 8 Micronic Stain-Less Steel Mesh filter element they make for the AMGs.
If they have one to fit a 602.962 I'd get it. Payback would be less that 10 oil changes.

__________________
1993 W124 300D 2.5L Turbo, OM602.962
2000 Chevrolet Cavalier, 2.4L DOHC
2002 Ford Explorer, 4.0L SOHC
2005 Toyota Prius, 1.5L

http://www.fuelly.com/sig-us/40601.png
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page