Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #2  
Old 12-12-2009, 06:00 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: St. Thomas PA
Posts: 957
Maybe this country is slowly starting to learn what the Europeans have known for years.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-12-2009, 07:05 PM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,626
Sounds good. I saw one of the new insights the other day. I liked the looks of it.

Those mileage figures all looked low to me. Am I being unrealistic in my expectataions? I thought golf diesels routinely get over 50.
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-12-2009, 07:17 PM
awsrock's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tinley Park, IL
Posts: 642
Quote:
Originally Posted by t walgamuth View Post

Those mileage figures all looked low to me. Am I being unrealistic in my expectataions? I thought golf diesels routinely get over 50.
I think the figures are way off, to be honest. I call BS on any EPA diesel rating nowadays..mostly because the new ratings basically just chopped 3-4 mpg off any old car that you know they didn't even test..I mean, my 87 300D was rated 25/30 originally, and now it is just 23/27 or something like that...I can get 31-32 on full highway, and my all time average is 27.x. Go figure, huh. Gas cars are a different story though, since nobody really drives them like they do in the tests, and they don't have a constant efficiency % under part load like diesels do.

Ranting aside, my aunt has a new Jetta TDI wagon, and I think she said she gets upper 30s average, but with a lead foot. Her husband has an 06 Jetta and he gets near 50. I know the new engines have more power, but it shouldn't cost the car an 8-10 mpg drop!
__________________
Dan
2005 E320 CDI - 246k
1987 300SDL TD05-16g, Herlevi pump, Elbe manifold, 2.47 LSD - 213k
Past: 1987 300D - 264k
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-12-2009, 07:52 PM
rcounts's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kent, WA
Posts: 1,189
Yeah, the EPA says they "adjusted" (read LOWERED) the fuel econonmy estimates to reflect modern driving habits. Like the 65-70 mph speed limits we have now - compared to the 55 mph speed limit when most of our cars were new - and higher usage of things like AC, which reduce mpg.

I pretty consistently beat the current EPA estimate for my car too. I get 26-27 mpg in my 300CD commuting to work and back every day - 20 miles each way at an average of 30-35 mph (1/3 highway, 2/3 city streets).
__________________
1984 300 Coupe TurboDiesel
Silver blue paint over navy blue interior
2nd owner & 2nd engine in an otherwise
99% original unmolested car
~210k miles on the clock

1986 Ford F250 4x4 Supercab
Charcoal & blue two tone paint over burgundy interior
Banks turbo, DRW, ZF-5 & SMF conversion
152k on the clock - actual mileage unknown
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-12-2009, 08:58 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,381
Wow that A3 looks awesome! With a TDI I'm thinkin' hard about a new car for the wife now....
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-12-2009, 10:37 PM
rcounts's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kent, WA
Posts: 1,189
It's about time "the Big 3" pulled their heads out of their posteriors and started offering some clean diesels in cars...
__________________
1984 300 Coupe TurboDiesel
Silver blue paint over navy blue interior
2nd owner & 2nd engine in an otherwise
99% original unmolested car
~210k miles on the clock

1986 Ford F250 4x4 Supercab
Charcoal & blue two tone paint over burgundy interior
Banks turbo, DRW, ZF-5 & SMF conversion
152k on the clock - actual mileage unknown
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-12-2009, 10:54 PM
tbomachines's Avatar
ಠ_ಠ
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 7,370
EPA mileage is not very accurate...many of the mileage claims are a bit too low. My mother has a 00 TDI and we usually get over 50 mpg on the hhighway. I think the most embarassing test is in consumer reports...They only get like 12 mpg city somehow so the average fuel mileage goes down into the 30s...however all praise the ever-so-glorious hybrids for having decent city mileage and not ruining the tests.
__________________
TC
Current stable:
- 2004 Mazda RALLYWANKEL
- 2007 Saturn sky redline
- 2004 Explorer...under surgery.

Past: 135i, GTI, 300E, 300SD, 300SD, Stealth
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-12-2009, 11:20 PM
Brandon_SLC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: High on a mountainside, near Salt Lake City.
Posts: 557
Quote:
Originally Posted by tbomachines View Post
I think the most embarassing test is in consumer reports...They only get like 12 mpg city somehow so the average fuel mileage goes down into the 30s...however all praise the ever-so-glorious hybrids for having decent city mileage and not ruining the tests.
When CR says "City" they really mean it. Few people actually drive all city as CR defines it. But I like their tests, because they actually test in real world driving and give results for a wide variety of driving conditions. Their road trip results are a good guide for what to expect on long trips. IMHO they're a lot more useful than the new EPA estimates.

I've noticed the new, lower estimates seem to have ignited a mileage war in some segments. Like 33 for the Malibu, and 35 for the upcoming Hyundai Sonata.
__________________
1979 240D, 4spd manual, Power Sunroof, manual windows, 147k miles, Pastel gray/Black MB Tex.
1991 300D 2.5 - Smokes like it's on Crack!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-13-2009, 12:00 AM
sd300td's Avatar
huh?
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,116
I wonder how similar are the VW and Audi? Same platform with the Audi being stretched a little? Or different cars entirely?
__________________
1982 240 D, 308,000 - 321,127 miles (sold)
1982 300 TD,166,500 - 226,000 miles
1998 E 320, 120,000 - 144,000 miles
2005 C 230 K, 26,000 - 77,000 miles (sold)
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-13-2009, 01:48 AM
2.5Turbo's Avatar
602 648 113 A630
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 900
I saw one of those A3's with the TDI lettering on the door sitting on display outside of the Audi dealer in Ithaca. I knew Audi was going to start selling TDI cars here eventually, but it was the first time I'd seen one. Good for them for finally bringing it over here, even though I wouldn't ever own an Audi or VW...
__________________
Dale

http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g1...MG_2277sig.jpg

1990 300D 2.5 Turbo -155k
2000 E430 - 103k
2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee Ecodiesel 4x4 - 11k
2014 VW Passat TDI SE - 7k Bro's Diesel
2006 E320 CDI - 128k Pop's Benz


Pre-glow - A moment of silence in honor of Rudolph Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-13-2009, 09:35 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Blue Bell, PA
Posts: 12
I owned a 1983 Audi 5000 turbodiesel 5 cylinder..My very first diesel. 2 litre great car and approached the 40mpg figure. I lost the car after lending it to my brother long ugly story. Audi imported that model in 82 & 83 only.

The 96 Passat TDI approached 50mpg with the 1.9 litre engine. I sold this one to buy the 99 E300.

I am getting a consistent 32 to 33 MPG with the E300 and it has a 3.0 litre.

The prius is only effective in the city. Out in the country the Passat beats it hands down. These 2 cars I am comparing are 10 years apart in age. This tells me the German engineering is 10 years ahead. Oh, I forgot to mention that the VW has an enormous trunk

My MPG is of course on flat ground with no AC going 55mph.

My most recent expierence with our 2002 Audi A6 quattro will not permit me to buy another Audi. I am done with Audi's
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-13-2009, 09:44 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Blue Bell, PA
Posts: 12
I forgot to mention in my last post that the Audi A6 Quattro costs more to maintain each year than a 40 foot sailboat...
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-13-2009, 09:50 AM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandon_SLC View Post
When CR says "City" they really mean it. Few people actually drive all city as CR defines it. But I like their tests, because they actually test in real world driving and give results for a wide variety of driving conditions. Their road trip results are a good guide for what to expect on long trips. IMHO they're a lot more useful than the new EPA estimates.

I've noticed the new, lower estimates seem to have ignited a mileage war in some segments. Like 33 for the Malibu, and 35 for the upcoming Hyundai Sonata.
Yeah a lot of people who live in the country forget what city driving really means. I always get pretty much right at the EPA city rating with my vehicals. With winter gas in my truck I'm getting 14.5 now, while guys in more rural areas do 3-4 mpg better than that.

I'm very happy about this mileage war. Cars already have more than enough power, to much if you ask me for daily driving. Who needs a damn near 300hp V6 to go pick up a gallon of milk? I know I'm waiting for a manufacture to introduce a 1/2 diesel truck, I'll sell mine when I see that.
__________________
1999 SL500
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-13-2009, 11:04 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: St. Thomas PA
Posts: 957
Hatteras you make an excellent point. In the same venue, this is how we have ended up with a 3000# VW Golf, and a 5000# "mini" van. You are also correct that the average person does not need a 4 cam 4 valve engine that develops its rated power at 6-7000 rpm with the help of VVT just to go to the store or other local errands. Most people would be well served with a cast iron 2-valve pushrod engine, and even more wouldn't know the difference.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page