|
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
So the 190D also was available with a 2.5L turbo known as the OM 602? What is the difference between a 190D and a 300D w124 body?
__________________
Regards, Ian White 1995 E300 Diesel w124 OM606 2014 E550 w212 M278 biturbo 2001 BMW 740i E38 M62 (past) 1981 300SD w126 OM617 (past) |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
If you need a quick check as to what's what, hit buy parts and look at the years of interest (i.e. 87). The models will have the engine and chassis listed
__________________
1982 240D, sold 9/17/2008 1987 300D TurboW124.133 - 603.960, 722.317 - Smoke Silver Metallic / Medium Red (702/177), acquired 8/15/2009 262,715 and counting |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Oh, I didn't know some that the w201 and w124 shared motors. Were some 190 2.5s turbocharged? What are the differences between the w124 and w201? Which seems better/more desirable?
__________________
Regards, Ian White 1995 E300 Diesel w124 OM606 2014 E550 w212 M278 biturbo 2001 BMW 740i E38 M62 (past) 1981 300SD w126 OM617 (past) |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Oh dear, um. Yes, there were 2.5 Turbo 602's in the 190D's. I believe it was an '87 only thing.
The W124 is the more expensive, larger chassis. W201 is smaller, lighter weight. Not sure about the safety perspective (W124's are pretty good). The amount of desire is up to you... I've only had a W123 and W124, so I can't comment. I've driven a family friends 190E, but that really doesn't say a lot... Perhaps I might test the water and try a 190D in the future, but I do quite like my W124. I guess, it would be like comparing a current day C-class with an E-class. You might just have to go look at a local example and see for yourself
__________________
1982 240D, sold 9/17/2008 1987 300D TurboW124.133 - 603.960, 722.317 - Smoke Silver Metallic / Medium Red (702/177), acquired 8/15/2009 262,715 and counting |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
NATE,
Thank you, I apologize for my ignorance on all newer chassis. I guess I got to know w126's too much . I look forward to reading any more info other members post here. Thanks all!
__________________
Regards, Ian White 1995 E300 Diesel w124 OM606 2014 E550 w212 M278 biturbo 2001 BMW 740i E38 M62 (past) 1981 300SD w126 OM617 (past) |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
From what I've heard the 87 190D 2.5T's are little rockets because of the lighter chassis. Good luck finding one though...auto trader only has one in the whole country. 87 was a good vintage for MB diesels
If you could find one, the 602.96 powered 190 would be a fantastic commuter car. Better mileage than the 124 and decent power when you need it. However I'm partial to the 124; I like the extra space and the more modern chassis.
__________________
Dale http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g1...MG_2277sig.jpg 1990 300D 2.5 Turbo -155k 2000 E430 - 103k 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee Ecodiesel 4x4 - 11k 2014 VW Passat TDI SE - 7k Bro's Diesel 2006 E320 CDI - 128k Pop's Benz Pre-glow - A moment of silence in honor of Rudolph Diesel |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
So 1987 was the only year for 2.5 turbo w201's huh?
__________________
Regards, Ian White 1995 E300 Diesel w124 OM606 2014 E550 w212 M278 biturbo 2001 BMW 740i E38 M62 (past) 1981 300SD w126 OM617 (past) |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
There was a cherry 190 2.5T in Seattle a week or so ago, I just missed it!
__________________
Regards, Ian White 1995 E300 Diesel w124 OM606 2014 E550 w212 M278 biturbo 2001 BMW 740i E38 M62 (past) 1981 300SD w126 OM617 (past) |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Where are the numbers
Very interesting article. I have a 92 300SD W140 body. After reading the wiki article, I look on my engine for a 3.51 replacement head block, but the number that I have on the head block is 603.016. Is this means I have and engine that will soon will have a rod bost it and good by car? I like the car but I'm not expending $2k-$3k to replace and engine. What is your opinion
Quote:
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
1987 gave us the 190D 2.5 turbo, the 300D 3.0L turbo, and the 300SDL 3.0L turbo. A good year for all except cylinder heads, which are still better than most other cars on the road, ...
The 190D 2.5 turbo is quick, feels quicker than the '87 300D, but the '87 300D is actually 1second faster to 60mph and about 10mph faster on the top-end. Also heavier, larger, better ride, enough headroom and rear seat leg room for us 6' and taller folks.
__________________
Gone to the dark side - Jeff |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Those 87 300Ds really seem to be rare. Just did an Autotrader search...NOT ONE came up. How often does one see a good condition one for sale?
__________________
14 E250 Bluetec 4Matic "Sinclair", Palladium Silver on Black, 154k miles 06 E320 CDI "Rutherford", Black on Tan, 172k mi, Stage 1 tune, tuned TCU 91 300D "Otis", Smoke Silver on Tan, 142k mi, wastegate conversion, ALDA delete 19 Honda CR-V EX 61k mi Fourteen other MB's owned and sold 1961 Very Tolerant Wife |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Good condition are hard to find, the '87 wagon even harder. I've looked at two of them within an hour of me that weren't worth the $600 and $1200 that they were asking, I did buy one for parts for $450 that was in better condition than the first two (but crashed).
__________________
Gone to the dark side - Jeff Last edited by babymog; 02-03-2010 at 11:35 AM. |
Bookmarks |
|
|