Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-20-2010, 09:58 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: No. Cal
Posts: 22
Which model to buy?

I have been looking to buy an 86-87 300SDL and run it on WVO. But I recently considered the idea of going with a 98-99 E300TD. I don't know as much about them but it looks like it might be a lot easier to find one with low mileage in good condition. My reason for seeking an SDL was that I heard they can go 300k miles and even well beyond if maintained well. They also seem stylish and roomy.

Will a 98-99 E300TD also go 300k and well beyond if maintained well? Will it cost a lot more to maintain/service (I could change fluids and brake pads but much beyond that I will depend on a mechanic)? I had heard somewhere that the cars up to the 87 SDL were put together much better than all subsequent Mercedes. I want to keep a car for many years and want a car that will hold up. I was thinking of getting one with approx 100k on it. Any thoughts on whether I can accomplish my goals with the 98 or 99 E300TD (which are easier to find w/low mileage and in good condition) or whether I should be patient and keep looking for the older model?

  #2  
Old 08-20-2010, 11:55 PM
compress ignite's Avatar
Drone aspiring to Serfdom
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 32(degrees) North by 81(degrees) West
Posts: 5,554
Go Here:

http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&channel=s&hl=en&source=hp&q=Mercedes+WVO+forum&btnG=Google+Search

(Unsolicited Question: Why Youse Wanna go ruin a perfectly good MB Engine?)
__________________
'84 300SD sold
124.128
  #3  
Old 08-21-2010, 12:23 AM
layback40's Avatar
Not Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Victoria Australia - down under!!
Posts: 4,023
compress,
They just keep coming!!!! How to destroy a good Benz diesel without even trying !!
He wants to run on WVO & keep it for a very long time!! Maybe it will take a long time to fix the motor once the WVO has done its bit.
Best he have a read of

http://www.ncat.org/special/oilseeds_innovations4.php

Im taking bets on how long after he gets the car the threads on here will start about poor running & not starting etc. Then we will get the usual story about how no one told him about stuck rings etc.
The only things that WVO is good for are making Bio diesel & burning in your furnace/wood fire in the winter !!! Dont believe the hippies about how good it is in a car !!!!!
__________________
Grumpy Old Diesel Owners Club group

I no longer question authority, I annoy authority. More effect, less effort....

1967 230-6 auto parts car. rust bucket.
1980 300D now parts car 800k miles
1984 300D 500k miles
1987 250td 160k miles English import
2001 jeep turbo diesel 130k miles
1998 jeep tdi ~ followed me home. Needs a turbo.
1968 Ford F750 truck. 6-354 diesel conversion.
Other toys ~J.D.,Cat & GM ~ mainly earth moving

Last edited by layback40; 08-21-2010 at 01:04 AM.
  #4  
Old 08-21-2010, 12:54 AM
Jeremy5848's Avatar
Registered Biodiesel User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sonoma Wine Country
Posts: 8,402
The older engine will be easier to diagnose and repair after it has been screwed up with WVO. It will also likely be less money thrown away on the project.
__________________

"Buster" in the '95

Our all-Diesel family
1996 E300D (W210) . .338,000 miles Wife's car
2005 E320 CDI . . 113,000 miles My car
Santa Rosa population 176,762 (2022)
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . 627,762
"Oh lord won't you buy me a Mercedes Benz."
-- Janis Joplin, October 1, 1970
  #5  
Old 08-21-2010, 12:57 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: No. Cal
Posts: 22
Citing a study about the use of a single tank Elsbett for running a tractor, where the hypothesis of the author is that he used the wrong type of oil for his study is of limited value. For a useful and relevant article see auto.howstuffoworks.com/fuel-efficiency/fuel-consumption/vegetable-oil-fuel2.htm discussing, for example, the obvious difference between the use of the dual and single tank system which renders your article irrelevant. This balanced article lists all the pitfalls in using wvo but describes how the use of a proper system eliminates them. As to the earlier post, glaring mistakes in spelling and grammar give me pause about how much weight to give your opinion. I am not interested in a discussion of the merits of wvo but if you wish to keep beating that dead horse and have no life there are other forums and threads dedicated to that topic.

Last edited by cls67; 08-21-2010 at 01:59 AM.
  #6  
Old 08-21-2010, 01:52 AM
Biodiesel300TD's Avatar
|3iodiesel300T|)
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Albany, OR
Posts: 4,845
50k miles of WVO use in my 240 over the past 4 years. NEVER had a problem. Even in the dead of winter in sub-freezing temps. Car doesn't smoke, starts no problem, idles smoother than most 123's I've driven. What more do you want?
__________________
Andrew
'04 Jetta TDI Wagon
'82 300TD ~ Winnie ~ Sold
'77 300D ~ Sold
  #7  
Old 08-21-2010, 02:28 AM
layback40's Avatar
Not Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Victoria Australia - down under!!
Posts: 4,023
Best you do a search on here about motor failures related to WVO on here. Some motors are more susceptible than others.

I am not that arrogant to pass judgment on some one based on a typo or 2. Spelling and grammar were not subjects I had to take as part of my Engineering degree (a copy has been posted previously on here), though combustion theory was one of my majors. Maybe the OP has a masters in such?

Its interesting that there is no location or other details in the OP's signature. Not the first time that has occurred with these types of threads. Details on your location gives an indication of the climate that you wish to run the motor in. Your previous experience with diesel Benz's is also useful to know.

At least I was able to provide a link to a properly conducted trial, not just some opinion by a group with commercial interests in conversions. Interestingly enough the organization who produced the report is in the business of promoting alt fuel usage.

Given how little control one has on the composition of WVO, best not get too over the top about right and wrong types of oil. WVO is basically so variable in composition, how any one can comment on it is questionable other than it is a cause of premature motor failure.

With regard to which Benz is best suited to VO, I believe that about 110 years ago there was one. But it ran on peanut oil!! They were happy to get 300 miles (not k miles) between rebuilds. But then, if they suffered a stuck or broken ring, they would do a rebuild on the side of the road, Just get a bit of fence wire & wrap it around the piston in the ring land. It would get them home & the varnish from burning the oil would help to seal things up !!


Maybe you should consider the latest Blue-tech. Given that the motor can withstand urea in it, a little vegetable waste shouldnt hurt it !!!

Good Luck with what ever you do !!
__________________
Grumpy Old Diesel Owners Club group

I no longer question authority, I annoy authority. More effect, less effort....

1967 230-6 auto parts car. rust bucket.
1980 300D now parts car 800k miles
1984 300D 500k miles
1987 250td 160k miles English import
2001 jeep turbo diesel 130k miles
1998 jeep tdi ~ followed me home. Needs a turbo.
1968 Ford F750 truck. 6-354 diesel conversion.
Other toys ~J.D.,Cat & GM ~ mainly earth moving
  #8  
Old 08-21-2010, 02:51 AM
pawoSD's Avatar
Dieselsüchtiger
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 15,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biodiesel300TD View Post
50k miles of WVO use in my 240 over the past 4 years. NEVER had a problem. Even in the dead of winter in sub-freezing temps. Car doesn't smoke, starts no problem, idles smoother than most 123's I've driven. What more do you want?
50k proves nothing. Have you opened up the engine to check out the condition inside? If someone drives a good 250k on wvo with no issues, then I'll be a believer. Until then, I have seen too many engines ruined by people running it.

It is not even worth running WVO at the current fuel prices. Why bother? I drive 35k a year and it is still not *that* expensive. If you can't afford to put diesel in your car you need to be driving a 50Mpg Geo Metro, not a Mercedes.
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life-
'15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800)
'17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k)
'09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k)
'13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k)
'01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km)
'16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k)
  #9  
Old 08-21-2010, 03:48 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: No. Cal
Posts: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by layback40 View Post
I am not that arrogant to pass judgment on some one based on a typo or 2. Spelling and grammar were not subjects I had to take as part of my Engineering degree (a copy has been posted previously on here), though combustion theory was one of my majors. Maybe the OP has a masters in such? ...


At least I was able to provide a link to a properly conducted trial, not just some opinion by a group with commercial interests in conversions. Interestingly enough the organization who produced the report is in the business of promoting alt fuel usage....

!!
Your tone to start with was arrogant. You suggest that "they keep on coming" suggesting that "they" (those you refer to as hippies) are less informed than you. Those that wish to be contentious and arrogant should also check spelling and grammar. Those that are insecure and wish to stroke their own ego actually feel the need to post proof of their degree. You did not give a link to a properly conducted trial. You gave a link to an article about someone trying to run a tractor without preheating or purging. The author admits he should do his test with a different oil. The article I posted was written by someone who is opposed to WVO and warns against it. Had you read it you might have realized this. He does admit, however, that the pitfalls can be prevented with a proper system. If the author had a commercial interest in conversion systems he would not have opined that the cost savings will be eliminated when wvo suppliers start charging for their oil. Your bald assertion that the author is biased belies his opinions and shows that you either didn't read the article or didn't understand it. I asked for an opinion about a particular MB model. You have stated your opinion about WVO and made yourself clear. Since you are so concerned about it I suggest you take it to a forum or thread dedicated to the topic of wvo so that you can enlighten those that may value your opinion on this topic.


Last edited by cls67; 08-21-2010 at 04:27 AM.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page