Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 04-01-2011, 06:28 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NC/VA state line on the coast
Posts: 20
The link is the type of tester I used.
http://www.saferacer.com/longacre-leak-down-tester.html?productid=1958&gclid=CLeIv--T_KcCFQbe4AodiRHyqw

-I connected the tester to the injector holes for the first test (when rebuilt injectors). For other tests I used the glow plug holes.

-I installed the springs myself, not the machine shop. I didn't check them in a spring rater but they all were the same height and took a lot of pressure to get the nut started on the valve. I hope this is acceptable

-I need to rephrase build-up. I think the leakage problem is making the build-up happen. I hope that is clearer.

- Leak test was done at TDC of each cylinder and did not have to lock the crank. I made a homemade "timing tape" to determined TDC for each cylinder and marked the balancer. I can post the procedure I used to mark the balancer if needed.

Thanks again!

Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 04-01-2011, 11:06 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: central Texas
Posts: 17,281
Unless your problem is fixed... yes, you need to post a description of everything you did and how you did it...
This stumble... the same at all 'RPM's ?
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 04-02-2011, 08:57 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NC/VA state line on the coast
Posts: 20
Its throughout the entire RPM range. Its not a dead cylinder but a weak one. Its not as bad as cracking an injector line.

Here is the procedure I used to mark the balancer:
*A 4 stroke engine has 2 revolutions per cycle.
*I wrapped a piece of masking tape around the circumference of the balancer and cut the ends so they touched. Carefully removed the tape and stuck it to a table top. Doubled the measurement (represent two revolutions), then divided the total length by 5 (# of cylinders). I took that measurement and cut a new piece of tape that long. I stuck the tape back on the balancer starting at the factory TDC mark, and then marked the balancer at the other end of the tape. Repeated that step 4 more times and end up back at TDC.
Follow the firing order and every other mark will be TDC for that cylinder. You can verfiy by looking at cam lobes for each cylinder.

That was harder to write than do.


I am going to pull the manifolds this morning and test again. I will post later if I find anything.


Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 04-02-2011, 11:19 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: central Texas
Posts: 17,281
But how did you determine that the top of the piston was at ' TDC ' at the same time your crank pulley indicated that ?
You said you verified by the valves being closed.. but that is not particularly accurate...
Did you stick an extended dial indicator on the top of the ( or even A ) piston .. mark spots evenly on both coming up and going down.. then split that difference to determine Actual TDC ? In other words... you are assuming the pulley is not rotated on the crank ?
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 04-02-2011, 03:05 PM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
If I were you I'd take off the valve cover and check to make sure that the valves are closed when you perform your leak down tests.

I would also try doing a leak down test with a lower pressure as you may (just may) be turning the crank at 100PSI. But I have a sneaky feeling you are making a measurement when a valve is open.

EDIT:- Oh yes forgot to say. On the valve cover you've got the firing order nicely cast into the top. Follow this order - checking that the valves are closed for each cylinder.
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 04-02-2011, 03:13 PM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 26,843
Quote:
Originally Posted by leathermang View Post
But how did you determine that the top of the piston was at ' TDC ' at the same time your crank pulley indicated that ?
You said you verified by the valves being closed.. but that is not particularly accurate...
Did you stick an extended dial indicator on the top of the ( or even A ) piston .. mark spots evenly on both coming up and going down.. then split that difference to determine Actual TDC ? In other words... you are assuming the pulley is not rotated on the crank ?
this would be difficult to accomplish with a IDI diesel... you'd have to pull the prechambers.
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread
"as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do!

My drivers:
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!!

1987 300TD
1987 300TD
1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere!
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 04-02-2011, 03:48 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: beautiful Bucks Co, PA
Posts: 961
A valve can be used a TDC indictor. Let the piston push it up untill it goes no further.
But the TDC mark on the front pulley should be accurate.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 04-02-2011, 07:01 PM
babymog's Avatar
Loose Cannon - No Balls
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Northeast Indiana
Posts: 10,765
The timing indicator on the front cover is adjustable, needs to be set properly.

I did mine with the head off, with the head on you'll need to pull a prechamber as John mentioned. Be careful doing this though as the prechamber fits into a depression in the piston, need to be sure that your dial-indicator rod doesn't get hung up at an angle.
__________________

Gone to the dark side

- Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 04-02-2011, 07:45 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: central Texas
Posts: 17,281
WHEN PULLING THE PRECOMBUSTION CHAMBER.....

THE GLOW PLUGS MUST BE TAKEN OUT FIRST !!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 04-02-2011, 08:03 PM
layback40's Avatar
Not Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Victoria Australia - down under!!
Posts: 4,023
Leak down test should not be done at TDC. About 1/3 of the way down the stroke is ideal.
Has the OP tried doing a test after placing some oil in the cylinder to see if it seals it up?
__________________
Grumpy Old Diesel Owners Club group

I no longer question authority, I annoy authority. More effect, less effort....

1967 230-6 auto parts car. rust bucket.
1980 300D now parts car 800k miles
1984 300D 500k miles
1987 250td 160k miles English import
2001 jeep turbo diesel 130k miles
1998 jeep tdi ~ followed me home. Needs a turbo.
1968 Ford F750 truck. 6-354 diesel conversion.
Other toys ~J.D.,Cat & GM ~ mainly earth moving
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 04-02-2011, 08:06 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: central Texas
Posts: 17,281
Quote:
Originally Posted by layback40 View Post
Leak down test should not be done at TDC. About 1/3 of the way down the stroke is ideal.
Has the OP tried doing a test after placing some oil in the cylinder to see if it seals it up?
Agreed... AND it means some method of LOCKING the crank is needed for safety...and for it to stay there long enough to do readings... He did not mention adding oil that I saw... which should have been the part which showed how much of the leaking was being caused by the rings...
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 04-02-2011, 08:21 PM
layback40's Avatar
Not Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Victoria Australia - down under!!
Posts: 4,023
Another clue. After I removed the head, when removing the intake valve from the #4 cylinder I noticed there was a tremendous amount of carbon (or crusty oil) build up on the backside of the valve and intake port. It was so bad it was almost blocked! This was not normal and I was convinced the valve may not have been seating properly due to build up and leaking by. Maybe this is an indication of the problem.

I would have thought this was caused by a bad valve stem seal. It shouldnt cause the valve to leak though.

As a kid, (back when Noah was building the ark) we used to place the head of gassers on their side & fill the inlet/exhaust ports with petrol, if the valves needed doing you would see the petrol leaking into the combustion chamber around the valve seats. I think the same would work with a diesel.
The motor in question here sounds like it has a valve or 2 not seating properly. The head is going to have to come off again any way.
__________________
Grumpy Old Diesel Owners Club group

I no longer question authority, I annoy authority. More effect, less effort....

1967 230-6 auto parts car. rust bucket.
1980 300D now parts car 800k miles
1984 300D 500k miles
1987 250td 160k miles English import
2001 jeep turbo diesel 130k miles
1998 jeep tdi ~ followed me home. Needs a turbo.
1968 Ford F750 truck. 6-354 diesel conversion.
Other toys ~J.D.,Cat & GM ~ mainly earth moving
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 04-02-2011, 10:17 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NC/VA state line on the coast
Posts: 20
I think I found it. Looks like I got a bad valve job. Need to pull the head again and see whats wrong.

Check out the video. I did a leak down test again, sprayed some WD-40 in the port and this is only with 15 psi.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nx6-c6BTXzk

Thanks again for everyone's help! I will post an update after I pull it apart.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 04-03-2011, 11:45 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada.
Posts: 6,510
Well you learn or refine something everyday. I will put the heads on their sides and add thin fluid to the chambers on any head from now on as a pre head installation test. It just means you have to test twice.

Once for intake and once for exhaust valves before installation. Your issue might have been caused by really sloppy valve guides. This has the potential of causing your problem so check them.

When they are worn as you know the refference for getting the seats concentric is no longer there. My method I have always used of checking with the head on it's back does not sound as good. For another thing if there is a crack in the passage before the valve it might catch it.

I assume you put the intake valves in by a random choice method. Yet the problem remained on the same two cylinders. It is common practice to just change a few valve guides if the remainder are good.

Thanks to the member for the posting of an alternative head check method on this thread. I will always check the head unless I have complete faith the shop that ground the seats and valves checks their job well. Even then for the time taken it is easier than having to remove the head again.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page