|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What is the optimum level for water in battery cells?
I try to stay on top of the water level in my battery to prolong its life. However, I feel I may keep it too high. What I've been doing is keeping it at the level of the bottom of the caps....but I've had some acid spillover.
What's the correct level?
__________________
14 E250 Bluetec "Sinclair", Palladium Silver on Black, 153k miles 06 E320 CDI "Rutherford", Black on Tan, 171k mi, Stage 1 tune, tuned TCU 91 300D "Otis", Smoke Silver, 142k mi, wastegate conversion 19 Honda CR-V EX 61k mi Fourteen other MB's owned and sold 1961 Very Tolerant Wife |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Usually at the bottom of the caps is ok. Or about an inxh down on the average battery.Make sure the battery is pretty well charged up prior to adding distilled water. Also since you have had overfow issues check the voltage output of the alternator by reading the voltage across the battery at half revolutions.
It should go no higher than 14 volts in my opinion with a normal voltage regulator. Over fourteen and one half volts the regulator is probably defective. Keeping the car in regular use to me is the most effective way to get good maximum battery life. Thats just my opinion of course. If the car is stored all winter the only way in my opinion to keep the battery unharmed in any way is to drain the acid with the battery upside down. Put the acid in a glass bottle. In the spring add the acid again and the battery should be in the same exact condition as when you took it out of service. Wear appropiate clothing and a full face shield when doing this of course just in case. I have lost too many batteries one way or another in storage over the years to really trust any lesser method. Trickle charging, sitting off concrete in the basement for the winter etc have just not worked. Todays batteries seem to be somehow less durable when out of service than the car batteries of another era. Although the chemistry has not changed probably the actual plates design has, Last edited by barry123400; 10-07-2011 at 12:33 AM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I was always told to fill to pucker with distilled water.
__________________
Codifex 1981 240D ChinaBlue (Got her running with a donor engine.) 1983 300DTurbo w/sunroof. 1984 300TD manual sunroof. (Electrical Gremlins) |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The plates are porous & if you drain the acid they will be damaged. Also when you invert the battery the sludge in the bottom will end up contaminating the bottom of the plates. I believe the best way to store a battery is to keep it fully charged out of the car.
__________________
Grumpy Old Diesel Owners Club group I no longer question authority, I annoy authority. More effect, less effort.... 1967 230-6 auto parts car. rust bucket. 1980 300D now parts car 800k miles 1984 300D 500k miles 1987 250td 160k miles English import 2001 jeep turbo diesel 130k miles 1998 jeep tdi ~ followed me home. Needs a turbo. 1968 Ford F750 truck. 6-354 diesel conversion. Other toys ~J.D.,Cat & GM ~ mainly earth moving |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
You are absolutly right about some risks. Yet todays batteries seem to sulphate all too easily when sitting idle. I know something has changed with them. Of course any battery in your hemisphere is upside down to start with. From my perspective anyways. I also agree with the sludge risk. One defining charactaristic of a better battery is the amount of room below the plates to accomadate its buildup. A better battery has more room. Your thoughs indicate to me it may be better to pump out the electroylite if a small flexiable tube can be slipped by the plate assembly on some batteries. I have never tried this but will. It would tend to get some sludge or prevent it going upward. May not be possible to snake a tube by the plate assembly. When we used to buy a dry battery and the electrolite was added at the point of sale. The battery was instantly at about 90 percent charge and fit to go into service. You might have wanted to do a top up charge though first. Yet the battery as is would do the job of starting a car easily without a top up. I did also observe this practice was stopped locally. To me it also indicated the battery had been charged and the electrolite pulled as well at the factory. Now you have me thinking and That can be a dangerous thing. Certainly the manufacturers thought batteries with electroylite had a shelf life deterioration rate back then as well. It may have been ultimatly decided that the risk to employees at retail outlets handeling the electrolytic was too great a liability. Today when purchasing a battery I always try to fish out one at the back of the rack as it will have the most recent build date. Todays batteries have a build date sticker or notation on them usually so this is not difficult. The retailers are instructed to follow this policy of prior stock at the front of the line if they are a volume seller. Or stock in depth. I will go onto a lead acid battery forum if such exists or try to contact a lead acid battery expert somewhere and get back. I may have just been lucky so far. What I am thinking is maybe the sludge dries out and falls back down or is washed off when the acid is reintroduced. The sludge has to form a sustainable conductor between each plate to create a short. One other concern of mine initially was lead oxide forming in storage as well. Due to the lack of stimulation and leads reluctance to oxidize easily perhaps it is not much of a factor. We will see what the battery gurus have to say and I will force this thread back up with transcripts of their comments. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Hmmmm, juggle battery acid, OR invest fifty bucks in a battery minder with a desulfator...
__________________
'82 300SD - Somewhere over 220k - Becoming reliable... |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
methinks if I was planning to drain batteries, I'd invest in a topsider...
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread "as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do! My drivers: 1987 190D 2.5Turbo 1987 190D 2.5Turbo 1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!! 1987 300TD 1987 300TD 1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Strelnik Invest in America: Buy a Congressman! 1950 170SD 1951 Citroen 11BN 1953 Citroen 11BNF limo 1953 220a project 1959 180D 1960 190D 1960 Borgward Isabella TS 2dr 1983 240D daily driver 1983 380SL 1990 350SDL daily driver alt 3 x Citroen DS21M, down from 5 3 x Citroen 2CV, down from 6 |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
I would fill it to the full line. Such as the one on my battery now. Just a thought.
__________________
1991 560 SEL / 185k miles 1992 750il / 17k miles - project car |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Yeah, just noticed I had one. Kinda faint, but it's there.
__________________
14 E250 Bluetec "Sinclair", Palladium Silver on Black, 153k miles 06 E320 CDI "Rutherford", Black on Tan, 171k mi, Stage 1 tune, tuned TCU 91 300D "Otis", Smoke Silver, 142k mi, wastegate conversion 19 Honda CR-V EX 61k mi Fourteen other MB's owned and sold 1961 Very Tolerant Wife |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Well there ya go then! I had some battery issues. Ended up being the alt. Which then took out the battery. Ended up replacing both and now its been perfect.
__________________
1991 560 SEL / 185k miles 1992 750il / 17k miles - project car |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Here's an odd one I saw, once: Overflow issues can also indicate a shorted cell. The remaining cells end up overcharged and tend to vent acid.
__________________
1981 Mercedes 300TD, 1994 Honda Civic Del Sol http://mefi.us/images/fuelly/smallsig-us/67195.pnghttp://mefi.us/images/fuelly/smallsig-us/103885.png |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
That would be interesting, but there's a slight difference in scale and replacement cost for sub batteries compared to automotive starting batteries. That may affect the risk/benefit calculation just a tad.
__________________
1981 Mercedes 300TD, 1994 Honda Civic Del Sol http://mefi.us/images/fuelly/smallsig-us/67195.pnghttp://mefi.us/images/fuelly/smallsig-us/103885.png |
#14
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Quote:
Quote:
Fair to say that battery development has been to make them smaller & lighter. This results in less plate material. They have also minimized the amount of electrolyte. So level becomes more important. The OP has started a very good topic of discussion! Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The things that normally kill a battery are; 1/ acid eating its way into the support frame that the plate material is formed to. Can be caused by over discharge. 2/ Sludge build up shorting the plates. 3/ Mechanical damage to the plates from vibration. We always go for the heaviest battery with the same electrical spec. ~ thicker plates.
__________________
Grumpy Old Diesel Owners Club group I no longer question authority, I annoy authority. More effect, less effort.... 1967 230-6 auto parts car. rust bucket. 1980 300D now parts car 800k miles 1984 300D 500k miles 1987 250td 160k miles English import 2001 jeep turbo diesel 130k miles 1998 jeep tdi ~ followed me home. Needs a turbo. 1968 Ford F750 truck. 6-354 diesel conversion. Other toys ~J.D.,Cat & GM ~ mainly earth moving |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Disclaimer: I went through sub school and electrian mate "A" school during the Reagan era so thing might have changed!
__________________
86 300SDL. 250,xxx on #14 Head. One eye always on temp gauge.. Cruising towards 300K |
Bookmarks |
|
|