Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 07-19-2012, 09:59 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by t walgamuth View Post
Actually I have an excellent understanding of the two.
Of course you do. That's why you refer to torque as a parameter in top speed results.

Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 07-19-2012, 10:28 PM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 26,843
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
"Higher" could be "taller" or it could be "numerically higher". Both are opposite.

So, the correct terms are "taller" and "shorter". The 3.46 is "taller" than the 3.92.

Those that use "higher" and "lower" are guaranteed to cause confusion, as evidenced on here all the time.
the term "higher" is due to those used to dealing with transmission shifts...
4th gear is "higher" than 2nd gear...

the diff and or transmission gear RATIO's should use the term "taller" or "shorter"

the "higher" gear ratio is a "shorter" GEAR
the "taller" gear ratio is a "lower" GEAR numerically... this is why it's not good to discuss higher or lower when talking about gear ratio's... cause it's confusing...

so, in short...
higher and lower are terms you should only use when counting shifts in a transmission, and taller and shorter are terms you should use with gears...
and the word ratio should be left out of the conversation altogether...
whiew!


of course, you could use bigger and smaller... but that will bring up an totally different confusion and bragging and such...
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread
"as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do!

My drivers:
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!!

1987 300TD
1987 300TD
1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere!
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 07-19-2012, 11:51 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Out in the Boonies of Hot, Dry, Dusty, Windy Nevada
Posts: 9,673
Quote:
Originally Posted by vstech View Post
the term "higher" is due to those used to dealing with transmission shifts...
4th gear is "higher" than 2nd gear...

the diff and or transmission gear RATIO's should use the term "taller" or "shorter"

the "higher" gear ratio is a "shorter" GEAR
the "taller" gear ratio is a "lower" GEAR numerically... this is why it's not good to discuss higher or lower when talking about gear ratio's... cause it's confusing...

so, in short...
higher and lower are terms you should only use when counting shifts in a transmission, and taller and shorter are terms you should use with gears...
and the word ratio should be left out of the conversation altogether...
whiew!


of course, you could use bigger and smaller... but that will bring up an totally different confusion and bragging and such...
HMMM.................Ok.


Charlie
__________________
there were three HP ratings on the OM616...

1) Not much power
2) Even less power
3) Not nearly enough power!! 240D w/auto

Anyone that thinks a 240D is slow drives too fast.

80 240D Naturally Exasperated, 4-Spd 388k DD 150mph spedo 3:58 Diff

We are advised to NOT judge ALL Muslims by the actions of a few lunatics, but we are encouraged to judge ALL gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics. Funny how that works
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 07-20-2012, 12:12 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 1,623
Excel Program is available (but just not here)

Hi-
I really appreciate all your thoughts on my analysis. I was about to attach the excel file that I cleaned up a bit, but I just realized that I cannot attach a .xls file. Wish I had noticed that before I spent the last few hours tidying it up. Oh well. Anyway, I think Army was the only person who asked for it, so I will send it to him directly.

Andrew
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 07-20-2012, 12:34 AM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shortsguy1 View Post
Hi-
I really appreciate all your thoughts on my analysis. I was about to attach the excel file that I cleaned up a bit, but I just realized that I cannot attach a .xls file. Wish I had noticed that before I spent the last few hours tidying it up. Oh well. Anyway, I think Army was the only person who asked for it, so I will send it to him directly.

Andrew
And I'm looking forward to it. I reckon there's still some mileage in doing these types of calculations!
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 07-20-2012, 08:09 AM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,632
To the OP......I would not hesitate to change the diff but not to increase fuel economy. I would expect little gain there. It would make the motor quieter on the highway.
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 07-20-2012, 08:10 AM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,632
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
I already explained that I got about one-half of that amount, as predicted.
Yes, but you thought that 288 divided by 307 was a 9.6% od effect.
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 07-20-2012, 09:10 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by t walgamuth View Post
Yes, but you thought that 288 divided by 307 was a 9.6% od effect.
Calculation error...........since corrected.

The fuel benefit was 1 mpg.........about 1/2 of your predicted 1.7 mpg based upon the ratio.

This benefit holds true for most vehicles that undergo the diff change...........except yours. You manage to violate all laws of physics by getting the exact fuel economy percentage as the ratio change. Magically, the force required to dispel the air has also been reduced by the same differential percentage on your vehicles. Additionally, the work required to accelerate the vehicle around town is also reduced by the same differential percentage on your vehicles.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 07-20-2012, 09:13 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by t walgamuth View Post
To the OP......I would not hesitate to change the diff but not to increase fuel economy. I would expect little gain there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by t walgamuth View Post

In these MB diesels and in my suburban diesels if you drop the engine speed 20% you realize nearly an exactly corresponding increase in fuel economy.....20%.

Consistency in thought is a wonderful attribute.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 07-20-2012, 10:14 AM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,632
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
Consistency in thought is a wonderful attribute.
Unless I had a bad diff, I would never have changed from a 307 to 288. Not enough benefit there.

I'd be happy to share the log books from before and after diff swaps in my cars with you. And the before and after results from the five speed od swap into the 83 240/300D. I don't claim all the answers but I have documented results and over multiple vehicles.

The correlation is not exactly 20% but close enough for rules of thumb, in my experience.

It is not possible to control every variable so rules of thumb are close enough for me.
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 07-20-2012, 12:01 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 18,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
Those that use "higher" and "lower" are guaranteed to cause confusion, as evidenced on here all the time.
'Higher' and 'lower' are used all the time in regard to transmission gears so the meaning can easily be transferred to different differential ratios.
__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 07-20-2012, 01:18 PM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,632
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
Consistency in thought is a wonderful attribute.
In order to benefit from a taller gear ratio you have to have some available power to exploit. There is not much to work with with the 220D.
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 07-20-2012, 02:35 PM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 26,843
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerry View Post
'Higher' and 'lower' are used all the time in regard to transmission gears so the meaning can easily be transferred to different differential ratios.
with gear ratios in diffs, think of it like climbing stairs.

a 6' incline is harder to climb with 2 steps than with 4 steps... so a 2:1 ratio is TALLER than a 4:1 ratio...
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread
"as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do!

My drivers:
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!!

1987 300TD
1987 300TD
1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere!
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 07-20-2012, 02:50 PM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,632
Quote:
Originally Posted by vstech View Post
with gear ratios in diffs, think of it like climbing stairs.

a 6' incline is harder to climb with 2 steps than with 4 steps... so a 2:1 ratio is TALLER than a 4:1 ratio...
Good one!
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 07-20-2012, 03:00 PM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 26,843
thanks, it just came to me driving down the road thinking on this thread...
I'm sure it's been stated elsewhere before though...

__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread
"as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do!

My drivers:
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!!

1987 300TD
1987 300TD
1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page