![]() |
2 Attachment(s)
here are a couple of pics of the Niesel or frankentruck
|
Nice truck - but now we've got another dimension to your problem - it has to be cheap too...
As far as I know the top gear on the 4 speed transmissions (automatic or not) are all 1:1 I guess an overdrive is going to be your best option but I imagine the RPM range you want at 75 mph would only be good for a flat place (like where I live!) - a hilly place would probably cause the engine to bog down or an automatic transmission to change down. I don't know this for sure - you need to get in touch with people who have done this conversion before. I'd expect an OM617 in a truck to be revving closer to 4K at 75 mph... |
Check out some MB repowers on dieselbombers.com and I think you will find that your desire of 75 mph will require a higher rpm than 2800 out of a stock '83 Om617 with the size truck and tires your running. Most of the Jeep 617 repowers go for a differential gearing of around 4.10 with an overdrive tranny. Your vehicle requires more power to push it down the road at 75 than the 300D the OM617 was designed for.
I salute your resourcefulness! |
Thanks for all of the information, I think that adapting a toyota trans is becoming the most attractive option, if I can get one on there that has either a 4th (auto) or a fifth (manual) at or around .83 or taller, my math says I should be around 74.26 mph @ 2850rpm and that is doable. Yes one of the qualifications for any fix applied to this truck is that it has to be cheap, I dont mind spending money on it, but if you drop 300 here and 500 there before you know it you have 6 or 7k in building something that you could have bought (dodge cummins) for around 8 or 9k , it defeats the purpose.
Anyone have any experience making adaptor plates, I was thinking a 1/4 sheet of steel. I could cast an aluminum one, but I cant machine anything that large on my lathe. Im not sure I agree about the power, while the larger that a 300d tires will require more power to move, it is also geared lower which will have the opposite effect of the tires, also the relevant specs on the MB 300d are: 3582 lbs / 123hp / 181# torque and the niesel 3600 lbs / 103hp /134# torque so these vehicles are comparable, but you are right the larger tires will require a little more power, but the extra torque (35% more) should offset it a little, I know I wont be breaking any land speed records in it, but I think it will get up to speed |
I didn't realise the two vehicles were so closely matched in terms of weight and power - I think you're probably on to something there. Your prediction will probably be closer to yours than mine. Let us know how you get on won't you?
|
I've heard of a Volvo OD unit that can be adapted inline, I odn't know any more details than that...sorry..
|
If you concidering the Toyota Transmission, 4x4labs makes a nice adapter kit. Uses the toyota flywheel, meaning a clutch job would be at toyota prices aprox 100 for a clutch and pressure plate kit. much cheaper then a MB manual setup.
OM617 to Toyota W56 5 speed adapter kit | 4×4 Labs http://www.4x4labs.com/wp-content/up...3/DSC_0597.jpg I'm not offiliated with these guys, but I think they make a Nice product. Combine that kit with a dual transfer case from these guys and you have my dream power train for a small truck. Marlin Crawler, Inc. | Originator of Rock Crawling (since 1994) http://www.marlincrawler.com/sites/a...rofile_640.jpg My step sisters uncle is the owner of Marlin Crawler, they also make nice parts. |
Not to hijack this post, but if anyone can find an adapter for a '87 603 to a 4 spd auto locking torque converter, I'd be interested. I still have trouble understanding why MB did not include a locking torque converter in these earlier vehicles. GM & Ford did...
|
Ok I think I have decided on a 700r4 4spd auto with lock up torque convertor. Its a GM and they are in alot of 83 to 92 GM cars, they are a dime a dozen here. The gear ratios are 3.06/1.62/1/.7 and 2.29 dang near perfect. So at 2500rpm, I should be at 79.13 mph
(2500/.7/3.889 x 91 x 60/12/5280= 79.whatever) man that would be perfect. If you guys want, I will take pics and post them on this little endeavor. If anybody has any experience with this particular trans. please share it good or bad |
We always like pictures - so your effort will be appreciated.
|
2 Attachment(s)
observe the bizzare mating ritual of the mercedes and chevy. Got the new lock up tc installed, now just modify the adaptor plate
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yep, me too, but it will ease a little after the job is complete |
Well, I finally got the 700 r4 gm trans adapted to the rear of the 300d eng, and I like it . It took way too long, but it is a good match for the engine against the differentials in this truck. I had a few issues with the throttle cable, but I drilled a couple of holes in the throttle plate on top of the valve cover on the 300d so I could change the leverage / geometry and I think Ive got a pretty good set up. If anyone needs any information on this kind of swap, please dont hesitate to ask.
Thanks again for all of the suggestions. If I can offer something back to the forums, I have come up with a way to stop buying these waaaaaay overpriced underfiltering, restrictive secondary fuel filters if anyone is interested, but I think I should start a new thread so I will place a link to it later from here |
May not be anything you are interested in but GM made a 4 speed overdrive Manuel trans in 1981 and I'm sure some other years. I have one I put in a 1964 Chevelle SS with a 283 ci that makes a super road car. 1,2, and 3 are great for city driving and 4th is great for 70-75 (or more). The chevelle has a 3:08 and the truck the trans came out of had a 2:56. The truck was useless below 60 mph in 4th. Just a thought.
Paul |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:43 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website