Is my 602 vacuum pump likely of the newer design?
Much to my delight, I just discovered that the vacuum pump on my 92 300D was replaced under warranty in 1996 at 45,000 miles. And it does have the bolts visible on the face plate. I can't see well enough to make out the date stamp.
Does anyone know if a pump that MB replaced under warranty in 1996 is likely of the newer design that averts catastrophic failure? Please say yes. |
Most likely. Only way to know is to remove it
|
Quote:
You're as bad as I am, now you're fussing over stuff that isn't broken yet. :rolleyes: that's usually what I do until something really breaks then that keeps me busy for awhile. Hilarious. |
Quote:
But you must fess up: you've contributed to my vacuum pump paranoia! ;) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
ACD-ism over V.P. as an Avocation.
Shertex,
The True "Afflicted" will R+R AND RePlace the Vacuum Pump @ 100K Miles. (As a Prophylactic Enterprise.) Your '92's "RePLacement" V.P. has 193 K Miles on it !!!! The O.E. V.P.'s design and execution is an Invitation to FAILURE!!! 1.'Junk "Cast" Crap metal Housing and Fitments. 2.'Junk Semi-metallic "Ramps" device for powering the V.P. 3.'Even more "Junkiness" in the Sub-Standard Bushing holding the "Timer". 4.'Etc.,Etc.,Etc. At almost 200K miles on a V.P. You're not Obsessing to think about RePlacement !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
You're right! Now I'm really scared!! I think I'll replace the VP with every oil change....no, wait, that's overkill....with every ATF change. ;)
Quote:
|
Inspection
AND R+R, IF necessary, is NOT over-reaction.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website