Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-24-2013, 01:24 PM
Phil_F_NM's Avatar
Camera Hacker
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic region
Posts: 1,576
W115 and W123 rear suspension interchangeability

I'm a vintage diesel Mercedes addict, it's official.

Last night I just closed a deal and made an agreement to buy a 1972 220D that has been mostly garaged in a much drier climate than where my 1978 300D came from (some moist pine forest in North Carolina.) Now that I know what to look for and where to look, I feel like I got a gem in this 220D.

That said, last year I replaced all the bushings in the rear of my 1978 Benz and a lot in the front. My question is, will all the parts between the W123 fit into the W115? Yeah, you know what I'm thinking. It would be a lot easier to just move the whole rear end (without the differential) from the later chassis to the earlier one. I'm not looking forward to replacing those bushings but since this car has less rust (only 2 small spots) it might be easier anyway.

So, does anyone know the answer to this? The subframe and trailing arms look very similar but even a tiny bit of structural change would make them incompatible.

Thanks all!

Phil Forrest

__________________
1972 220D "Trudy," named by a friend.

"The 220D sounds good... I suspect it is the only car that you need a calendar for, rather than a stopwatch, when doing acceleration tests."
Tom Abrahamsson
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-26-2013, 12:35 AM
Phil_F_NM's Avatar
Camera Hacker
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic region
Posts: 1,576
No input on this?

Phil Forrest
__________________
1972 220D "Trudy," named by a friend.

"The 220D sounds good... I suspect it is the only car that you need a calendar for, rather than a stopwatch, when doing acceleration tests."
Tom Abrahamsson
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-26-2013, 12:44 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Phoenix Arizona. Ex Durban R.S.A.
Posts: 6,104
I could be wrong but I was under the impression that the 114/115 and 123 suspensions were completely different designs. Ie, nothing will interchange.

- Peter.
__________________
2021 Chevrolet Spark
Formerly...
2000 GMC Sonoma
1981 240D 4spd stick. 347000 miles. Deceased Feb 14 2021
2002 Kia Rio. Worst crap on four wheels
1981 240D 4spd stick. 389000 miles.
1984 123 200
1979 116 280S
1972 Cadillac Sedan DeVille
1971 108 280S
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-26-2013, 12:56 AM
Phil_F_NM's Avatar
Camera Hacker
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic region
Posts: 1,576
From underneath they look identical.

Phil Forrest
__________________
1972 220D "Trudy," named by a friend.

"The 220D sounds good... I suspect it is the only car that you need a calendar for, rather than a stopwatch, when doing acceleration tests."
Tom Abrahamsson
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-26-2013, 02:00 AM
sixto's Avatar
smoke gets in your eyes
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 20,841
You might have something. '76 115 and '77 123 use the same trailing arm and differential bushings but different rear subframe bushings. 123 trailing arms might have provisions for SLS even if SLS wasn't offered on US sedans and coupes so they will be different but maybe MB only added bosses and attachment points. You'll need to visit the EPC to be sure.

Sixto
87 300D
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-26-2013, 02:16 AM
Phil_F_NM's Avatar
Camera Hacker
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic region
Posts: 1,576
I ask for two reasons:
First is in my original post.
Second is because a friend and fellow forum member has a 220D with a very bad case of what is "negative camber" I guess. The wheels point inward at the ground side. Tires wear out quickly and handling could be better. I'm wondering what would also cause this.

Phil Forrest
__________________
1972 220D "Trudy," named by a friend.

"The 220D sounds good... I suspect it is the only car that you need a calendar for, rather than a stopwatch, when doing acceleration tests."
Tom Abrahamsson
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-26-2013, 06:09 AM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,613
I am under the impression the rear suspensions are very very similar if not identical. Are you planning to swap the diffs too? They are different in gearing.
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-26-2013, 06:57 AM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
My vote is that the trailing arm assemblies are the same - as far as I am aware there is only a difference in a part that is fitted to the W116 version (of the same arm) that allows (some of the) larger diameter homokinetic axles to be fitted. In short I'm (kinda like) 95% positive the W114 / 115 / 123 / 126 first generation all have the same trailing arm. W116 is in there too but some of the models have a larger diameter axle (source for that nugget => W123 FSM - chapter for rebuilding axles).

A quick check on EPC is confirm / deny this <= I still haven't bought it here so I can't check for you.

The sub frame, however, I am less certain about.

Positive camber => wheels further inboard at the bottom <= indicates too high a ride height. Check for the correct springs / shims. Sounds like it could have been modified (perhaps for towing?)
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-26-2013, 10:09 AM
JamesDean's Avatar
Electrical Engineer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 5,038
I'm pretty sure the arms are compatible. I generated this chart for a 126 and the 115 and 123s were both compatible with the 126..so I would assume they are also compatible with each other.

__________________
Cruise Control not working? Send me PM or email (jamesdean59@gmail.com). I might be able to help out.
Check here for compatibility, diagnostics, and availability!

(4/11/2020: Hi Everyone! I am still taking orders and replying to emails/PMs/etc, I appreciate your patience in these crazy times. Stay safe and healthy!)


82 300SD 145k
89 420SEL 210k
89 560SEL 118k
90 300SE 262k RIP 5/25/2010
90 560SEL 154k
91 300D 2.5 Turbo. 241k
93 190E 3.0 235k
93 300E 195k
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-26-2013, 10:17 AM
Phil_F_NM's Avatar
Camera Hacker
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic region
Posts: 1,576
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stretch View Post
Positive camber => wheels further inboard at the bottom <= indicates too high a ride height. Check for the correct springs / shims. Sounds like it could have been modified (perhaps for towing?)
Thanks for the correction.

The car with the camber problem is set up with a greasecar kit but the rear end is still low I think. Could just be a matter of changing those spring spacers then.

As for my 220D and 300D, I'm not sure. I'm going to have to get out the calipers and take some measurements as well as ensure angles are the same if I swap the rear suspension. It sure would be easier than redoing all those dang bushings. That was a chore. Now I know how to do it though so it wouldn't be as bad but still, it would be a pain since I don't have access to a lift.

To answer a previous question, each car would keep its respective differential, only the suspension would be changed.

I'm debating how much work to do anyway. The "new" 220D feels pretty tight on the road. My 300D was noticeably sloppy due to bad bushings but this one has supposedly been garaged for years in California. That's not to say bushings may not be rotten in the 220D but it hasn't been a daily driver around North Carolina which is where my 300D came from. It needs new shocks front and rear for sure. But I learned last time I did that to replace the bushings at the same time (if they need it) since the rear end suspension is going to be dropped anyway.

Phil Forrest
__________________
1972 220D "Trudy," named by a friend.

"The 220D sounds good... I suspect it is the only car that you need a calendar for, rather than a stopwatch, when doing acceleration tests."
Tom Abrahamsson
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-26-2013, 10:31 AM
JB3 JB3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 7,246
I am of the opinion as well that the rear suspensions are identical. I threw a differential from an 83 300D and axles from the same car into my 115 without incident. It was actually much easier to do because of the pop out plastic covers in the trunk on the 115, giving you above access to the diff nuts. What a great idea.

On the front, the suspension is completely different, BUT, I actually think it looks more modern personally.
__________________
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-26-2013, 12:23 PM
Mölyapina's Avatar
User title not in use
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Chelmsford, Massachusetts
Posts: 4,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by JB3 View Post
On the front, the suspension is completely different, BUT, I actually think it looks more modern personally.
Sorry... which is more modern? The W123 or the W115?
__________________
"Senior Luna, your sense of humor is still loco... but we love it, anyway." -rickymay ____ "Your sense of humor is still loco... " -MBeige ____ "Señor Luna, your sense of humor is quite järjetön" -Delibes

1982 300SD -- 211k, Texas car, tranny issues ____ 1979 240D 4-speed 234k -- turbo and tuned IP, third world taxi hot rod

2 Samuel 12:13: "David said to Nathan, “I have sinned against the Lord.” And Nathan said to David, “The Lord also has put away your sin; you shall not die."
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-26-2013, 12:45 PM
JB3 JB3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 7,246
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jooseppi Luna View Post
Sorry... which is more modern? The W123 or the W115?
the W115 is an older design for MB, but its a basic double wishbone suspension thats still in use on a lot of brand new cars. It just feels more modern to me driving my 74 240 (back in the distant past when it drove) vs driving my 83 240.

If you look under a 115 and look under a 2010 honda accord, you will see physically different, but principally the same concept double wishbone suspension designs.
__________________
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-26-2013, 02:49 PM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
Mercedes seems to have re-visited the idea of wish bone suspension since the W123 - W201 and onwards seem to be single wish bone designs. I guess double wish bone is just too expensive (even for MB - though apparently not for Honda!)
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-26-2013, 02:51 PM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil_F_NM View Post
Thanks for the correction.

The car with the camber problem is set up with a greasecar kit but the rear end is still low I think. Could just be a matter of changing those spring spacers then.

As for my 220D and 300D, I'm not sure. I'm going to have to get out the calipers and take some measurements as well as ensure angles are the same if I swap the rear suspension. It sure would be easier than redoing all those dang bushings. That was a chore. Now I know how to do it though so it wouldn't be as bad but still, it would be a pain since I don't have access to a lift.

To answer a previous question, each car would keep its respective differential, only the suspension would be changed.

I'm debating how much work to do anyway. The "new" 220D feels pretty tight on the road. My 300D was noticeably sloppy due to bad bushings but this one has supposedly been garaged for years in California. That's not to say bushings may not be rotten in the 220D but it hasn't been a daily driver around North Carolina which is where my 300D came from. It needs new shocks front and rear for sure. But I learned last time I did that to replace the bushings at the same time (if they need it) since the rear end suspension is going to be dropped anyway.

Phil Forrest
Oh sorry I misunderstood then. If the rear end is too low then that's usually due to dead rubber parts on the subframe and the differential mount.

__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page