Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-19-2013, 11:50 PM
CalicoJack's Avatar
Bearded Oddball
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Chickamauga, Georgia
Posts: 53
What's the most appropriate ATF?

I have a 1983 300D, and I'll be changing its transmission fluid pretty soon. What with Dexron II not being an option anymore, what specification would you guys recommend as having the best backwards compatibility and being most appropriate for a thirty-year-old transmission? I've been told Mobil 1, but other people said no, they changed their formula, you shouldn't use them now. The guy at Autozone said the new Dexron VI is completely compatible, so just use it, but it was my understanding it has different viscosity characteristics. Am I wrong?

I suspect asking about brands could start a war, so I'm not even gonna go there.

Thanks for any help you can give me!

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-20-2013, 12:04 AM
sixto's Avatar
smoke gets in your eyes
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 20,841
I heard Dex VI isn't good for these trannies but I had no problems over 20-30K miles. That was after Mobil 1 for 50-60K miles with no problems. Presently running B&M Trick Shift synthetic. Sticky stuff. I have to back off the modulator. Redline D4 is about the only ATF that still claims Dex II (IIE?) compatibility. Any basic ATF should be fine.

Sixto
87 300D
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-20-2013, 02:51 PM
NoSparkNeeded's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 509
DEX VI

I've been running Dex 6 for 3 years in my TD and wife's SD with no problems. Shifts are nice, maybe a little "crisper" than Dex 2 that was in it before, but the effect is subtle. I'm sticking with that for the time being, unless I read something really negative.
__________________
85 300TD FED-Daily
84 300SD-Wife's
86 XJS-Sunday
66 GMC-Work- Given to my stepson
83 BMW Airhead- Given to my stepson
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-20-2013, 04:59 PM
CalicoJack's Avatar
Bearded Oddball
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Chickamauga, Georgia
Posts: 53
My understanding of Dexron VI is that it starts off thinner but stays thicker over time than Dexron II or III--the specification allows for much less variance. That doesn't really bother me as much as whether or not the chemistry is compatible with seals or parts used in the Mercedes transmissions. But I would think that over three years or so, if it was going to degrade anything, it would have by now. So since everyone keeps saying that Dexron VI is, in and of itself, a much superior fluid to earlier Dexrons, I'll probably just use that unless someone tells me differently.

If you transmissions suddenly blow up, I'd be obliged if you came here and posted a warning so I know to get that junk out of there as soon as possible, though!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-20-2013, 05:06 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,740
My thought and what I have read, valvoline dex/merc is good.....running that now in mine....
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-20-2013, 09:30 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 3,851
When I had an autotragic in my 300, I used Dexron III. Aside from a rather bad front seal leak, it was still working perfectly when it came out for the manual conversion at 310,000 miles.
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar.

83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 400,xxx miles
08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 22,xxx miles
88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-21-2013, 07:42 PM
CalicoJack's Avatar
Bearded Oddball
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Chickamauga, Georgia
Posts: 53
Well, heck, there seems to be plenty of people running Dexron III and VI with no problems. I'm glad to hear all this, I'll give VI a try and let 'er rip. Thanks to everyone who put their two cents in!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-21-2013, 08:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: St. Thomas PA
Posts: 957
I use Amsoil Universal ATF in my signature car, it seems to work fine.
__________________
'83 300D, 126K miles.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-21-2013, 08:33 PM
pawoSD's Avatar
Dieselsüchtiger
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 15,438
Valvoline Dexron VI synthetic in two 300SD's, two 420SEL's, and a 190d (with 1993 190e trans) here, no issues in a combined mileage of probably over 175,000 on this trans fluid by now.

Also ran it for 40k in my bro's 300D, it died from rust, transmission still worked.
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life-
'15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800)
'17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k)
'09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k)
'13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k)
'01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km)
'16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-22-2013, 03:24 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,115
This gets asked a lot. I recall there is no firm factory-approved answer. I recall putting Dexron VI in one of my 300D's last time. I wouldn't be averse to using ATF+4 either, since I understand it is the best "standard" fluid (i.e. not after-market), plus I use it in all my Chryslers both new and old. Type F might also be good, since it had more friction (less slipping & wear of clutch plates). It was used in old Fords and I used to use it in my old Mopars. In general, you want fast, firm shifts to minimize wear. There might be an issue with some clutch plate linings failing in some fluids, so read up, but might be mostly hearsay.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-22-2013, 05:23 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 3,851
I might have tried Type F in mine if I was needing a shift quality improvement, but I already had it where it would sometimes chirp the tires on the 1-2 shift, so I didn't need to go there.

__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar.

83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 400,xxx miles
08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 22,xxx miles
88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page