Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-05-2013, 10:14 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: SF, CA, USA
Posts: 935
help please with PCV vapors

switching the PCV vapors from the giant black drum air cleaner to a catch can has not worked out yet. the stainless steel scouring pad baffling in the can seems sufficient to catch vaporized oil, or at least a good fraction of it, but the can still emits a steady stream of smoky gas, which previously was directed back to the intake.

when i'm at a stop this gas builds up under the hood, leaking out at the sides, which kind of looks like there's a fire burning under there. it also wafts into my open windows.

i suppose i can just reattach this gas to the intake , but i'm under the impression that this is not totally awesome for combustion. is there any alternative?

yes, my engine may have a lot of blowby; i haven't tested the compression. whether i switch or rebuild engines later on, i'd like to do something better about this now.

__________________
'77 240D, 504H, OM617.952, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-05-2013, 10:43 PM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 26,841
pictures would help, but are you saying, you directed the vent tube to a can, that does not have a hose going to the intake??? of course the can is not capable of holding combustion gasses... 22:1 compression, along with several thousand psi combustion will certainly escape past the rings... the gasses have to go somewhere. and redirecting them into the intake is wise. if you are adamant about not getting the gasses in the intake, you could create a siphon in the exhaust tubing... downstream of the turbo, and dump them into the exhaust, but that'd just push the cloud out the tailpipe...

where does the oil go, that the can collects? are you dumping it out?
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread
"as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do!

My drivers:
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!!

1987 300TD
1987 300TD
1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-05-2013, 11:50 PM
A work in process...
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 985
Quote:
Originally Posted by bricktron View Post
switching the PCV vapors from the giant black drum air cleaner to a catch can has not worked out yet. the stainless steel scouring pad baffling in the can seems sufficient to catch vaporized oil, or at least a good fraction of it, but the can still emits a steady stream of smoky gas, which previously was directed back to the intake.

when i'm at a stop this gas builds up under the hood, leaking out at the sides, which kind of looks like there's a fire burning under there. it also wafts into my open windows.

i suppose i can just reattach this gas to the intake , but i'm under the impression that this is not totally awesome for combustion. is there any alternative?

yes, my engine may have a lot of blowby; i haven't tested the compression. whether i switch or rebuild engines later on, i'd like to do something better about this now.
My opinion?

Burn those gasses. It's more economical, environmentally friendly and will keep condensates from building up under the hood and causing a grease film on everything.
__________________
Codifex
1981 240D ChinaBlue (Got her running with a donor engine.)
1983 300DTurbo w/sunroof.
1984 300TD manual sunroof. (Electrical Gremlins)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-06-2013, 12:02 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 3,851
Quote:
Originally Posted by Codifex Maximus View Post
My opinion?

Burn those gasses. It's more economical, environmentally friendly and will keep condensates from building up under the hood and causing a grease film on everything.
Either that or run a slobber tube somewhere. My* Paystar had one that vented over the left front leaf spring, as did the other trucks in the fleet. It wasn't uncommon for one of the less aware drivers to report an oil leak dripping on the left front leaf spring. Nope, just the slobber tube, and that was with trucks that only had about 40,000 miles on them.

*Ok, property of U.S. government, but I got to drive it.
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar.

83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 400,xxx miles
08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 22,xxx miles
88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-06-2013, 12:37 PM
Diesel911's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach,CA
Posts: 51,216
The below may or may not work. It depends on if the cause is sticking Piston Rings.

More Marvel Mystery Oil, said raised his compression
83 240d - no compression in #3 - Benzworld.org - Mercedes-Benz Discussion Forum

This is the begin of the above thread
Piston Rings Gummed Up? - Benzworld.org - Mercedes-Benz Discussion Forum

Marvel Mystery oil results sticky rings (not much info there)
Original thread also has + response
Compression Test...how low is low..... - PeachParts Mercedes ShopForum

Marvel Mystery Oil
http://www.benzworld.org/forums/w123-e-ce-d-cd-td/1619134-proof-results.html

Results of Marvel Mystery Oil soak by another member.
I didn't kill my motor after all. Maybe


Some of Our Members have said after driving 200-300 miles after switching to Synthetic Oil it freed up the Piston Rings.

Another Cause of Blow-by is worn Valve Stems/Guides/Seals on the Exhaust Valves. It allows Exhaust Gas to get into the crankcase.
Changing the Valve Stem Seals is a bit of work but the Parts are cheap. However, changing the Seals may on may not help of there is enough wear on the Valve Stems and Valve Guides.

My Father had a Gasser with that problem and if you left the Crankcase Breather Cap on the Crankcase Pressure built up to the extent that it pushed Oil between the Oil Pan Gasket.
__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-06-2013, 12:42 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Out in the Boonies of Hot, Dry, Dusty, Windy Nevada
Posts: 9,673
So what is wrong with the oil vapors going into the intake? The 78 and 79 W116 300SD had the oil vapors going straight into the U-Tube before the Turbo and burned them.
Then in 190 the invention of the EGR, and then the problems really started.

The inside of the Intake Manifold will just have a slight oil coating to it, and the burned vapors won`t cause any problems. after all look at all the crap people throw into the fuel tank, and it doesn`t seem to be a concern to a lot of people.

All older cars into the 60`s had a Draft tube hanging down from the side of the engine to let the Crank Case vapors out into the atmosphere, then the PCV valve appeared.

Interesting is my 82 Datsun 720 King Cab with the SD-22 Diesel engine has a Draft Tube.

Charlie
__________________
there were three HP ratings on the OM616...

1) Not much power
2) Even less power
3) Not nearly enough power!! 240D w/auto

Anyone that thinks a 240D is slow drives too fast.

80 240D Naturally Exasperated, 4-Spd 388k DD 150mph spedo 3:58 Diff

We are advised to NOT judge ALL Muslims by the actions of a few lunatics, but we are encouraged to judge ALL gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics. Funny how that works
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-06-2013, 01:51 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: St. Thomas PA
Posts: 957
My 2003 Dodge still uses a draft tube. PCV was installed on the 2007.5 model year trucks with the 6.7 Cummins engine.
__________________
'83 300D, 126K miles.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-06-2013, 02:55 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,740
People disagree with my idea on how to stop blow by but it worked on my euro.....do oil changes about every 1500 miles or sooner and do valve adjustments a lot till the valves stay with in spec.....my theory is, that more frequent oil changes help to remove all the gunk that has built up in the engine over the years....plus have the injectors rebuilt....
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-06-2013, 03:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: SF, CA, USA
Posts: 935
well, here are pix: 342790-my-catch-can-install.html (i am using a different breather than in the pictures now, but the principle is the same.)

maybe i have misunderstood something basic. why did the can come with a breather if a draft tube is the only convenient way to dispense with the gas? and if it's OK to burn the gas, why bother with the catch can at all?
__________________
'77 240D, 504H, OM617.952, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-08-2013, 03:28 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: SF, CA, USA
Posts: 935
so can i hook the PCV tube directly from the valve cover into a bung on the intake manifold?

or is the "caught" waste oil in the can better on balance not to burn?
__________________
'77 240D, 504H, OM617.952, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-08-2013, 09:34 AM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 26,841
connecting the tube directly to the intake manifold on a turbo motor will NOT work. it has to go prior to the turbo.
the EGR fumes are fine to burn! our cars are equipped with OM engines... Oil is the O in the name.
the problem comes in, when EXHAUST gets dumped into the intake... that soot turns the oil vapor into carbon sludge/crust inside the intake... a bad thing.
so, sealing and eliminating the EGR system is a common tuning method.
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread
"as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do!

My drivers:
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!!

1987 300TD
1987 300TD
1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-08-2013, 11:54 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Out in the Boonies of Hot, Dry, Dusty, Windy Nevada
Posts: 9,673
Yes, bad idea to plumb directly into the Intake manifold. Think Turbo = Pressure. so you will be putting pressure into the VC. You need a vacuum to draw the vapors out. So pre-turbo there is suction.

Charlie
__________________
there were three HP ratings on the OM616...

1) Not much power
2) Even less power
3) Not nearly enough power!! 240D w/auto

Anyone that thinks a 240D is slow drives too fast.

80 240D Naturally Exasperated, 4-Spd 388k DD 150mph spedo 3:58 Diff

We are advised to NOT judge ALL Muslims by the actions of a few lunatics, but we are encouraged to judge ALL gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics. Funny how that works
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-08-2013, 12:42 PM
DeliveryValve's Avatar
Chairman of my Benz
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Central California
Posts: 4,159
From the looks of your setup.



You have this.



I think what you need to have is an air/oil separator that separates the oil from the gas and then routes the gas back to the intake. There are no problems in performance in doing it this way if you are separating the oil properly.

Here is a diagram of how it should be routed. Except you'll need a catch can for the separated oil since you don't have a provision to drain back into the sump with your '85 Cali motor.

Attached Thumbnails
help please with PCV vapors-85467_part2.jpg   help please with PCV vapors-image.jpg  
__________________
1983 123.133 California
- GreaseCar Veg System


Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-08-2013, 06:36 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 3,851
Maybe I'm missing something here. Why didn't you just leave it stock?
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar.

83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 400,xxx miles
08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 22,xxx miles
88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-09-2013, 04:58 AM
oldsinner111's Avatar
lied to for years
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Elizabethton, TN
Posts: 6,249
I put a dribble tube on my sd,blow by gases,are like breathing in a paper bag.

__________________
1999 w140, quit voting to old, and to old to fight, a god damned veteran
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page