Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-08-2013, 08:19 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 52
Hydraulic Hard Line Replacement with Flexible Hose

The steel lines running to the rear of my wagon are shot so I'm faced with replacing them. Gut check: it seems easier to replace them with flexible hoses than deal with trying to ben steel lines under the car (and having them rust out again some day). I'm thinking something like these thermoplastic lines: http://www.swseal.com/pdf/Polyflex.pdf

Things to consider are:

(1) Pressure. Most of these hoses are designed for heavy industrial applications. I can't imagine the SLS system puts out near that much pressure. Does anyone know what the actual pressure is?

(2) Temperature. If anything I would be worried about low temps making the hose less flexible. High temp shouldn't be an issue except for under the hood, but I'll leave that section of hose alone for now.

(3) Chemical capatibility with the fluid. The fluid is mineral oil based, so according to the list on pg AB-16 here it should be fine with all their hoses. I can't find the specific fluid on their list.

(4) Fittings. I haven't pulled the lines yet so I'm not sure what they look like but I don't expect any issues here. Could be wrong...

I haven't done a cost analysis of the two options but would be happy to do so and share. If I go ahead with this I'll be sure to post plenty of photos and do a DIY walkthru. I've gotten lots of help on here reading through old threads so happy to contribute anything I can.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-08-2013, 08:29 AM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 26,843
I'd go with either steel line, or cunifer lines. the plastic, as you state, will be difficult in cold, fittings are likely to be an issue, and I DOUBT the price is comparable.
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread
"as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do!

My drivers:
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!!

1987 300TD
1987 300TD
1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-08-2013, 10:40 AM
winmutt's Avatar
85 300D 4spd+tow+h4
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Atl Gawga
Posts: 9,346
IIRC the pressure on those lines is pretty high. You should be able to make do with metal brake lines custom bent (yourself) and the appropriate fittings on the end. Try a decent hydraulic shop. Where are you located?
__________________
http://superturbodiesel.com/images/sig.04.10.jpg
1995 E420 Schwarz
1995 E300 Weiss
#1987 300D Sturmmachine
#1991 300D Nearly Perfect
#1994 E320 Cabriolet
#1995 E320 Touring
#1985 300D Sedan
OBK #42
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-08-2013, 11:10 AM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 26,843
I know the pressure is above 250psi, as I blew out brand new 250 psi hose on my first attempt to repair my SLS...

I think the original hose is rated around 1000psi. I replaced the blown hose with 4000psi steel reinforced Gates G6 hose, and never had another leak, so the pressure is under 4000psi.
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread
"as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do!

My drivers:
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!!

1987 300TD
1987 300TD
1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-08-2013, 01:46 PM
TnBob's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Shelbyville, Tn
Posts: 1,907
You could get lucky at a PNP and find some close to new ones for cheeep.
__________________
1985 300D 198K sold
1982 300D 202K
1989 300E 125K
1992 940T

"If you dont have time to do it safely, you dont have time to do it"

"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not."
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-08-2013, 03:01 PM
whunter's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 17,416
Answer

Quote:
Originally Posted by arzueck View Post
The steel lines running to the rear of my wagon are shot so I'm faced with replacing them. Gut check: it seems easier to replace them with flexible hoses than deal with trying to ben steel lines under the car (and having them rust out again some day). I'm thinking something like these thermoplastic lines: http://www.swseal.com/pdf/Polyflex.pdf

Things to consider are:

(1) Pressure. Most of these hoses are designed for heavy industrial applications. I can't imagine the SLS system puts out near that much pressure. Does anyone know what the actual pressure is?

(2) Temperature. If anything I would be worried about low temps making the hose less flexible. High temp shouldn't be an issue except for under the hood, but I'll leave that section of hose alone for now.

(3) Chemical capatibility with the fluid. The fluid is mineral oil based, so according to the list on pg AB-16 here it should be fine with all their hoses. I can't find the specific fluid on their list.

(4) Fittings. I haven't pulled the lines yet so I'm not sure what they look like but I don't expect any issues here. Could be wrong...

I haven't done a cost analysis of the two options but would be happy to do so and share. If I go ahead with this I'll be sure to post plenty of photos and do a DIY walkthru. I've gotten lots of help on here reading through old threads so happy to contribute anything I can.
The reason they are STEEL is road debris = sharp and/or abrasive trash..

This is a common issue I see on vegetable oil conversion cars, road debris = shredded plastic or rubber hoses..

FYI the SLS system can see pressure in the range of 650 PSI.

.
__________________
ASE Master Mechanic
asemastermechanic@juno.com

Prototype R&D/testing:
Thermal & Aerodynamic System Engineering (TASE) Senior vehicle instrumentation technician.
Noise Vibration and Harshness (NVH).
Dynamometer.
Heat exchanger durability.
HV-A/C Climate Control.
Vehicle build.
Fleet Durability
Technical Quality Auditor.
Automotive Technical Writer

1985 300SD
1983 300D
1984 190D
2003 Volvo V70
2002 Honda Civic

https://www.boldegoist.com/
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-08-2013, 06:18 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 52
I'm located on Long Island and luckily have a good hydraulic shop right down the road (Long Island Truck Parts). I'll take the old stuff out this weekend and head down there. I guess I'll probably end up going with some kind of metal line that they have, unless they recommend otherwise.

Thanks Whunter for the pressure rating. That's well under most of the high pressure hoses, as I suspected. And yeah, I can see road debris being a potential issue.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-08-2013, 06:31 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,534
What is the OD of the steel lines?

The greatest concern is gathering fittings that will work with your car.

-4 ( 1/4" ID ) single wire 100R1AT hydraulic hose is good for about 3.200 PSI and is more flexible / smaller OD that 2 wire 100R2AT 5,800 PSI . ( This is the number of steel braid layers under the outer jacket.)

-6 ( 3/8 ) is 2,600 and 4,800.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-18-2013, 01:26 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 52
Update: I replaced the steel lines and the system is holding and pumping fluid normally, so all good there. I used 1/4 inch line and had to bore out the fittings a bit to make them fit over it.

Ride height has not increased, so on to the next troubleshooting item...

Also, when driving yesterday I had about 250 extra lbs in the car and when I first added it the ride all of the sudden got VERY rough. Lasted for about 5 mins then back to normal.

I'll look on other SLS threads for advice but f anyone has thoughts feel free to share here.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-18-2013, 02:07 PM
Diesel911's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach,CA
Posts: 51,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by arzueck View Post
Update: I replaced the steel lines and the system is holding and pumping fluid normally, so all good there. I used 1/4 inch line and had to bore out the fittings a bit to make them fit over it.

Ride height has not increased, so on to the next troubleshooting item...

Also, when driving yesterday I had about 250 extra lbs in the car and when I first added it the ride all of the sudden got VERY rough. Lasted for about 5 mins then back to normal.

I'll look on other SLS threads for advice but f anyone has thoughts feel free to share here.
Did you DIY it and did you use the Original Fittings?
__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-18-2013, 04:34 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 52
Yes I used the original fittings. They just didn't fit the US line.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-18-2013, 05:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 18,350
More details on how you got the fittings to work would be helpful for other members facing the same issue.
__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-19-2013, 01:34 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 52
Of course!

So the OD of the line I got from the auto parts store is 1/4", but the ID of the fitting is a metric size slightly smaller than that (about 10 microns I think). So what you have to do to get the fitting to fit over the line is to just bore out the inside a little bit.

You could drill it - starting with a 1/4" and then going to a 9/32" and trying it until you get it to fit. But I happened to have access to a pneumatic boring tool so used that.

After that, fitting slid right on and I was able to flare the end and connect to the valve.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-19-2013, 06:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,534
The size would have been 6 mm
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-25-2014, 01:08 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Central PA
Posts: 128
I know this is an old thread, but..

What type of flare did you use?
I believe the stock flares are "bubble" flares, or reverse flares.

If that's what you did, how did you make them?

I'm facing the same issue.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page