|
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Yes, rear mounted bike racks can create huge aerodynamic drag. I keep a pair of folding bikes in the trunk of the 124 with room to spare with no fuel consumption penalty. One time I managed to fit 4 in there.
__________________
CENSORED due to not family friendly words Last edited by tjts1; 08-03-2014 at 06:03 PM. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Is your injection pump turned up?
A turned up pump might not affect mileage too much around town as excess fueling would mostly occur starting from a stop. But, when on the road you might be into the throttle pretty deep and into excess fueling constantly. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
I'm thinking it was a combination of the bike rack and the extra weight. How big were the passengers, and how heavy do they pack?
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar. 83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 400,xxx miles 08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 22,xxx miles 88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Passengers were all under 155# and really for two women they kept it down. I kept them on their toes by saying there wouldnt be any room for anything. Actually the w201 was probably designed to get two golf bags into the trunk-- there is a lot of room back there.
I like the bike rack theory. BUT-- I was burning black smoke on hard takeoffs like when I had to get across an intersection. Is that a IP symptom? I really wonder if my VCV on the back of the IP is doing what it ought. It is extremely hard to service and so get very little attention. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
I'm wondering what vehicle we're talking about. My 84SD with a turning odometer doesn't get 30 mpg. It is more like 22. I don't know that the odometer is accurate. The valves are adjusted. I "suspect" injectors could use attention since idle is a little rough on start up.
A bike rack would have a large effect. Weight some effect but not as much as rotating mass.
__________________
85SD 240K & stopped counting painted, putting bac together. 84SD 180,000. sold to a neighbor and member here but I forget his handle. The 84 is much improved from when I had it. 85TD beginning to repair to DD status. Lots of stuff to do. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
See my post # 18. Black smoke / = power , black smoke = wasted fuel.
You were probably overfueling going down the road too. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
I've used a Yakima roof rack on my 123 sedan, 124 sedan and wagon, 210 wagon, 203 wagon, and 211 wagon. A 4MPG decrease is typical with the rack in place and 2 or 3 bicycles mounted up top. I sure can't see a trunk mounted rack having as big an impact, let along 8MPG. Maybe the rack cost a bit of efficiency, but I think most of it had to be from other causes.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
CENSORED due to not family friendly words |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
My usual around home mileage without a bike rack is consistently 34mpg during the summer,tankful after tankful. So you can see that when I saw 27mpg I was pretty surprised. I had someone following me all day who said they saw black smoke from time to time, probably when I downshifted. This current 190d has 84,000 miles and a new head gasket. It purrs really. No oil consumption this year to date. No noticeable smoking or smells when starting. Timing chain showed zero stretch when I had the head off. But there is something amiss in the EGR electricals, and kickdown switch isnt getting any power, so I know its not 100% happy. Hopefully this winter I can dig into it. Meanwhile, no bikes without a fuel surcharge... |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Except that bicycles on the roof are being dragged through clear air creating maximum drag. A bicycle sitting 12 inches off the back of the trunk is in the low pressure area directly behind the car. Just doesn't feel right. Some quick googling shows typical claims of 2-3MPG impact for trunk mount racks and 5MPG for roof racks. As always, YMMV.
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Yes, there are many things that were dragging MPG down. It is somewhat difficult to see light smoke when following in daylight hours. Some years ago I used a friends gen 1 Dodge diesel to pull a 22 ft box trailer. In daylight hours I could not see any smoke from the side exit exhaust pipe. At night when a following car's headlights provided back illumination, light smoke was visible. Yes, the pump was turned up and the owner went to great pains to minimize daylight visible smoke as he subscribes to black smoke = wasted fuel. (A slight puff and cracking the throttle is acceptable ) |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
LOL 27mpg and we are complaining....the worse I got on my trip, loaded roof rack and truck was 16mpg.....I wouldn't be complaining on that figure...
__________________
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|