Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-15-2014, 06:39 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Barrington, RI
Posts: 5,875
Elimination of Vacuum Reservoir W124

On my 91 300D, I concluded that my vacuum problem was a bad VCV....so I replaced it. Things were noticeably improved, but I still had the occasional bumpy downshift. So, just for grins, I took the vacuum reservoir offline. And, wadda you know, shifting is perfect.

Especially on a 23 year old car, I'm all for simplifying the vacuum system to the extent possible to eliminate variables. AFAIK W124 vacuum reservoir - purpose?, the only purpose of the reservoir is to create a buffer of vacuum for faster flap openings and closings in the climate control....which I can certainly live without.

Anyone else take their reservoir offline? Any noticeable effects?

I know eventually I can eliminate the BFS....but I think I'll leave well enough alone for now.

__________________
14 E250 Bluetec "Sinclair", Palladium Silver on Black, 153k miles
06 E320 CDI "Rutherford", Black on Tan, 171k mi, Stage 1 tune, tuned TCU
91 300D "Otis", Smoke Silver, 142k mi, wastegate conversion

19 Honda CR-V EX 61k mi
Fourteen other MB's owned and sold
1961 Very Tolerant Wife
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-15-2014, 09:35 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Barrington, RI
Posts: 5,875
Drove around a bunch this morning....vacuum functionality is perfect in all respects....flaps open and close immediately and, for the first time ever, headrests retract immediately.

I wonder if one of the reasons for the reservoir in the original design is the extent of the vacuum network....perhaps not nearly as necessary once the stuff on the passenger side of the engine is eliminated.
__________________
14 E250 Bluetec "Sinclair", Palladium Silver on Black, 153k miles
06 E320 CDI "Rutherford", Black on Tan, 171k mi, Stage 1 tune, tuned TCU
91 300D "Otis", Smoke Silver, 142k mi, wastegate conversion

19 Honda CR-V EX 61k mi
Fourteen other MB's owned and sold
1961 Very Tolerant Wife
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-15-2014, 10:09 AM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,626
Do your door locks work?
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-15-2014, 10:14 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Barrington, RI
Posts: 5,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by t walgamuth View Post
Do your door locks work?
Yes....but that's a different system, operated by an electric pump.
__________________
14 E250 Bluetec "Sinclair", Palladium Silver on Black, 153k miles
06 E320 CDI "Rutherford", Black on Tan, 171k mi, Stage 1 tune, tuned TCU
91 300D "Otis", Smoke Silver, 142k mi, wastegate conversion

19 Honda CR-V EX 61k mi
Fourteen other MB's owned and sold
1961 Very Tolerant Wife
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-15-2014, 10:40 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 282
I wondered if eliminating the reservoir would slow the "response time" of vacuum to the transmission. But when I checked vacuum to the tranny while cruising around I found the supply to be very responsive to pedal travel without the reservoir. Vacuum climbed and dropped almost instantly, as I assume it should.

Still can't seem to smooth very light "throttle" shifts though...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-15-2014, 10:42 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The slums of Beverly Hills
Posts: 8,065
The vacuum reservoir is a completely passive system. Theres not much that can go wrong other than the rubber hose connectors. I would check those, replace whats worn out and move on. I've eliminated a lot of vacuum hoses and devices in my engine bay but the reservoir in the driver's side fender is still there.
__________________
CENSORED due to not family friendly words
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-15-2014, 11:16 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Barrington, RI
Posts: 5,875
I noticed that MB themselves eliminated the vacuum reservoir effective 06/91 with MY92.....looks like they themselves regarded it as unnecessary when they revamped the vacuum system for 1992.
__________________
14 E250 Bluetec "Sinclair", Palladium Silver on Black, 153k miles
06 E320 CDI "Rutherford", Black on Tan, 171k mi, Stage 1 tune, tuned TCU
91 300D "Otis", Smoke Silver, 142k mi, wastegate conversion

19 Honda CR-V EX 61k mi
Fourteen other MB's owned and sold
1961 Very Tolerant Wife
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-15-2014, 11:53 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 282
Driver side?

Don't forget about the coolant overflow tank. The hose to mine was corroded in half... glad I found that one

I wonder if I could fill the reservoir as a little back up supply...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-15-2014, 12:45 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,944
The reservoir acts as a buffer when there's a big demand on vacuum, such as when you pump the brakes. I don't see any reason why it would ever be a problem, but people seem to like removing things.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-15-2014, 12:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Barrington, RI
Posts: 5,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mxfrank View Post
The reservoir acts as a buffer when there's a big demand on vacuum, such as when you pump the brakes. I don't see any reason why it would ever be a problem, but people seem to like removing things.
If it's involved in something as critical as braking (which I'm not sure is the case...isn't that what the brake booster is for?), why did MB eliminate it in 92?
__________________
14 E250 Bluetec "Sinclair", Palladium Silver on Black, 153k miles
06 E320 CDI "Rutherford", Black on Tan, 171k mi, Stage 1 tune, tuned TCU
91 300D "Otis", Smoke Silver, 142k mi, wastegate conversion

19 Honda CR-V EX 61k mi
Fourteen other MB's owned and sold
1961 Very Tolerant Wife
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-15-2014, 03:04 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: TX
Posts: 3,978
MB did not rid of the vacuum reservoir - its installed on my 1995 E300D behind the passenger fender liner and is linked via a brick red vacuum tube that tees off from the Y junction behind the brake booster.

Mine was disconnected because the line was cut, I repaired it with some rubber tubing while I was doing blower motor R&R. It smoothed out the yank of transmission shifting to a firm surge of power and also helped the dashboard flaps to work quicker (I think)
__________________
2012 BMW X5 (Beef + Granite suspension model)

1995 E300D - The original humming machine (consumed by Flood 2017)
2000 E320 - The evolution (consumed by flood 2017)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-15-2014, 03:33 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Barrington, RI
Posts: 5,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zulfiqar View Post
MB did not rid of the vacuum reservoir - its installed on my 1995 E300D behind the passenger fender liner and is linked via a brick red vacuum tube that tees off from the Y junction behind the brake booster.

Mine was disconnected because the line was cut, I repaired it with some rubber tubing while I was doing blower motor R&R. It smoothed out the yank of transmission shifting to a firm surge of power and also helped the dashboard flaps to work quicker (I think)
Well, perhaps they added it back in 95. But if you look at a vacuum diagram for the 92, it's not there.

All I can say that is, with mine offline, I have perfect vacuum functionality of everything....except for the passenger side stuff which was intentionally removed.
__________________
14 E250 Bluetec "Sinclair", Palladium Silver on Black, 153k miles
06 E320 CDI "Rutherford", Black on Tan, 171k mi, Stage 1 tune, tuned TCU
91 300D "Otis", Smoke Silver, 142k mi, wastegate conversion

19 Honda CR-V EX 61k mi
Fourteen other MB's owned and sold
1961 Very Tolerant Wife
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-15-2014, 03:46 PM
scottmcphee's Avatar
1987 w124 300D
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 1,539
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarpeDiem51392 View Post

Still can't seem to smooth very light "throttle" shifts though...
Adjust your bowden cable.
__________________
Cheers!
Scott McPhee

1987 300D
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-15-2014, 05:01 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: TX
Posts: 3,978
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottmcphee View Post
Adjust your bowden cable.
that problem more sounds like old ATF or bad modulator adjustment.
__________________
2012 BMW X5 (Beef + Granite suspension model)

1995 E300D - The original humming machine (consumed by Flood 2017)
2000 E320 - The evolution (consumed by flood 2017)
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-16-2014, 02:05 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 282
Fluids good, I've made adjustments with various results.

Something's not right with the rear end that may be the cause. Maybe the axle half shafts.. not sure

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page