|
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Calling Jeremy Clarkson, calling Jeremy Clarkson, ...
Reminds me of when we were working on the new W124 and I had some Engineers from Mercedes visiting. This was in the fantastic NMSL days of 55mph. I asked the Engineers (with a smile) how they liked our 55mph freeways. One responded "how do you stay awake?".
__________________
Gone to the dark side - Jeff |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
I'm just not seeing this take-a-taxi-everywhere world. It already exists, and isn't cost effective in most parts of the country. In order to make it work, you'd have to reduce the trip cost and the wait times that exist in the current system. Those two are mutually exclusive -- there's no way to reduce one without increasing the other.
Self-driving cars are not going to be a panacea here -- yes, there will be a savings on driver labor, but there will also be an increase in maintenance costs over the long term due to the increased complexity of the system -- it will take more labor, from techs that require a greater amount of training and therefore charge more, to diagnose the odd behaviors that the cars will evolve. And on top of all that, you're paying someone's profit margin on providing the taxi service. So no, I'm not seeing this take-a-taxi-everywhere world as being a cheaper way of life, and most people opt for the cheaper way of life. The amusing thing is, I actually want this world to happen though. I used to be able to take public transit, and I really liked being able to use that time instead of having to constantly pay attention to the butt of the car in front of me. The day the Johnny Cab can take me to work for $3*, is the day I stop driving to/from work. Ain't gonna ever happen. * I ran the numbers once -- I've averaged $0.10 per mile for commuting in the Benz over the last 50,000 miles, which includes the cost of the vehicle + fuel + maintenance. Work is now less than 10 miles away, so I tripled that cost to account for professional maintenance instead of self maintenance, and to add a profit margin for 'ol Johnny himself. $0.10 * 10 miles * 3 = $3
__________________
'83 300DTurbo http://badges.fuelly.com/images/smallsig-us/318559.png Broadband: more lies faster. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The cost of maintenance is part of the bill you'll receive for using that service, and the cars can drive themselves to a depot owned by its owner at night to get maintenance done. Just thinking about how creepy Google will get when people use their self-driving car and Google gets to record you, listen to you and know exactly where you go, when you go and why you go, makes me uncomfortable. Big-data would love everyone to have a self-driving car.
__________________
"The MB W123 is so bulletproof, you can drive them forever. Which is a good thing as it takes that long to get anywhere." Betsie: 1984 W123 300D (hobby, 280k miles) Myrla: 2001 Mazda Protege 2.0 ES 5spd (daily driver, 130k miles) The Turd: 2007 Toyota Camry (wife's car, 118k miles) |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Im not bothered at all, in fact i find the march of progress invigorating. By the time im ready to retire, self driving technology will be reliable and widespread. Ill be able to doze my way around town by punching in coordinates.
If i feel the need to enjoy driving pleasure i will unveil one of my collection of tottering old fart relics to the amusement of my borg grandchildren who will be tweeting with their frontal lobes alone Whenever i think about the average car owner, im remided of Vincent Gallos hilarious rant against "shifter cars" in the otherwise mediocre movie Buffalo 66
__________________
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr. Last edited by JB3; 01-16-2016 at 09:35 PM. |
Bookmarks |
|
|