PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum

PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/)
-   Diesel Discussion (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/diesel-discussion/)
-   -   Looking at Getting a W124. Which Has the Best Highway MPG? (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/diesel-discussion/375868-looking-getting-w124-has-best-highway-mpg.html)

Skid Row Joe 03-01-2016 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sneaky98gt (Post 3574234)
Good afternoon everyone! My name is Will, first post here. I've already learned quite a bit reading around old threads here, but still looking for some advice. If this is in the wrong forum, I apologize in advance and hope someone will move it for me.

Skip down to the bottom for the TL;DR.

Before I start, just some quick info about myself. I've noticed there are lots of international people around here, so just to clarify, I'm in the 'States. North Carolina to be specific. Young guy, mechanical engineer, and plenty able to work on things myself. I've built the motor, transmission, and rear end in my supercharged Mustang. Also have rebuilt the engine in my daily driver, an '01 Honda Civic. The point of all this, is that I'm quite capable of working on something. That said, I don't like doing it all the time, and hence why I'm here.

I'm looking to replace my current daily driver, a manual transmission 2001 Civic. I've had it for many years now, but with almost 350,000 miles on the clock, it's getting to the point where it seems like I'm working on it every few weeks. Combine that with the fact that it is so unbelievably boring to drive, and that I'm no longer a broke college student, and I'm just ready to move on.

Some more info about me: I drive around 30,000 miles a year to and from work. Literally 95% of the drive is interstate, where I ride at 70 mph with the cruise control on. To keep my yearly fuel costs down, highway fuel economy is very important to me; my goal so far when looking at a new ride has been at least 30 mpg on the highway. I have been impressed with my Honda concerning fuel mileage and overall cost to operate, and after looking at lots of different cars, I decided on getting a 2006-2007 Honda Accord, 4 door, V6, with 6-speed manual. It hits the 30 mpg highway check box, pretty roomy inside, has a nice 240 horsepower, and a nice transmission. Also, at roughly a $7000 price tag, the depreciation won't kill me on it either.

Still, it's a pretty boring car, without any real 'soul', and $7000 is on the upper limit of what I'm willing to spend for a car being driven 30k-40k miles a year. Regardless, this is the baseline I'm comparing everything to.

Enter Mercedes. I hadn't considered one during my search for a couple of reasons. 1, I'm not a huge fan of German long-term quality (or at least my perception of it). And 2, (kinda related to #1), they aren't available in a manual, or at least are very rare. I plan on driving a DD until it has at least 300,000 miles, and I tend to believe that autos, on a percentage basis, don't hold up for that long nearly as well as a manual does.

BUT, after some first hand accounts and good ole internet research, I've come to decide that a W124 Mercedes may offer what I want in terms of reliability, and whatever it sacrifices in fuel mileage, it should more than make up for in terms of a sweet looking ride with a lot of soul, as well as quite a discounted entry price well below the $7000 tag of the Accord. That being said, I still want to make an educated decision.

Assuming gas averages $2.50 a gallon over the next 3-4 years (it's currently $1.50 here, but I'm assuming it'll go up a good bit), the Accord would cost $2500 a year to drive to and from work. If I got 25 mpg from an old gas-burner W124, that yearly cost would be $3000 a year. Assuming I got the Merc for a good bit less than $7000 (which seems very reasonable), that'd be a breakeven point of several years, which I'm perfectly OK with. I'd prefer to go diesel, but it is roughly 25% more expensive here, so I'd need to get roughly 32 mpg from a diesel to equal the driving cost of a gas version (assuming it got 25 on the highway).



So, the TL;DR. What is the best gas model W124 for fuel mileage? Best diesel model for fuel mileage? Are my proposed numbers above possible (25 mpg for gas, 32 for diesel)? What are reasonable numbers I can expect on the highway at 70 mph? Best for reliability (I hear they're all roughly the same, just little quirks here and there)? I'm not particularly keen on the post-facelift models, so I want to keep it prior to 1993 or whenever they changed over. While more power is virtually always better, I'm ok sacrificing some in exchange for fuel economy.

From my reading, it looks like my best gas bet is a 260E or 300E 2.6, and my best bet with a diesel is the 90-93 300D with the turbo 2.5. Opinions?

Is $3000 going to get a decent gas model? $4000 for a decent diesel? Knowing that I plan to keep this and put at least a couple hundred thousand miles on over the coming years, I don't really want anything over 150k miles. Around 100k would be preferable, but I know those are getting rare and I'd have to pay for it.

Also, is it an option / worthwhile to swap a taller geared rear diff from some other model? I'd assume that the V8 models might have taller gears, and swapping those into a I6 or diesel model would potentially help highway fuel economy out quite a bit.

Thanks in advance for the help!

For your budget and the highest MB diesel mpg, I'd set my sights on finding an 05/06 E320 CDI W211. No other MB diesel gets the mpg that the CDIs do - especially on the open road at high speeds above 40 plus mpg consistently! I'd make it a priority getting in one of these for the long term, were it me.

83w126 03-01-2016 01:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by babymog (Post 3575601)
Man, you have a dismal view of diesel 124s, I've had all good luck with transmissions.


Sorry, I don't mean to say the nice ones people have and take care of well are junk, but the ones on Craigslist for $3500 are usually pretty bad. I still have a bad memory of test driving a 95 w124 diesel and almost hitting hit at a stoplight several times because it wouldn't move when you tried to accelerate. Car shopping always sucks though, I can't really think of any good options to look at once I get the dead w210 out of my driveway.

Deplore 03-01-2016 05:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 83w126 (Post 3575588)
As far as the W210, I suppose that the dealer isn't necessary, but there is too much you can't do at home, and that's why I don't like them. The fact that i can't fix mine without having it towed to the dealer or other shop (which with the difference in distance would end up costing the same whether I paid in labor or towing bill) is why I don't want it any more.

Wat. W210 is the next simplest mercedes. You only need the SDS/Xentry for the transmission and airbag issues. Everything else can be fixed with a generic code reader and the climate control code reader. Even then, there's the carsoft program that can read the transmission/airbag/ABS codes....and it costs less than $100.

You want complicated? Go look at a W221. Literally everything needs a SDS. I can only wonder how tough a W222 is. W210 is absurdly simple to maintain and requires little to no special tools.

But whatever, seems that you have a special hatred for MB and autos.

JimFreeh 03-01-2016 07:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jbach36 (Post 3575606)
The 1995 has a bigger tank, something like 22 gallons rather than 18 in the other W124's. It doesn't mean it gets better gas mileage, it just means it stores more fuel.

The 95 E300 tank will backfit into other W124s. My 91 300D 2.5 turbo had the 95 tank. I recall it's 24 gallons... It was nice to have the range on the 95 and 91 diesels, but my current 05 CDI goes a lot further on less fuel.

Jim

sneaky98gt 03-01-2016 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 97 SL320 (Post 3575158)
Sounds like you have things worked out pretty well. A few more points.

Being a landlord is lots of work, being one long distance can be an issue so take that into consideration if you move and rent the old house.

It's good that you are getting some $ from room mates but don't count on that income, they can leave in a split second and change your situation.

While not part of your original question it was eluded to in your above post. You are applying rational thinking to $ however here is another consideration. Given you lived like a poor college student in the past run the numbers at to what financial situation you would be if you continued to do so until your house ( and other debt if any ) was paid off early. Early pay off results in interest you don't have to pay.

Going into debt for a house is pretty unavoidable, however all other forms of debt are. Student loans , car loans, credit card debt are all things that will drag you down long term and are difficult to get on top of the farther down the line one goes.

My folks have several rental properties. Based on the amount of time as a young 'un I spent helping them clean up ones as people moved out, I've got an idea on the amount of work they can be. Lol.

I'm not using the money I'm currently making from my roommates in my monthly budget. Half of it is going towards the principle on the house (to pay it off early), and the other half is going into savings for a down payment on the next house.

And yes, I'm still very much living like a college student. I graduated with no debt of any kind (student loans, CC, car payments, etc.), which is most of the reason why I was able to buy a house so early. This car I'm looking to buy to replace the Civic is going to be the first time I've spent more than maybe $1000 since graduating.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 97 SL320 (Post 3575298)
On the auto trans "" Are there parts kits and/or write ups out there on how to do this? ""

There are 3 auto transmissions for that era, others can tell you what specific one is used.

722.3 large 4 speed
722.4 small 4 speed version of the .3
722.5 large 5 speed version of the .3 ( not common, typically only found on the 300SL and 300 CE behind a 24 V inline 6 gas motor )

Taking an auto trans apart and putting it back together isn't terribly difficult for a mechanically minded person. There are some picture heavy threads on this site. Yes, there are lots of parts but then tend to be packaged in sections. There are some parts that can physically fit flipped over but will only operate properly in one direction so pay attention to disassembly.

The difficulty is in finding what _caused_ the failure and not just identifying the parts that were damaged. The upper half ( gear train / frictions. ) can be visually inspected, the lower half ( Valve body , governor ) is more subtle in failure and can cause failures in the upper half.

ATSG prints trans repair books that are used by professional shops. These books are ~ $ 20 + and are worth the purchase as they typically have lots of real world hints and info that can be difficult to find in a manufacturers service manual. The manufacturers service manual is a good idea too as not everything is in the ATSG manual. And, both manuals assume that the reader has some sort of trans experience.

I figured there hopefully would be. I rebuilt the transmission in my Mustang, during which I learned that it isn't nearly as complicated as most make out. But then again, with there being millions of 4R70Ws out there, there was also LOTS of info and writeups on how to do it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 97 SL320 (Post 3575501)
A quick note on the Honda repair. While the head is off, consider changing the piston rings and rod bearings if you are going to keep this car any length of time.

There are a couple of things in play here as a mini engine rebuild will extend the overall life of the engine. Connecting rod bearings are the number one failure point on an engine. When you get a head on it with good valve seal, intake vacuum will now increase causing more oil to be drawn past the rings.

And, with new found power from good valve seal, floppy original low drag rings, the car tends to be driven harder but the bearings are worn to the point that the hydrodynamic wedge can't keep the bearing off the crank journal. The bearing touches the crank, material is rubbed off, oil clearance increases.

That's a good call, but I actually just did that about a year ago. It was burning over a quart of oil every gas tank (~400 miles). Turns out, all the oil rings were completely seized inside the piston.

Unfortunately, I screwed up and didn't go ahead and have a valve job done on the head while everything was apart. And now I'm reaping the consequences.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 83w126 (Post 3575588)
I am referring to the fact that buying a 95 E300D on Craigslist for $3k likely means none of the gauges work, the a/c doesn't work, the transmission is starting to slip, it needs glow plugs and at least one will snap taking them out, etc. Pleasant surprises certainly may happen, but probably shouldn't be a part of deciding if you can afford it.

I suppose we'll see. Hopefully going to look at one either tonight or tomorrow.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skid Row Joe (Post 3575613)
For your budget and the highest MB diesel mpg, I'd set my sights on finding an 05/06 E320 CDI W211. No other MB diesel gets the mpg that the CDIs do - especially on the open road at high speeds above 40 plus mpg consistently! I'd make it a priority getting in one of these for the long term, were it me.

Not happening. Way more money than I'm going to spend, and by the time the extra cost of diesel is factored in, it's not any more economical per mile than the Accord.

babymog 03-01-2016 08:28 AM

... if only there were a higher capacity tank for the wagons.

I agree that most used cars are frustrating and unreliable, especially at that price point. The key I feel, is the price point.
If you are looking at Tdi Jettas for $3,500, diesel Dodge Ram for $3,500, BMW anything for $3,500, etc. you will have a very hard time finding one that is reliable. Even a $3,500 Honda/Toyota will be pretty worn out and often neglected (have you looked at dealer prices on Honda & Toyota?).

But, if you find that gem, the one that is well maintained and loved, you should have a car that is reliable. If not, and you have the time/money/skills to make it nice, you still can have a reliable daily driver ... eventually.

83w126 03-01-2016 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by babymog (Post 3575680)
I agree that most used cars are frustrating and unreliable, especially at that price point. The key I feel, is the price point.
If you are looking at Tdi Jettas for $3,500, diesel Dodge Ram for $3,500, BMW anything for $3,500, etc. you will have a very hard time finding one that is reliable. Even a $3,500 Honda/Toyota will be pretty worn out and often neglected (have you looked at dealer prices on Honda & Toyota?).

I completely agree, its not that most of them are bad cars, they are just all really worn out. The line between more expensive and complicated cars in no better condition and a car that could likely go another 50k miles without much trouble is quite a bit higher than that though, so you just have to pick one that you can afford to purchase and fix most of the usual problems, and hope for the best.

Is there really a way to clear w210 transmission codes for less than $400 (assuming that a tow to and from the nearest shop and an hour labor would be in that range too)? Thats why I feel like trying to fix it is unreasonable, if that isn't the ase it may change my mind.

vstech 03-01-2016 10:08 AM

I have seen EXTREMELY RARE examples of the 05 CDI's sold for 3-5K...

martureo 03-01-2016 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jbach36 (Post 3575606)
The 1995 has a bigger tank, something like 22 gallons rather than 18 in the other W124's. It doesn't mean it gets better gas mileage, it just means it stores more fuel.

24 actually.

(And diesels rarely get good gas mileage)

Deplore 03-01-2016 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 83w126 (Post 3575693)
I

Is there really a way to clear w210 transmission codes for less than $400 (assuming that a tow to and from the nearest shop and an hour labor would be in that range too)? Thats why I feel like trying to fix it is unreasonable, if that isn't the ase it may change my mind.

High Quality New MB Carsoft 7 4 Multiplexer Car MB Carsoft 7 4 Diagnostic Tool | eBay

Might be cheaper than towing both ways.

Skid Row Joe 03-01-2016 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sneaky98gt (Post 3575678)
My folks have several rental properties. Based on the amount of time as a young 'un I spent helping them clean up ones as people moved out, I've got an idea on the amount of work they can be. Lol.

I'm not using the money I'm currently making from my roommates in my monthly budget. Half of it is going towards the principle on the house (to pay it off early), and the other half is going into savings for a down payment on the next house.

And yes, I'm still very much living like a college student. I graduated with no debt of any kind (student loans, CC, car payments, etc.), which is most of the reason why I was able to buy a house so early. This car I'm looking to buy to replace the Civic is going to be the first time I've spent more than maybe $1000 since graduating.



I figured there hopefully would be. I rebuilt the transmission in my Mustang, during which I learned that it isn't nearly as complicated as most make out. But then again, with there being millions of 4R70Ws out there, there was also LOTS of info and writeups on how to do it.



That's a good call, but I actually just did that about a year ago. It was burning over a quart of oil every gas tank (~400 miles). Turns out, all the oil rings were completely seized inside the piston.

Unfortunately, I screwed up and didn't go ahead and have a valve job done on the head while everything was apart. And now I'm reaping the consequences.



I suppose we'll see. Hopefully going to look at one either tonight or tomorrow.



Not happening. Way more money than I'm going to spend, and by the time the extra cost of diesel is factored in, it's not any more economical per mile than the Accord.

05/06 E320 CDIs are available sub-$5K.. I believe you wrote "$4,000" for a 90s diesel. Strictly on dollars, the CDI would be the better value play.

Skid Row Joe 03-01-2016 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vstech (Post 3575702)
I have seen EXTREMELY RARE examples of the 05 CDI's sold for 3-5K...

Several examples have been sub-$5,000.00. There's one linked to in the Craigslist alert thread in the $3,000.00 range, IIRC...

Skid Row Joe 03-01-2016 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by babymog (Post 3575680)
... if only there were a higher capacity tank for the wagons.

I agree that most used cars are frustrating and unreliable, especially at that price point. The key I feel, is the price point.
If you are looking at Tdi Jettas for $3,500, diesel Dodge Ram for $3,500, BMW anything for $3,500, etc. you will have a very hard time finding one that is reliable. Even a $3,500 Honda/Toyota will be pretty worn out and often neglected (have you looked at dealer prices on Honda & Toyota?).

But, if you find that gem, the one that is well maintained and loved, you should have a car that is reliable. If not, and you have the time/money/skills to make it nice, you still can have a reliable daily driver ... eventually.

X2

The price point in the sub-$5K range are just as described for the mostpart. I would expect to spend quite a bit of time and or money on them as a whole in general - making most of them reliable.

sneaky98gt 03-01-2016 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skid Row Joe (Post 3575745)
05/06 E320 CDIs are available sub-$5K.. I believe you wrote "$4,000" for a 90s diesel. Strictly on dollars, the CDI would be the better value play.

I admittedly haven't done more than a quick look on Autotrader and CL, but I think I saw 1 or maybe 2 listed below $7500. One had like 270k miles, and the other had around 340k miles, IIRC.

I wouldn't be surprised if there are some out there for $4000-$5000, but honestly, I think I'd prefer a $4000 '95 year model anything with 100k miles than a $4000 '05 year model of the same make with 300k miles. I could easily be flawed in my logic, but I feel a couple hundred thousand more miles is going to hurt worse than 10 years of age when it comes to long term reliability. Especially when the older model already has a pretty strong reputation of being well built.

Also, I disagree with the earlier comment about $3500 not getting anything reliable. The exact cars listed in that example are all vehicles known to drive a premium for no reason other than their name, and in those specific cases, the comment is pretty much true; $3500 is going to get you a completely ragged out, worn out heap that will cost more than it's worth to keep driving it.

But these days, $3500 can buy a pretty darn nice (relatively speaking) Japanese or even some domestic cars. With the economy picking back up, and folks having a little more money to spend, there are LOTS of people moving into newer cars (regardless of how good or bad an idea that is). That's leaving a bunch of say early to mid 2000s year model cars up for sale. $4000 can buy a bunch of different rides with under 100k miles on the clock and not a thing wrong with the car.

I suppose the question here is whether or not a '95 model MB is in the first group of cars I described, or the 2nd.

sneaky98gt 03-01-2016 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by martureo (Post 3575719)
24 actually.

(And diesels rarely get good gas mileage)

The first time I read your post, I thought you were making a comment about expected fuel economy. And I got a little worried seeing as how you have/had a 95 and didn't think it did very good.

Then I read it again, and lol-ed.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website