Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 04-01-2016, 08:06 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,534
Quote:
Originally Posted by babymog View Post
. . . . my question / comment was whether this could cause a problem (such as the regulator sensing 0V and going full output).
The wire that runs from the bulb to alternator exists only to wake up the alternator and provide visual indication that it isn't charging.

Dropping power here when the engine is running won't cause a problem as the regulator is already awake. Battery charging voltage is sensed at the alternator output wire. Some alternators have a separate sending wire that runs near the battery connection. This is done to minimize low system voltage due to voltage drop at high currents.

Leaving power applied with a stopped engine will only serve to drain the battery.

This trigger wire isn't always needed, many alternators will begin to charge if engine speed is raised to say 2000 to get things going. If the engine is brought back to idle, the alternator will continue to charge.

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-01-2016, 08:14 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mxfrank View Post
First of all, there is quite a bit of misinformation on this thread, some of it is wrong, some is just ridiculous.

You can place a resistor in series with the BULB to give you a back up in case the bulb fails. However, this component is obviously not in series with the bulb.
.
Do you mean in parallel? In series would be open circuit if either one bust.
__________________
Not MBZ nor A/C trained professional but a die-hard DIY and green engineer. Use the info at your own peril. Picked up 2 Infractions because of disagreements. NOW reversed.

W124 Keyless remote, PM for details. http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/mercedes-used-parts-sale-wanted/334620-fs-w124-chasis-keyless-remote-%2450-shipped.html

1 X 2006 CDI
1 x 87 300SDL
1 x 87 300D
1 x 87 300TDT wagon
1 x 83 300D
1 x 84 190D ( 5 sp ) - All R134 converted + keyless entry.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-01-2016, 10:04 PM
Tom Evans
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 180
The part in question is definitely a resistor. Bosch even refers to it as a resistor in their literature. The color bands say it is a 120 ohm resistor which is what it reads.

Here's something more that is puzzling. It appears that only the 55 amp/28 MM slip ring model has the resistor. The 65 amp/32 MM slip ring model does not have the resistor.
__________________
Tom Evans
69 280SE 91K (wish I still had it)
73 220D 98K
78 300D 134K
78 300D 185K
81 300SD 301K (still have)
82 300SD 321K (still have)
84 300D 268K
84 6.2 Diesel GMC Suburban 225K (a whole different story!)
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-01-2016, 10:17 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,944
Quote:
Originally Posted by ah-kay View Post
Do you mean in parallel? In series would be open circuit if either one bust.

Yes, I fixed my post.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-01-2016, 11:30 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,944
Here are the three regulators. From left to right, a KAE and two from factory rebuilds, probably WAI's. The one on the right has the mystery component. The other two seem to have provision for the component, but nothing is installed.

I desoldered the mystery part and cleaned it up. It's marked 68 ohms L3, 5%, it's also marked RB59B. Finally, there is a manufacturer's mark, but it's illegible. Resistance measures 68 ohms on the nose. It may be a wirewound, so maybe it's used as a choke. Don't know, and can't find a reference for it.
Attached Thumbnails
Resistor Across Alternator Rotor Winding-boschvr.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 04-03-2016, 09:40 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,944
AAAARRRRGGGGH! After giving it much thought, I think I've figured it out. But first, discarded ideas:

- back up path for bootstrap current: it's not in the right place for this

- radio suppression: it's really an odd component in an odd place if this is the intent

- surge suppression for the rotor coil: aside from being in the wrong place, why not use a reverse bias diode and do it right?

- current limiter or voltage divider. Just not in the right place for either function.

- Heat compensation. Aside from being in the wrong place, it's not a thermistor. If anything, it makes the alternator run hotter.

So here it is...wait for it...






In the end, the simplest explanation works best. If the rotor or regulator fails, goes completely open for any reason, the resistor provides an alternate path to ground for the dash light. Otherwise, there would be no indication that the alternator has failed. I don't know why it's in some regulators and not others. It might be that some regulators accomplish this with internal circuitry. It's a pretty inefficient way to do it. When the alternator is operating normally, the resistor is a useless load that generates lots of internal heat. No wonder they call them idiot lights.
Attached Thumbnails
Resistor Across Alternator Rotor Winding-failure.jpg  

Last edited by Mxfrank; 04-03-2016 at 10:00 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-03-2016, 11:22 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mxfrank View Post
First of all, there is quite a bit of misinformation on this thread, some of it is wrong, some is just ridiculous.
This statement holds true, very true.
__________________
Not MBZ nor A/C trained professional but a die-hard DIY and green engineer. Use the info at your own peril. Picked up 2 Infractions because of disagreements. NOW reversed.

W124 Keyless remote, PM for details. http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/mercedes-used-parts-sale-wanted/334620-fs-w124-chasis-keyless-remote-%2450-shipped.html

1 X 2006 CDI
1 x 87 300SDL
1 x 87 300D
1 x 87 300TDT wagon
1 x 83 300D
1 x 84 190D ( 5 sp ) - All R134 converted + keyless entry.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-03-2016, 12:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,534
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mxfrank
First of all, there is quite a bit of misinformation on this thread, some of it is wrong, some is just ridiculous.
I'm just surprised that someone didn't post that the resistor was to provide a gravity path so the electrons can fall to ground. Given many German wiring diagrams have positive at the top and ground at the bottom it has to be true.

Quote:
If the rotor or regulator fails, goes completely open for any reason, the resistor provides an alternate path to ground for the dash light.
See also post 13.

Also, has anyone physically verified that the resistor is on the + side of the field? I'm going to have to dig up my old regulator and trace the circuit down. I thought mine was to establish a minimum charging level / backup in case the regulator fails open.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-03-2016, 04:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,944
Quote:
Originally Posted by 97 SL320 View Post

See also post 13.

Also, has anyone physically verified that the resistor is on the + side of the field? I'm going to have to dig up my old regulator and trace the circuit down. I thought mine was to establish a minimum charging level / backup in case the regulator fails open.
Yes, post 13 is also completely off the track. This resistor has no bearing on charge level at all. It's located just as shown in the OP's diagram, providing a path between D+ and ground. The normal ground path for the light is through the voltage regulator/field circuit via D+. In the event this path is open for some reason, this resistor allows the indicator to find ground and light up. That's all it does.


How about that...I've even found an official reference for it!

http://apps.bosch.com.au/AAExtranet_TechSearch/docs/repairinstruction/regsB9-0.pdf
Attached Thumbnails
Resistor Across Alternator Rotor Winding-resistor.jpg  

Last edited by Mxfrank; 04-03-2016 at 06:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-03-2016, 07:03 PM
Tom Evans
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 180
I just got out from under the car after trying a couple of different VRs. I took a VR with a resistor removed and tried it. No problem with operation whatsoever.

I checked six VRs, four with resistors and two without. The internal circuitry is different between the two versions. Measuring between the two terminals where the resistor is connected yields different results. The resistor version indicates that there is a semiconductor junction (diode, transistor) between the resistor pins. The non-resistor version indicates that there is a fixed resistance (~ 4K ohm) between the pins.

Bottom line, it looks like either version will work.

Thanks to MxFrank for the Bosch article.
__________________
Tom Evans
69 280SE 91K (wish I still had it)
73 220D 98K
78 300D 134K
78 300D 185K
81 300SD 301K (still have)
82 300SD 321K (still have)
84 300D 268K
84 6.2 Diesel GMC Suburban 225K (a whole different story!)
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-03-2016, 07:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,534
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mxfrank View Post
Yes, post 13 is also completely off the track.

How?

Quote:
The way you have it drawn is it a ground path for the alternator not charging light.

The current would normally flow through the field but if the brushes have failed there isn't a path. In normal operation, once the engine is running, voltage at the diode trio ( where the light is attached ) matches the light and the light goes out. ( + 12 V on both sides of the light )
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-03-2016, 11:54 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,944
Quote:
Originally Posted by 97 SL320 View Post
How?
Well, for one thing it IS a ground for the "charging light", which it why it terminates on D+. The reason it's a resistor and not a length of wire is specifically because you don't want to dead ground the alternator. But let's complete the quote:

Quote:
On my 97 C280 / SL320 I'm pretty sure the resistor is from the regulator side of the field and ground. In that case it acts to set a minimum charging level. This should limit voltage variation and keep the car going in the event of a regulator failure.
This just isn't the way it works. If you look carefully at the diagram, you can see that this is a "A" circuit regulator, meaning that it controls field ground. In order to serve as a back up mechanism, you would need to locate the resistor between the negative side of the field coil and D-. The resistor would need to be inside the can, bridging the power transistor. The resistor would also need to have a much larger value, because whatever voltage is applied across the field has to always be low enough to keep the alternator from running away. I'm not sure it could be made to work safely.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-04-2016, 07:07 AM
babymog's Avatar
Loose Cannon - No Balls
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Northeast Indiana
Posts: 10,765
So if I'm reading this correctly Frank, this resistor is to provide an idiot light in the case where (common failure) the brushes lose contact, and you are not charging, ... where previous designs did not illuminate the light? BTDT, IMO it was a poor design and I had that failure when my car was only 3y/o, with no ammeter and no voltmeter the only indication that I had that my car was not charging (on Christmas Eve, at night, in a blizzard, in the middle of nowhere, with my family in the car, ...), was that the ABS/SRS lights came on!
__________________

Gone to the dark side

- Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-04-2016, 09:18 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,944
The resistor would offer enhanced indicator functionality in the case of a brush failure. (We're not allowed to say that anything OEM was a poor design.)
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-04-2016, 09:53 AM
babymog's Avatar
Loose Cannon - No Balls
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Northeast Indiana
Posts: 10,765
... you weren't out with your family in you fairly-new $74,000 best in the world wagon in a blizzard, stranded without warning, ... or you might bend that rule.

But I can agree that this made it a more robust design, ... than the original design. Better?

__________________

Gone to the dark side

- Jeff
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page