|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Synthetic ATF and Longer Intervals
Hi All,
Tomorrow, I am changing my transmission fluid in my 1984 300D and planning to use fully synthetic ATF. I'm thinking about extending the interval between transmission flushes to 45,000 miles. Is anyone else extending their service intervals with synthetic? It would also be interesting to see if there is any real-life data on the topic of putting synthetic in an older transmission and how long it lasts. Dkr. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Yeah, I finally switched to Shell ATF 134 on the 91 300D (also use it in the W210 and W211) and will be extending drain intervals. Rather than do a complete drain at a longer interval, I will probably suck out 2.5 quarts at shorter intervals. Just easier than messing with the pan.
__________________
14 E250 Bluetec "Sinclair", Palladium Silver on Black, 153k miles 06 E320 CDI "Rutherford", Black on Tan, 171k mi, Stage 1 tune, tuned TCU 91 300D "Otis", Smoke Silver, 142k mi, wastegate conversion 19 Honda CR-V EX 61k mi Fourteen other MB's owned and sold 1961 Very Tolerant Wife Last edited by shertex; 12-11-2016 at 07:44 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I'm pretty sure that synthetic is specified for W210 and later cars. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I don't have any scientific data, but it runs fine and that's good for me. .
__________________
1983 123.133 California - GreaseCar Veg System |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
I would say yes to longer intervals, but the problem you will find with an older trans is possibly more slip and more friction material starting to clog your filter, not fluid degradation.
__________________
Gone to the dark side - Jeff |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
That's not a problem with an older transmission.
It is a problem with a transmission that has not been properly maintained. Dkr. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Syn or Dino ATF
I found that syn atf made for a noisier (noticeable) trans.
I changed out the fluid at 12,000 miles post rebuild (Sun Valley) thinking I'd go 25k or more between filter/atf changes. Trans seemed to "whine" a bit in neutral, first, and reverse gears. Got a little worried and changed the fluid back to dino atf. No more whine. I double checked with Sun Valley Trans who reported that syn atf may result in increased trans noise but won't hurt it, and syn helps with heat dissipation.
__________________
1986 300SDL 440,xxx |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
I'd be more worried about filter intervals than fluid intervals.
It's like changing over to syn from dino on an engine - the engine ultimately won't care to have the superior syn in it. You're just going to have filter degradation running extended intervals. If we're speaking MB, synthetic oils use a fleece (polyester, etc) filter rather than paper filters found in these older cars. By the time you reach that higher mileage interval, your paper filter has broken apart or collapsed. I have a few instances up on my blog: W211: Please maintain your cars....... ~ Artisan PreviousOwner: Oil Filter ~ Artisan As to the original point of this thread - I honestly wouldn't be too worried running a trans 45K miles on synthetic. Just depends how long it sits in there, is all. 45k miles in 2-3 years is cool, any longer than that, I'd be changing out fluids/filters on principle. Who knows what's going on in there.
__________________
Allen Kroliczek Oak Grove Autosport | Oak Grove Autosport 01 G500, 82 300TD, quite a few more..... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I would agree with that. If you were driving less than 10 - 15K miles a year, I think there would be a lot less benefit to using synthetic ATF. My understanding was the filter was mostly overkill and that if you were trapping a lot of metal particles something seriously was wrong with the transmission. My NPR truck just has a basic strainer in the transmission and from what I have heard it generally doesn't have much of anything even after 100K miles.
Dkr. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Guess I never checked the owner's manual. My old Chryslers say no need to ever change tranny fluid except taxi and police cars. I assumed my M-B were the same, i.e. if the fluid is still clear red and no burnt smell, it is fine. I sure wouldn't change more often than 50K miles, even 100K mi sounds too soon. M-B isn't paying for the fluid so they can say whatever at no cost to them. I understand that ATF+4 (Chrysler) is fully synthetic, so might be an option for only $1/qt more than Dexron III.
__________________
1984 & 1985 CA 300D's 1964 & 65 Mopar's - Valiant, Dart, Newport 1996 & 2002 Chrysler minivans |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
No. I second babymog on friction material getting into the fluid. I ran Mobil 1 synthetic and I thought I could get away with a 45k interval because it was synthetic. Wrong. I got a howling in my trans. I took off the filter and it was clogged with non magnetic sludge.
I had the tranny rebuilt at Sun Valley transmission. One of the best 722.x rebuilders out there. They said clogging the filter will kill the bushing on the pump as it gets starved for lubrication. Once that goes you loose pressure and you damage your friction plates which in turn dump more material into your fluid. See where this is going? Positive feedback. My bushing was loose and making noise according to their diagnosis. Marc the owner stressed that fluid should be changed at 24k intervals. I will take his advice given his track record with MB transmissions.
__________________
79 300TD “Old Smokey” AKA “The Mistake” (SOLD) 82 240D stick shift 335k miles (SOLD) 82 300SD 300k miles 85 300D Turbodiesel 170k miles |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
I go 80000 max miles,with mobil one.
__________________
1999 w140, quit voting to old, and to old to fight, a god damned veteran |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting....it is not really the fluid that breaks down, it is the contaminates that eventually clog the system.
__________________
-- Chris '95 E300, 216k miles, Silver Surfer '05 E320 CDI, 138k miles '07 S550 4matic, 69k miles Gone but not forgotten: '76 300D, 350k miles?, SOLD in 1995 '75 240D, 300k miles, SOLD in 1991 |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I wouldn't necessarily call it overkill, more of a first line of defense. The clutches will always have some sort of particulate coming off of them when they're NOT in use and all of that will usually end up at the bottom of the pan or in the filter. I'd rather have it stuck to the pan (MB sells a magnet that goes around the drain on the pan) or in the filter - screw having all those little particles clogging up my valve body! As for those guys running their fluid endlessly - mental note: stay the hell away from purchasing your cars down the road! lol Edit: Should clarify - clutches not in use, when the system allows them to free wheel
__________________
Allen Kroliczek Oak Grove Autosport | Oak Grove Autosport 01 G500, 82 300TD, quite a few more..... Last edited by bsmuwk; 12-17-2016 at 06:25 PM. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
I mistakenly went about 100K on one fill of Redline synthetic ATF on my 95 E300D. When I dropped the pan to finally change filter and fluid it was totally clear, (OK still red, but clear) with zero mud in the pan. Was running the same trans at 467K, only problem was a 2-3 flare which was easily dealt with by backing off the throttle at the 2-3 shift.
Chris W. ex 95 E300D, 467K
__________________
Objects in closer are mirror than they appear. |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|