|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Is there a w123 transmission mount test?
Did my engine mounts, one was somewhat compressed (not terribly but to be expected). Engine stop and AT mount look great. But if I’m doing other work, would like to determine if they are needed. I guess I could do them anytime in the future... but is there a “simple” test besides their look, to see if replacement is prudent?
__________________
Current Diesels: 1981 240D (73K) 1982 300CD (169k) 1985 190D (169k) 1991 350SD (113k) 1991 350SD (206k) 1991 300D (228k) 1993 300SD (291k) 1993 300D 2.5T (338k) 1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k) 1996 Dodge Ram CTD (265k) Past Diesels: 1983 300D (228K) 1985 300D (233K) |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
I check to see if mounts are compressed or coming apart, as well as give them a few good pokes to see how soft they are. Every mount I've touched on my '79 240D has been bad (pretty much rock solid), which probably was exasperated by the 4 cylinder vibrating more than the 5 cylinder would. I had low compression on one cylinder (when the OM616 still ran) which made the shaking worse.
I like to replace all the mounts.
__________________
Milan Brown 1979 240D, rebuilt OM617.952 turbo diesel, rebuilt 722.315 transmission (my only daily driver) Instagram: @maximed93 |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
That’s the thing. My 240d is really clean and always garage kept. Low miles.
The rubber is soft and not cracked. Which is what makes it confusing to me. I get the general concept to replace everything, but given the quality of many parts anymore due to offshoring, I might be better off keeping the OE part. Was kind of thinking if the height and location of the through bolt on the mount, relative to the hardware on the crossmember, might be indicative of sag or compression. The image above would indicate to me that the mount is good...
__________________
Current Diesels: 1981 240D (73K) 1982 300CD (169k) 1985 190D (169k) 1991 350SD (113k) 1991 350SD (206k) 1991 300D (228k) 1993 300SD (291k) 1993 300D 2.5T (338k) 1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k) 1996 Dodge Ram CTD (265k) Past Diesels: 1983 300D (228K) 1985 300D (233K) |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The corner on the left of the pic looks like you had a fluid leak on it softened and swelled a little.
__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
I’ll have to look again. As I recall, that’s the thin clear semi-glossy coating that flakes off.
But noted and need to look again. Even if so, it’s not apparent to me that the mount has sagged or failed.
__________________
Current Diesels: 1981 240D (73K) 1982 300CD (169k) 1985 190D (169k) 1991 350SD (113k) 1991 350SD (206k) 1991 300D (228k) 1993 300SD (291k) 1993 300D 2.5T (338k) 1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k) 1996 Dodge Ram CTD (265k) Past Diesels: 1983 300D (228K) 1985 300D (233K) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Perhaps not perfect but appears quite serviceable. I doubt a meaningful test really exists. Badly rotted or really compressed I would think otherwise. It is also not a situation where that part is going to leave you stranded on the side of the road.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
That said, there are issues with quality on new parts. Cheap motor mounts lasted me 8 months before collapsing worse than the old ones. I got a new trans mount (granted, it was from autozone) for my '96 Civic about 3 months ago and it's already gone bad. I do beat the crap out of that car daily, but a motor or trans mount should last longer than 3 months.
__________________
Milan Brown 1979 240D, rebuilt OM617.952 turbo diesel, rebuilt 722.315 transmission (my only daily driver) Instagram: @maximed93 |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
I'm assuming you also have the manual transmission?
My mount looked similar before I replaced it... and now I honestly can't tell much difference, if any at all.
__________________
1981 240D 4sp manual. Ivory White. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
You will notice bad mounts way more in an auto than in a manual.
__________________
Milan Brown 1979 240D, rebuilt OM617.952 turbo diesel, rebuilt 722.315 transmission (my only daily driver) Instagram: @maximed93 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
When I purchased my 220D the PO didn't have a transmission mount attached at all.
I installed one and the bracket from my spare parts stash and lo and behold.. there is no difference in feeling. Go figure. (manual trans) |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Mine is an AT.
__________________
Current Diesels: 1981 240D (73K) 1982 300CD (169k) 1985 190D (169k) 1991 350SD (113k) 1991 350SD (206k) 1991 300D (228k) 1993 300SD (291k) 1993 300D 2.5T (338k) 1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k) 1996 Dodge Ram CTD (265k) Past Diesels: 1983 300D (228K) 1985 300D (233K) |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
It looks ok, but if you're planning on doing any work on the drive shaft, I'd replace him while you're in there.
Replacing mine improved the coasting . Felt tighter. The mounts are cheap so why not? |
Bookmarks |
|
|