Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-05-2020, 05:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 441
Coupe suspensions, 1982 vs 1984

I have 2 300CD coupes. Both US models. When I purchased the 1982, I was surprised when I noticed how much softer the 1982 suspension feels. I'm trying to figure out if it just because it is a different car and maybe it could use some stiffer shock absorbers. Or, did they change the suspension characteristics between these years? I like the tighter feel of my 1984 car better.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-05-2020, 09:00 PM
vwnate1's Avatar
Diesel Dandy
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sunny So. Cal. !
Posts: 7,718
Too Soft Ride

Prolly just worn out shocks, I hope the bushings & ball joints are O.K. .

Bilstein HD gas shocks for the win .
__________________
-Nate
1982 240D 408,XXX miles
Ignorance is the mother of suspicion and fear is the father

I did then what I knew how to do ~ now that I know better I do better
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-05-2020, 11:31 PM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,632
Quote:
Originally Posted by vwnate1 View Post
Prolly just worn out shocks, I hope the bushings & ball joints are O.K. .

Bilstein HD gas shocks for the win .
Exactly.
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-06-2020, 11:09 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by vwnate1 View Post
Prolly just worn out shocks, I hope the bushings & ball joints are O.K. .

Bilstein HD gas shocks for the win .
Tell me what different the Bilsteins do.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-06-2020, 11:11 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: NYC
Posts: 86
I too would like to know if there were any coupe suspension changes over the last few years??

When I got my '83 300CD I thought It was very soft. Was an all original car that sat in a garage, not much use with the previous owner of 25 years. The air cleaner element was dated 1985 made in West Germany!

Suspension rubber seems good, I see no cracking or wallowed out areas. Everything is tight and good. I put on new stock Bilstein's made no difference at all. Body rolls quite a bit if you take a corner just a little fast. Sway bar bushings/links all good.

Sounds like HD Bilstein's are the best option, wish I had gone that route.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-06-2020, 11:13 AM
Diseasel300's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 6,032
The Bilstein HD's have different valving than the "comfort" series, so they provide a greater damping. The result is a firmer ride without being rough. I run B4 HD's on my W126's and wouldn't run anything else. They maintain the "airplane-like" smoothness, but don't pitch, roll, porpoise, or jiggle as much as the softer shocks do.
__________________
Current stable:
1995 E320 149K (Nancy)
1983 500SL 120K (SLoL)

Black Sheep:
1985 524TD 167K (TotalDumpster™)

Gone but not forgotten:
1986 300SDL (RIP)
1991 350SD
1991 560SEL
1990 560SEL
1986 500SEL Euro (Rusted to nothing at 47K!)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-06-2020, 12:56 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 5,924
Shocks have always seemed more critical on Mercedes cars. They seem to me to be a more active component of the suspension than on a lot of automotive brands.

Blisteins only should be used. Because they do seem to cope and stay good for a long period of time. . Many other brands do not seem to last in that environment.

Not confined to Mercedes. Big North American shock absorber brands are good for about a month or so on the back end of some Volkswagon Jetttas.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-06-2020, 01:07 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 441
Is this the Bilstein you're talking about? Are there any other recommendations?

https://www.bilstein.com/us/en/product-search-detail/?ItemId=6761354355116284123&YearId=3758778375502942013&MakeId=7816025481999714769&ModelId=7817689993268135804&SubModelId=4194908274341715756
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-06-2020, 05:16 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Modesto CA
Posts: 4,087
For a step yet firmer, use the application for the 300SD of the same year (W126); dimensionally the same, but firmer valving.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-06-2020, 06:53 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: NYC
Posts: 86
Diseasel300,
Thanks for the explanation, I will switch to the HD bilstein's this summer and offer for sale the comforts in the classified section. I like the idea of keeping the "airplane-like" ride but with less 'pitch, roll, porpoising, jiggling that it does now.' You put that well.

Barry12345
Some years ago Midas Muffler had a huge shock sale, I had all four of their best Monroe's installed on my 1 ton Chevy van. They were a joke, I went a mile turned around and said you put half ton shocks on. They didn't. Switched to KYB monomax which I liked, but as you said... did not last.

Gregp1969
Could your '84 coupe already have the HD Bilstein's compared to the'82? I do wonder if Mercedes changed to firmer shocks in '84-85 as standard?
Anybody know?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-07-2020, 10:59 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Reiner View Post
For a step yet firmer, use the application for the 300SD of the same year (W126); dimensionally the same, but firmer valving.
I'm trying to decide if "a step yet firmer" would be too firm. I like the way my '84 rides. It's not stiff or too firm. But, not sloppy either.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-07-2020, 11:46 AM
Diseasel300's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 6,032
I made the mistake of going TOO firm on the SL. The shocks are there to damp wheel movement and eliminate oscillation of the coil springs. They will NOT affect body roll or handling any more than the suspension is designed for. The anti-roll bars and spring rate determine how much roll and how "stiff" the suspension is overall. If you put too stiff of shocks in, you just make the ride rough. The shocks in the SL are stiff enough that you can tell how many coats of paint are applied at a crosswalk. Stiffer shocks than OE will make the ride better, but too stiff will make it far worse.
__________________
Current stable:
1995 E320 149K (Nancy)
1983 500SL 120K (SLoL)

Black Sheep:
1985 524TD 167K (TotalDumpster™)

Gone but not forgotten:
1986 300SDL (RIP)
1991 350SD
1991 560SEL
1990 560SEL
1986 500SEL Euro (Rusted to nothing at 47K!)
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-07-2020, 12:03 PM
vwnate1's Avatar
Diesel Dandy
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sunny So. Cal. !
Posts: 7,718
Post Shock Firmness

It's a variable to each individual .

I like to drive quickly if not over fast so the increased firmness of Bilstien HD gas shocks over rides the slight increase in firmness .

I also use them in my truck and Nash Metropolitan .
__________________
-Nate
1982 240D 408,XXX miles
Ignorance is the mother of suspicion and fear is the father

I did then what I knew how to do ~ now that I know better I do better
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-07-2020, 12:06 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 5,924
Consider and investigate adding larger diameter sway bars. They will reduce the roll or lean on the corners. Many of todays cars have suspensions almost like go carts in comparison.

Mercedes of the 123 type at least have very deep suspension movements. As with many things a compromise design as we drive in general faster today than the engineers though at the time perhaps. They still hold the road well but there is substantial body and suspension movement on cornering.

Since anything you do is spending money. You want to check for any deterioration. Get the measuring referance from a Mercedes shop manual. Then check the body height to make sure it is right. You might have tired springs.

It was normal service procedure to change them around 100k in the fintail days at dealerships. I assume they measured body height first.

Another problem is at that time they did not make seats to maintain your position so the body has to be controlled in position with a little effort on corners. It may be subconsious. I just suspect we do it or they would not have redesigned the seats over the years. Seat belts help.

In a way it is like a medium size sail boat. It will take more than you are happy with before presenting any real issue.

Go to utube and watch some of the 123s manufactures videos. To get some ideal. If todays cars did that you would expect either to roll over or slide out.

Their front end geometry was somewhat different than other manufactures in the day as well. I found cars like my old fintail to be very sensitive to the tires on the front. It took me a few pairs until I found tires that did not create under steer. This did not seem to be a problem with the 114 or 123 chassis.

To me you are driving a car that was about the end of the line for Mercedes design of many things. Different than the competition. The suspension was also designed for service where the roads where dismal in many parts of the world. Where other cars would beat themselves to death in that service.

We just do not have the roads these cars are capable of surviving on. I have wondered why I like the 123 240ds so much. The lighter engine and transmission seem to change the ride and handling somewhat in my favor. Where the 123 300d with the heavier engine and transmission does not seem as nice to me for want of a better word. Or the 240d it is about the last car on the road you are forced to drive.

Newer cars also have substantially reduced sidewall depths. This is of course to reduce tire side roll. The extremes they have gone to present bent rim issues and lower tire life. Plus a harsher ride to me is overkill. Part of what you are feeling can also be low ply sidewall tires.. I use them on occasion to make the ride softer on some of our lightweight cars. I would not put them on a 123 model. I would not put them on any brand of medium to heavyweight car. Goodyear tire company I know sells a lot of them.

I am far from an expert on anything. So these are just the perceptions of thing I have observed over the many years.


Last edited by barry12345; 02-07-2020 at 12:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page