Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-18-2002, 12:22 PM
bigjoe
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
300 SDL or 350SDL, that is the question!

Am actively looking to buy one of these models, looking for 87-89 but ran into a 350SDL,91 model...have had some folks telling me to stay away from the 350and was wanting more backround from some experts...other owners. I am a former heavy truck mechanic and farmer and have been around diesels all my life.. currently own cummins diesel in dodge. please give as much info as possible so i can make an informed decision. technicians opinions welcome. This is my first post here, so thanks in advance to all who reply. Username is bigjoe, but my friends call me Shrek! see ya!

  #2  
Old 10-18-2002, 12:49 PM
BlueBabyBenz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 151
Do a search on `350SDL'.

You will find all the information you need. There has been extensive discussion, in depth on this forum.

Good luck!
__________________
MB 1986 190D in my past
MB 1987 300E on the street
MB 1994 'Smoke Silver' E420 in my driveway
1999 Mazda Miata in the fun stable
1964 E-Type Jaguar Coupe- Sold
1970 E-Type Jaguar Coupe- Sold
1968 Corvair Monza Conv. with Turbo Transplant- Sold
1986 Merkur Xr4ti- abandoned
various mundane American autos

If I'd known then what I know now...

Hell, I'd probably still have done it anyways.
  #3  
Old 10-18-2002, 01:05 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Southern California, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,538
The 3.5L OM603.97x engine was used from 1990-91 (on the W126 chasis) and 1992-95 (W140 chasis). About half of the engines would "oval out" the cylinders and/or bend a rod. It usually happened with low miles (say, under 100kmi) but not always. One of the warning signs is increased oil consumption that keeps getting worse and worse. Usually by the time you notice it's too late. The fix is either a new bottom end or a new engine, which will run $6k-$12k plus labor.

I copied the following from a newsletter on the problems with this engine:

This newsletter is being made available via the world wide web to all
those interested in the problems with the 3.5 liter turbodiesel engine
used in S-Class Mercedes between 1990 and 1995. It incorporates
significant new research and information and the input of several list
members since my last communication some time ago.

Briefly, this engine has problems. With distressing frequency these
engines show significant, grossly premature wear, requiring expensive
rebuilding. Symptoms are excessive oil consumption, mechanical noise,
smoke, and a throbbing idle. Diagnostic procedures usually reveal
that one or more cylinders have compression that is below
specification, with excessive variation in the compression among all
cylinders. Mechanical teardown frequently reveals cylinders that are
out of round and connecting rods that are bent. Catastrophic engine
failure has occurred quite often. These problems are clearly due to a
design defect that Mercedes refuses to acknowledge. These problems
can not be prevented with any sort of routine maintenance, nor can
they be forestalled with changes in driving behavior. In essence, the
engine self-destructs during normal operation. Symptoms have appeared
as early as 50,000 miles. Due to the expense of individual repairs,
Mercedes honors warranty repairs only after considerable pressure is
applied. Out-of-warranty claims are summarily rejected.
__________________
Paul S.

2001 E430, Bourdeaux Red, Oyster interior.
79,200 miles.

1973 280SE 4.5, 170,000 miles. 568 Signal Red, Black MB Tex. "The Red Baron".
  #4  
Old 10-18-2002, 01:08 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Southern California, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,538
So after reading the previous post, by all means, find a nice '86 or '87 300 SDL. The 300 SDL was not sold in '88 or '89.

They are very nice cars, and there are many members on this site who happily own them.
__________________
Paul S.

2001 E430, Bourdeaux Red, Oyster interior.
79,200 miles.

1973 280SE 4.5, 170,000 miles. 568 Signal Red, Black MB Tex. "The Red Baron".
  #5  
Old 10-18-2002, 01:47 PM
sixto's Avatar
smoke gets in your eyes
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 20,841
The 86-87 SDLs have problems of their own in the way of cylinder heads that develop cracks. I don't have data to suggest that the 603.96 head problem is more or less prevalent than the 603.97 cylinder and rod problem but there is more negative discussion around the 603.97 considering how few you see on the road.

Replacing a 603.96 head is a reasonable DIY job.

Sixto
91 300SE
87 300SDL
83 300SD
  #6  
Old 10-18-2002, 01:49 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Southern California, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,538
You might also include in your search the '81-'85 300 SD.

They have an all iron diesel engine, and are not known to have any problems.
__________________
Paul S.

2001 E430, Bourdeaux Red, Oyster interior.
79,200 miles.

1973 280SE 4.5, 170,000 miles. 568 Signal Red, Black MB Tex. "The Red Baron".
  #7  
Old 10-18-2002, 02:21 PM
TANK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
The 86-87 SDLs have problems of their own in the way of cylinder heads that develop cracks.
I don't consider this an issue worth the keystrokes considering many many cars today have aluminum heads with the same "chances." My car went up to 120dg a few times for various reasons and no problems here. Cast iron heads do crack as well, they are not bulletproof.
  #8  
Old 10-18-2002, 03:29 PM
turbodiesel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mine has also seen close to 120c on several occasions (hot hot days with AC up running a 5% grade at full throttle for 5 minutes).

My head is original as far as I can tell and I have no issues right now (knock on the zebrano wood).
  #9  
Old 10-18-2002, 03:37 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 1,006
Mercedes redesigned the head on the 603.960 engine three times and redesigned the head gasket 5-6 times. These engines are known to have head cracking problems more frequently than other aluminium head engines. However, it seems that 20% or so of these engines had head problems, whereas 50% or more of the 350's had bottom end problems. Fortunately, head replacement is much easier than a new bottom end. Most of these head problems occurred when excessive heat was introduced from the trap oxidizer (since removed) or from broken rad necks, etc.
__________________
Brian Toscano
  #10  
Old 10-18-2002, 03:47 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cape Cod Massachusetts
Posts: 1,427
Lightbulb How about....

So what you really want is a 92 -95 140 car with a blown engine into which you can put a 603.960 powerplant! All the 140's latest available bells and whistles and the second most dependable engine.
  #11  
Old 10-18-2002, 03:54 PM
turbodiesel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
SLOW. The W140 weighs in at ~4700lbs.
  #12  
Old 10-18-2002, 04:07 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 1,006
The 140 cars may look nice and ride well, but they are very complicated and MB has cut costs on some of those critical things like WIRING which are everywhere - to control all the electronics. Evaps fail faster on 140's that on previous models, etc.

I'd recommed a 86-87 300SDL for a balance of power, simplicity, and ride.
__________________
Brian Toscano
  #13  
Old 10-18-2002, 04:53 PM
sixto's Avatar
smoke gets in your eyes
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 20,841
Quote:
Originally posted by md21722
However, it seems that 20% or so of these engines had head problems, whereas 50% or more of the 350's had bottom end problems.
Is the emphasis on the 'seems?' 20% and 50% failure rates are astronomic even by Edsel standards. There's no way to avoid a class action suit when it gets that bad.

I'd expect about as much flap as were hear now with 2% and 5% failure rates.

Sixto
91 300SE
87 300SDL
83 300SD
... 1 in 5 or 1 in 50... either way, I have a new head
  #14  
Old 10-18-2002, 08:09 PM
engatwork's Avatar
busy
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Soperton, Ga. USA
Posts: 13,635
Being a farmer and a diesel mechanic you need to get a 1981-1985 300SD in very good to excellent condition. You will not regret it .
__________________
Jim
  #15  
Old 10-18-2002, 10:31 PM
TANK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Fortunately, head replacement is much easier than a new bottom end. Most of these head problems occurred when excessive heat was introduced from the trap oxidizer (since removed) or from broken rad necks, etc.

This must explain a good part of it I would imagine. My car never even came with the trap oxidizer. They should have called it the head crakidizor/turbokiller instead. I wouldn't buy an sd over an aluminum head issue though. The sd doesn't seem to have much more interior room than an accord! It's all body! The sdl however, is a drastic difference and tons of room even by today's standards. SD's sure are great cars, don't get me wrong, but I looked at an 83' and it had minimal room inside. I was dis-appointed. Are all sd's created equal in this regard?? Why such a drastic difference anyway?

Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2018 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page