|
|
|
|
|
#16
02-20-2003, 10:21 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Rich,
Check your email... 
|
|
#17
02-20-2003, 11:09 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Dave, check e-mail
__________________
Rich 1990 300CE 71 Chevelle SS 454
|
|
#18
02-20-2003, 11:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
gsxr,
I have been asking same question on WaterWetter ... is there any independent analysis on this product? I don't contend it doesn't "work;" but, I do ask where is it on a marginal efficiency basis ... i.e. if it contributes 15% to the cooling capability (not likely) it is a great idea. If it contributes 1% it is on the margin ... i.e. if you are within 1% of overheating it would seem reasonable there are other problems (since most coolant systems are overdesigned). Anyone know of any independent data on WaterWetter?
__________________
George Stephenson 1991 350 SDL (200K and she ain't bent, yet) former 2002 E320 4Matic Wagon - good car former 1985 300 CD - great car former 1981 300 TD - good car former 1972 280 SEL - not so good car a couple of those diesel Rabbits ...40-45 mpg
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
