|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
As Seen On TV
Has anyone used the Tornado Fuel Saver? If so, does it really work?
The manufacturer's website: www.myauto.tv |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I am embarrassed to admit that I have one. A friend said he had one on his Suburban and it worked great and increased his mpg.
My Suburban gets 9 mpg so I was desparate to get anything that would improve it. The Tornado was installed and I still get 9 mpg and cannot notice any difference in performance. To conclude this response. Save your money. Just curious. What vehicle are you thinking about putting one on? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Air is not a limiting factor in a diesel engine as it is in a gas engine. A gas engine balances air that is throttled in with gas and then is ignited by spark. Conversely, a diesel engine’s air enters unthrottled and power is determined by the amount of fuel that 1) enters the combustion chamber and 2) combusts under pressure. Therefore, any product that increases airflow to a diesel is a waste of money.
__________________
1996 (W210) E300D 86K - Traded in for a Lexus 1992 (W124) 300D 2.5 Turbo 202K - Sold 1983 (W123) 300D, 146K - Sold 1970 280S, 263K - Sold - Beginning of addiction |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
This is a scam, just as any fuel magnets, exhaust "turbo" vanes, air swirlers, or throttle wedges.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I too think that that product is a waste of $$, but it can be beneficial to get more air into the cylinders. This includes a ram-air setup and a turbocharger. slowmoe's right that air by itself is useless, but if you get more air in there, you can use more fuel safely, and thus have more power. But, air by itself wo'nt do it. It's necessary to "turn up" the fuel as well, and if you start doing stuff like that, it's a really good idea to install a pyrometer, and then keep a religious eye on it while driving.
__________________
2001 VW Jetta TDI, 5 speed, daily driver 1991 Ford F-350, work in progress 1984 Ford F-250 4x4, 6.9l turbo diesel, 5 speed manual Previous oilburners: 1980 IH Scout, 1984 E-350, 1985 M-B 300D, 1979 M-B 300SD, 1983 M-B 300D Spark-free since 1999 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Warden,
I was just about to make the same comment about a turbocharger on Diesel engines. But you did it so well that I won't have to. P E H |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Just curious. What vehicle are you thinking about putting one on?
Into 97 Dodge Caravan with 3.3 6 cylinder engine, but now I won't.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
My euro "85' 240d had one in the air filter housing when bought the car. I took it out a while back an am willing to part with it at a very reasonable price. It worked so well that I felt guilty about getting such good fuel mileage I just couldn't stand it any longer. Nah, nothing changed when I took it out .
__________________
1985 Euro 240D 5 spd 140K 1979 240D 5 spd, 40K on engine rebuild 1994 Dodge/Cummins, 5 spd, 121K 1964 Allice Chalmers D15 tractor 2014 Kubota L3800 tractor 1964 VW bug "Lifes too short to drive a boring car" |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
I have used the "cyclone" which was the original marketed product in my previous carburetted cars where it was possible to place obtain a swirl effect just before the addition of fuel and hence enhance mixing. In those cars, I felt there was some benefit (Daihatsu Charade, w123 200).
I recently placed one in my w126, just within the air-filter housing. It made no difference. In this case, I think it is just too far away from the intake manifold to have any residual effect. The presence of the air-flow sensor also disrupts the cyclical swirl. Unless you can get it to fit into the intake manifold just before the injectors, I don't think it works (it definitely does not on my car). However, it is an interesting concept, and I understand it was hugely profitable considering the price vs what is essentially a nicely shaped tin-can. At least there seems to be some science in this, compared to the use of magnets to enhance fuel quality, for example.....
__________________
1983 w126 280SE - daily drive 1983 w123 200 - sold |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
scam
Don't you think if a $1 piece of tin would increase performance and gas milage all manufacturers would have this as an OEM piece?
My favorite scam is the $.01 sticker you put under the cell phone battery to increase reception "like you have a 4' long antenna!" Again, if it worked, the manufacturer would be doing it - right?
__________________
~shell As of 2/2010: 2001 CLK55 0o\=*=/o0 13.6 @ 106mph 10K mi 1984 300SD 260K mi and going and going... 97 S600 46K miles 1991 Sentra SE-R (extremely dorked with) www.se-r.net |
Bookmarks |
|
|