|
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
I don't get that type of response from people.. my car is bright metallic red. I used to have a retired state police cruiser, a '98, white.. that always got the looks.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Try this. This is Quicktime, and the 0-60 is from a stop, rounding a corner. Takes about 9 seconds to get there. Remember, I do not believe in brake-torqueing. (of course I didn't apply full pedal around the corner!)
Movie Quicktime It has sound, but no counter Also, listen to the tire squealing as I punch it!
__________________
1987 300SDL (324000) 1986 Porsche 951 (944 Turbo) (166000) 1978 Porsche 924 (99000) 1996 Nissan Pathfinder R50 (201000) Last edited by DslBnz; 09-29-2003 at 11:16 PM. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I'm sure its a keeper, if it looks as good as it sounds; both the engine, and the description!:p
__________________
1987 300SDL (324000) 1986 Porsche 951 (944 Turbo) (166000) 1978 Porsche 924 (99000) 1996 Nissan Pathfinder R50 (201000) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Wow.. that car runs like a bear. I see you have a newer steering wheel on it.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Here are photos of it the day I brought it home (you won't see it this clean ever again).
http://207.44.234.41/01p73/ |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Hahehe, you know I got many responses telling me I was soft to say my SDL could sprint quickly. So I had to take a video to prove it. There, dieselers, there is your new "Eduardo"! Its the turbolag that kills my car initially!
__________________
1987 300SDL (324000) 1986 Porsche 951 (944 Turbo) (166000) 1978 Porsche 924 (99000) 1996 Nissan Pathfinder R50 (201000) |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
1987 300SDL (324000) 1986 Porsche 951 (944 Turbo) (166000) 1978 Porsche 924 (99000) 1996 Nissan Pathfinder R50 (201000) Last edited by DslBnz; 09-30-2003 at 01:06 AM. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
After this post, I've got to get to bed. I can't respond anymore until tomorrow afternoon.
__________________
1987 300SDL (324000) 1986 Porsche 951 (944 Turbo) (166000) 1978 Porsche 924 (99000) 1996 Nissan Pathfinder R50 (201000) |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
dslbnz-
Neat video. That SDL can move, especially from 30-50. I notice we have similar taste in Mercedes. I have always wondered how the 300SE stacks up against the om603 126's. How do yours stack up? I once asked Sixto this and he said he thought the SDL was faster than his 300SE. I've been keeping my eye open for a diesel. Your thoughts? Mike
__________________
'90 300SE 298k -300K and it gets put into retirement. '80 300D 255k Purchased new by family in 1980. Had a: 1973 220 (gas) 1980 300SD 1992 400E |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
DslBnz
Do you have a light burned out? Look like that idiot lite is illuminated.
__________________
BENZ THERE DONE THAThttp://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/...c/progress.gif 15 VW Passat TDI 00 E420 98 E300 DT 97 E420 Donor Car - NEED PARTS? PM ME! 97 S500 97 E300D 86 Holden Jackaroo Turbo D 86 300SDL (o\|/o) |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: DslBnz
Quote:
I posted the E420 too, and that is a 275 bhp 295 lb/ft of torque V8 gasser. 90% of peak torque is available practically off idle. The SDL keeps pace with the 420 30 - 55 mph (run the two videos side by side to know what I mean). That is EXTREMELY impressive for anyone who knows the M119. As for the SE, well, the average SE couldn't keep up. This run was done, for both cars, without brake torqueing. You ever notice how most SE's are dead off the line? Even in first they have trouble shifting the weight. Don't even get me started on some 300SEL's. You'd feel like your old '81 SD was quicker off the line (longer wheelbase, less seat in the pants feel)! Some M103's are unusually quick, though. Just as unusual as my SDL. Sixto says he believes his gets to 60 around 14 secs. Plantman's (formerly turbodiesel's) gets there in 12. Its really the turbolag that kills these cars. If you were to braketorque these cars, it would be much better. Mine was not floored until after I got out of the corner. You can hear the tires chirping as I hit the gas, and as it shifts from 1st to 2nd. For example, Plantman's SDL goes 80-90 mph in the same amount of time as turbodiesel's Crown Vic! Thanks for your comments.
__________________
1987 300SDL (324000) 1986 Porsche 951 (944 Turbo) (166000) 1978 Porsche 924 (99000) 1996 Nissan Pathfinder R50 (201000) Last edited by DslBnz; 09-30-2003 at 09:06 AM. |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
as for the 400E - what a rocket. Underrated car performance wise. Around here all of the attention goes to the 500E guys. Needs way more tire though. Mike
__________________
'90 300SE 298k -300K and it gets put into retirement. '80 300D 255k Purchased new by family in 1980. Had a: 1973 220 (gas) 1980 300SD 1992 400E |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
Wow that is one fast 300SDL!
I have to agree on the M119's voice though! It sounds glorious on full throttle. Not the exhaust.. but the motor.. wow.. still can't get over it. Sounds like a proper V8 but more refined than Mustangs. hhmm wonder what a W124 300D Turbo could do with a 'healthy' OM603 motor.. or a W124 with the OM606 Turbodiesel motor
__________________
2008 BMW 335i Coupe |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The 400E. Boy I loved that car. This was the car that introduced me to the M119. As we were merging onto a highway in one at 40 mph, my dad floored it. I couldn't believe how fast it picked up speed! it finally changed gears at 82 mph, and sped past 100 mph like nothing. My father, at the time, drove a manual 300E. When he would be doing about 75 - 80 in the 300E, he felt he would've been going 100 mph + in the 400! The power was constantly rushing and pressing you back against the seat.
__________________
1987 300SDL (324000) 1986 Porsche 951 (944 Turbo) (166000) 1978 Porsche 924 (99000) 1996 Nissan Pathfinder R50 (201000) |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Again, about the voice of the M119. It actually doesn't sound much different than the M117. That's why I like it so much!:p
__________________
1987 300SDL (324000) 1986 Porsche 951 (944 Turbo) (166000) 1978 Porsche 924 (99000) 1996 Nissan Pathfinder R50 (201000) |
Bookmarks |
|
|