|
|
|
#46
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
#dieselFLEET --------------- '97 E300 '99 E300 |
#47
|
||||
|
||||
so what
has it done to your fuel economy?
tom w
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC] ..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis. |
#48
|
||||
|
||||
Mpg
What kind of MPG figures are you getting. Have you calculated the numbers?
__________________
2003 SLK 230 (85000) 1999 E300 Turbo Diesel (388,000) 1991 350SD Turbo Diesel (185,000) |
#49
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
If that is the case, some independent data would be nice |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
I have just had my 99 chipped and also report a great increase in horsepower and torque. But one thing I noticed driving out of Oliver's was a slight resting the foot on the pedal miss/hesitation. Also when slowing down and then resting my foot on the pedal produces the same thing.
Has anyone else experienced this with the chip? Oliver said it will take some time to break in. The computer must learn he says. I have close to 300 miles and I still have the symptom. 0-60mph in 7.72 secs with the G-tech pro with no power braking does not have me complaining too much though.
__________________
-disav 99 E300 TURBODIESEL Astral Silver 282K - AMG brakes, suspension, monoblocks, speedo & interior - Full Load Maxed on IP by custom Speed Tuning USA Chip - T3/T4 Garrett - EGR/MAF delete 98 E300 TURBODIESEL Alexandrite Green on black leather 289K 95 E300 DIESEL Green Queen 267K SOLD 84 300D 216k SOLD 87 300D 299K #22 head - intercooler - full load adj. - 8sec 0-60mph - SOLD 76 300D 214K SOLD |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Ok, call me crazy, but does anyone offer a high-economy engine chip? I love a fast diesel as much as the next person, but if I could get up to 40-45mpg with a small loss of power, I personally would be interested in that.
I've driven a stock 98 E300 before and it just flies compared to my 92 300D 2.5 Turbo. If I upgraded to a 98 or 99 and put in the high-economy chip, I'd still have a noticible power increase from my 93, thus I wouldn't be "missing" anything, so to speak. Thoughts? -m
__________________
Now: 2018 Tesla Model X 1999 S500 Grand Edition 164k 1992 300D 2.5 Turbo 287k 2005 E320 4MATIC wagon 1991 Alfa Romeo 164L 99k (sleeping for a while) Then: 96 Lincoln TC, 93 Lincoln TC, 87 560 SEL, 87 300 SDL, 80 300D, 89 560 SEC |
#53
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
#dieselFLEET --------------- '97 E300 '99 E300 |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Why do you say that? Don't have to be about power all the time, power is easy. Economy is more difficult.
-m
__________________
Now: 2018 Tesla Model X 1999 S500 Grand Edition 164k 1992 300D 2.5 Turbo 287k 2005 E320 4MATIC wagon 1991 Alfa Romeo 164L 99k (sleeping for a while) Then: 96 Lincoln TC, 93 Lincoln TC, 87 560 SEL, 87 300 SDL, 80 300D, 89 560 SEC |
#55
|
||||
|
||||
Probably not. If you make it economical and 5 users buy it but you make power and 100 users buy it, where do you think they will stick their time and money into?
__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke 99 E300 Turbodiesel 91 Vette with 383 motor 05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI 06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI 03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red 03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow 04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler 11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
BTW I believe most of the fuel consuption (when the mpg figures are low) comes from acceleration...
...in making my 300SD more powerful by adding fuel, I have actaully INCREASED my mpg numbers for mixed driving. Around town they drop a little due to the extra accel fuel but if you are working a good mix, then the extra power actaully helps you get up to speed faster and take your foot out of it. Some of the guys that have chipped their stuff might chime in here but I imagine they aren't seeing serious MPG losses....any increases? I know its hard to drive the same way with more power....its like "hey now I can do 85 in this amount of time rather than 70...woo!" hehe |
#57
|
||||
|
||||
If I took it easy, I get maybe half to a mile more per gallon.
__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke 99 E300 Turbodiesel 91 Vette with 383 motor 05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI 06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI 03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red 03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow 04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler 11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
You guys ever try RocketChip? http://www.Rocketchip.com
He does great work for the TDI's. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Don't know about MBs, because I don't think there's a chip available for my '91 300D.
But I can confidently report that my chipped TDI offers between 5 percent and 10 percent better fuel economy. With the Rocketchip II, which is designed for a larger nozzle mod that I haven't performed, my economy increased from 2 to 5 mpgs, or between 46 and 48 mpg in horrendous L.A. traffic. Power increased by 25 hp and 50 ft. lbs. torque, which puts me at about 115 hp, slightly less than the 2.5T, but with far more grunt. That said, I keep me foot out of it except for an occasional romp to exercise the turbo vanes or to zip through traffic. The ONLY downside has been a puff of smoke at WOT -- and a new clutch. My TDI has 110K, and I chipped it 10K ago, so I've run many tanks of fuel through her.
__________________
'91 300D 2.5 Turbo 330K '00 VW TDI Golf, 190K '67 BMW R50/2 '73 Norton Commando Interstate |
#60
|
||||
|
||||
Chip
Yes My 1999 TDI Was chipped by Oliver at SpeedTuning with similar results.
With some additional Modifications I got as much as 53 MPG with no loss of power. I would like to chip my 1999 E300TD as well. I have no doubt it will increase power but im looking for fuel ecomomy. I average 33-35 MPG with this vehicle. Last edited by Anthony Cerami; 02-05-2006 at 04:19 PM. |
Bookmarks |
|
|