Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-05-2004, 01:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 463
K&N air filter on MB diesels

yo,

i just put in a K&N air filter on my 1991 300D 2.5 turbo. when i did i really didnt think i would see a difference, but was i wrong.
i had a huge improvment in highway milage (@80 mph):

28 mpg (before)
33.4 mpg (after)

nothing else on the car has changed, but i am thinking that the old air filter may have been overdue for changing, but it didnt seem that dirty. the car isnt any faster, but i definately wasnt expecting that!

was wondering if anyone else has put one of these in their diesel and what kind of results they got.

__________________
1991 300 D 2.5 Turbo, 220k
also in the family:
1981 240 D 185k
1991 350 SD 185k
2006 S 500
2005 SLK 350
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-05-2004, 08:53 PM
coachgeo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southern OH
Posts: 1,800
be aware

K&N filters are designed to be DIRTY. They filter very poorly when first shot with the oil. After they get dirty they filter as they are designed too. This may also reduce your milage back to normal too but Im not for sure.

did you put in K&N filter kit (new filter and housing) or a K&N OEM shape filter in the OEM air cleaner box?
__________________
"If anyone knows other lessons I need to learn, please tell me. I'm tired of learning them the hard way".
by JerryBro


The Glow Plug Wait: This waiting period is a moment of silence to pay honor to Rudolph Diesel. The longer you own your diesel the more honor you will give him". by SD Blue

My normal daily life; either SNAFUed- Situation Normal... All Fouled Up, or FUBARed- Fouled Up Beyond All Repair

62 UNIMOG Camper w/617 Turbo, 85 300SD daily driver- both powered by blended UCO fuels
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-05-2004, 08:56 PM
vwbuge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Johnstown, Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,116
I just converted my CA car to federal spec and was considering not using the federal air cleaner setup. Was your car any louder?
__________________
'85 300SD (formerly california emissions)
'08 Chevy Tahoe
'93 Ducati 900 SS
'79 Kawasaki KZ 650
'86 Kawasaki KX 250
'88 Kawasaki KDX200
'71 Hodaka Ace 100
'72 Triumph T100R
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-05-2004, 10:25 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Wakefield, RI
Posts: 2,145
K&N's supposedly don't filter all that well, they let a lot of dirt get by, or so I've heard. Then again they are used successfully on many applications and I have used them in the past. I SOAK them with oil, so that they drip excess most of the time. I figure better safe than sorry? There is another filter company Uni that I also like. Oiled foam seems like it would do a better job than a layer of cotton. Dunno if they make a MB filter. RT
__________________
When all else fails, vote from the rooftops!
84' Mercedes Benz 300D Anthracite/black, 171K
03' Volkswagen Jetta TDI blue/black, 93K
93' Chevrolet C2500HD ExCab 6.5TD, Two-tone blue, 252K
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-05-2004, 11:12 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 18,350
I put a K&N on my 409d with the 617 engine since the original air filter housing was damaged in a collision. The K&N was VERY loud until I put a bleach bottle over it. Now it is a lot quieter.
__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-05-2004, 11:29 PM
coachgeo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southern OH
Posts: 1,800
Quote:
Originally posted by rwthomas1
K&N's supposedly don't filter all that well,..... RT
RW my .02 on K&N's is comming from huge amounts of talk on the subject in the 4x4 world. The talk of K&N filters not being great started with some poorly done studies. They tested the K&N BEFORE it was dirty. It is designed to be dirty and wont perform up to its potential till it is.
__________________
"If anyone knows other lessons I need to learn, please tell me. I'm tired of learning them the hard way".
by JerryBro


The Glow Plug Wait: This waiting period is a moment of silence to pay honor to Rudolph Diesel. The longer you own your diesel the more honor you will give him". by SD Blue

My normal daily life; either SNAFUed- Situation Normal... All Fouled Up, or FUBARed- Fouled Up Beyond All Repair

62 UNIMOG Camper w/617 Turbo, 85 300SD daily driver- both powered by blended UCO fuels
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-06-2004, 10:58 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 463
OEM replacement filter
no, its not any louder
__________________
1991 300 D 2.5 Turbo, 220k
also in the family:
1981 240 D 185k
1991 350 SD 185k
2006 S 500
2005 SLK 350
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-06-2004, 01:25 PM
190D22's Avatar
Driver's Side lights
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 876
I actually took my K&N out today. Looking at it I could see VISIBLE holes in the filter element, which DUH allows LOTS of dirt through. I feel a lot safer with that paper element!!

It does make the car louder out of the air intake, by quite a bit actually. It makes it resonate a lot more.

Theres a spot on the K&N that is dirty and then a spot that's not. Which doesn't make sense to me... but the damn thing didn't give me any performance difference at all (well I guess I will see when I drive it today with the paper filter) but my mileage didn't change any either. I just dont want to start burning oil sooner than I have to!
__________________
1984 190D 2.2 Auto 220k
2001 Jeep Cherokee Sport 70K
2004 Lexus RX-330 ??K
2005 Chrylser Crossfire LTD 6K

Play guitar? Go to www.cyberfret.com for free online lessons!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-06-2004, 03:11 PM
wolf_walker's Avatar
Zen And The Art Of Diesel
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 2,050
I've seen way, way, way, way too many absolutly filthy throttle body's and intake tracts from people that have been running K&N filters.

Maybe it's because there not dirty enough, maybe people don't clean or oil them right, I don't know, but I do know if it's that easy to screw up and get the kind of **** I've wiped up out of throttle bodys with my finger, pure GRIT, I don't want one.

My humble opinion..

__________________
One more Radar Lover gone...
1982 VW Caddy diesel 406K 1.9L AAZ
1994 E320 195K
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-06-2004, 05:48 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Manhattan, KS
Posts: 596
The subject of oiled-foam airfilters vs paper filters has been under debate over at dieselplace.com for a while now. There is a guy who has set up a relatively scientific test apparatus to test the various filters. The link below is to a topic with about 10 pages of the debate and test setup.

http://dieselplace.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5657&PN=2

__________________
Keep everything as simple as possible-but no simpler--Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page