Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-18-2004, 04:29 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 14
Is a 190D as slow as a 240D?

As one can see by my member name, I'd like a 300D. However, I sometimes get tempted by some 240D's that I run across. I drove a W123-style 240D recently and found it to be very underpowered (even without the AC). So I figured that I don't want the 4cyl 240D; I should get the 5cyl 300D.
But THEN!, I also like the newer-style 190D - the 1984 thru 1988 190D with 2.2 liter 4cyl. I haven't had the opportunity to drive one yet.

SO, here's my question to those who may know...

For example: Is an 84 190D as slow and under-powered as an 83 240D?

Attached Thumbnails
Is a 190D as slow as a 240D?-190d_vs_240d.jpg  

Last edited by 300D-wanted-GA; 06-18-2004 at 04:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-18-2004, 05:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: California
Posts: 2,068
They are faster, smoother, quieter and are worlds ahead in terms of handling.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-18-2004, 05:04 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 271
I can't imagine any '80's vehicle slower than a 240d; except maybe a moped going uphill against a headwind with a chubby friend in back. But seriously folks, I'd wager their 0-60 specs wouldn't be close by half. Those that have driven both will chime in I hope.
__________________
1981 240d
Newport,RI
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-18-2004, 05:09 PM
2.5 TURBO
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Send me back to Atlanta
Posts: 876
go for the 300D 2.5 turbo

33MPG and good power, more than the W123 I had
__________________
2000 Ford 7.3 Powerstroke 4x4
2006 Mazda Tribute
1983 Black 300 D (donated to charity)
1993 Teal 300 D (160K) Sold
"I love the smell of burnt diesel fuel in the morning, it smells like ....VICTORY"

Semper Fidelis
USMC 1973-1976
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-18-2004, 05:13 PM
Life is too short!
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 26
RE: 85 190D

If there was ever a Rocket that was the little 85 190D I had. It got 48 MPG too. Too bad I let a neighbor have it for $3500. I loved that little 190.
__________________
Visit my web site and see what it is like living in a Historic town:www.oldsalemhomes.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-18-2004, 06:56 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
There's a turbo and non-turbo 190D. I haven't driven either one, but I'd guess the non-turbo isn't much faster than a 240D, though it probably is a bit faster because it's lighter. You want a fast diesel? Get an 87 300D.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-18-2004, 07:00 PM
Holson Adi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 2,561
or an 87 190D 2.5 Turbo
__________________
2008 BMW 335i Coupe
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-18-2004, 08:12 PM
Life is too short!
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 26
Re: 87 300 D Turbo

I have one and it only has 80k miles on it. I bought it new.
__________________
Visit my web site and see what it is like living in a Historic town:www.oldsalemhomes.com
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-18-2004, 09:20 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,220
The 240D weighs about 3250 curb weight with 67 bhp 97 lb/ft of torque and a 3.69 differential.

The 190D 2.2 weighs 2700 lbs with 72 bhp 96 ft/lbs and a 3.42 differential.

On paper, it certainly looks like the 190D would be faster, quicker, and more economical.
__________________
1987 300SDL (324000)

1986 Porsche 951 (944 Turbo) (166000)

1978 Porsche 924 (99000)

1996 Nissan Pathfinder R50 (201000)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-18-2004, 09:33 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 14
Now that's what i'm talkin' about - - A guy who knows his numbers! Thanks DslBnz!

And as punky stated: hopefully "those that have driven both will chime in."
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-18-2004, 10:20 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 54
Well mine is much slower than my SL

The 190D is not bad. A little slow off the line, but 20 and up and she goes nicely. Love the mileage too! Now with the A/C on it is a real dog from a dead start, but then revs fine.
__________________
'86 190E 2.3-16V 160K
'89 190D 209K For Sale
'95 SL320 86K Sold
'95 LandRover Disco 130K Sold
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-18-2004, 10:25 PM
Life is too short!
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 26
My two cents worth....

Owned 1976 240 D My first, but very slow to get up to speed.
1985 190 D Turbo, Fantastic little HOTROD 48 MPG
1987 300 D Turbo, Super driver, no Slow poke, Reliable.
Makes a fellow want to get a cup of that diesel smoke and set it on the nightstand when you go to bed at night. LOL!
__________________
Visit my web site and see what it is like living in a Historic town:www.oldsalemhomes.com
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-21-2004, 02:23 PM
MB_FanAddict's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 222
tech specs

1984-1985 190D 2.2
5-speed manual 0-100km/h (0-62.1 mph) 18.4 sec top speed 97 mph
4-speed automatic 0-100km/h (0-62.1 mph) 19.1 sec top speed 94 mph

1980-1983 240D
4-speed manual 0-100km/h (0-62.1 mph) 22 sec top speed 89 mph
4-speed automatic 0-100km/h (0-62.1 mph) 24.7 sec top speed 86 mph
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-21-2004, 04:12 PM
VeeDubTDI
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally posted by Holson Adi
or an 87 190D 2.5 Turbo
FAST! I loved that little car. Good luck finding one though.

The turbo model is 123 hp and 168 lb-ft of torque.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-21-2004, 07:32 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 41
I really don't get all the concern about the "slowness" of a 240D. My '82 automatic trans accelerates from stop lights equally with other traffic, and often ahead of it. On the freeway, it climbs to 70-75 with adequate speed. This car is a classic, and I would prefer it to the design of the 190.

__________________
DHB
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page