Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion > Diesel Performance Tuning

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 06-17-2008, 08:45 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 710
Quote:
Originally Posted by ConnClark View Post
On an SD a cherry bomb muffler helps a little. I have also replaced my turbo with one from an OM603 engine (not exactly a drop in replacement) which is of newer design and all indications are that this too is an improvement in mileage and power.
Any reduction in backpressure should help fuel economy AND power a little.

How does it sound with the cherry bomb? I am looking to make mine sound more powerfull but not loud when I eventually replace my exhaust.

__________________
Ron Schroeder
'85 300 Turbo Diesel 2 tank WVO
'83 300 Turbo Diesel 2 tank WVO
Some former WVO vehicles since ~1980:
'83 Mercedes 240D
'80 Audi 4000D
'83 ISUZU Pup
'70 SAAB 99 with Kubota diesel
'76 Honda Civic with Kubota diesel
'86 Golf
Several diesel generators
All with 2 tank WVO conversion
LI NY
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-17-2008, 11:21 AM
bgkast's Avatar
Rollin' on 16s
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Vancouver WA
Posts: 6,528
I seem to have gained a bit over 2 MPG with my VGT. I believe this is due to lower turbine inlet (back) pressure when cruising.
__________________
1979 240D- 316K miles - VGT Turbo, Intercooler, Stick Shift, Many Other Mods - Daily Driver

1982 300SD - 232K miles - Wife's Daily Driver

1986 560SL - Wife's red speed machine
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-17-2008, 11:34 AM
babymog's Avatar
Loose Cannon - No Balls
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Northeast Indiana
Posts: 10,765
THAT's worth the mod. Nice benefit.
__________________

Gone to the dark side

- Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-17-2008, 01:28 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by bgkast View Post
I believe this is due to lower turbine inlet (back) pressure when cruising.
Right. I can basically turn my turbo off when cruising, it makes only 0-2psi of boost and has little more restriction than a non-turbo engine.

Quote:
What changes that anyone has done has kept at least the base performance on a 617 turbo but has made a noticeable improvement in fuel mileage.
I'm making 20hp, 46lb-ft more than stock (dyno verified) and still average 26mpg in mixed city+highway driving and 29mpg on highway trips.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-17-2008, 02:31 PM
Tymbrymi's Avatar
Klatta Klatta
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Olive Branch, MS
Posts: 616
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForcedInduction View Post
...29mpg on highway trips.
How fast do you drive?
__________________
John Robbins
'05 E320 CDI - 240k
'87 300TD - 318k
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 06-17-2008, 03:07 PM
bgkast's Avatar
Rollin' on 16s
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Vancouver WA
Posts: 6,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForcedInduction View Post
Right. I can basically turn my turbo off when cruising, it makes only 0-2psi of boost and has little more restriction than a non-turbo engine.
I am at 5-6 psi when crusing on the freeway. I could probably get a bit more economy by further opening the vanes at cruise, but for now I will stick with my simple actuator system. I just got 27.5 MPG on a highway trip at 65 MPH, up from 25 or so. I also still have the 3.69 rear end.
__________________
1979 240D- 316K miles - VGT Turbo, Intercooler, Stick Shift, Many Other Mods - Daily Driver

1982 300SD - 232K miles - Wife's Daily Driver

1986 560SL - Wife's red speed machine
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-17-2008, 11:50 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tymbrymi View Post
How fast do you drive?
70mph. I know for sure I can break 30mpg if I can keep it under 60mph.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-07-2008, 05:19 PM
Crappy Gas Pipe's Avatar
Grease Monkey
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: East Northport NY
Posts: 93
Covert to run on waste veg oil. 80-113 MPG if you drive 50 miles to work. (summer or longer distances will improve MPG)
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-07-2008, 10:48 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by crappy gas pipe View Post
covert to run on waste veg oil. 80-113 mpg if you drive 50 miles to work. (summer or longer distances will improve mpg)
False, waste fryer crap will reduce base performance as well as the lifespan and long term performance.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-08-2008, 11:48 AM
Simpler=Better's Avatar
Ham Shanker
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,544
I think he means MPGD as in miles per gallon diesel(warmup/shutdown cycles; not counting the "free" wvo
__________________
$60 OM617 Blank Exhaust Flanges
$110 OM606 Blank Exhaust Flanges
No merc at the moment
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-08-2008, 12:14 PM
ConnClark's Avatar
Power User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,123
Quote:
Originally Posted by WD8CDH View Post
Any reduction in backpressure should help fuel economy AND power a little.

How does it sound with the cherry bomb? I am looking to make mine sound more powerfull but not loud when I eventually replace my exhaust.
Mine is fairly quiet still as I kept the resonator. It is not much louder than stock. Most noise comes from the engine compartment. I do have an 85 Cali car that has an Ox cat and that also contributes to muffling the noise however.
__________________
green 85 300SD 200K miles "Das Schlepper Frog" With a OM603 TBO360 turbo ( To be intercooled someday )( Kalifornistani emissons )
white 79 300SD 200K'ish miles "Farfegnugen" (RIP - cracked crank)
desert storm primer 63 T-bird "The Undead" (long term hibernation)

http://ecomodder.com/forum/fe-graphs/sig692a.png
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-08-2008, 09:17 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simpler=Better View Post
I think he means MPGD as in miles per gallon diesel(warmup/shutdown cycles; not counting the "free" wvo
The same way this guy claims his 400hp mustang gets 100MPG because it burns E85.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-09-2008, 08:38 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: D.C.
Posts: 487
He would be getting 100mi/gal of paid fuel if he was distilling his own E100 and blending. However, the difference is he is paying for 100% of the fuel he burns, not 15%.
__________________
99 E300 Turbodiesel 100k
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-09-2008, 08:55 AM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
No, the difference is he actually gets 16.5mpg.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-11-2008, 09:27 AM
Simpler=Better's Avatar
Ham Shanker
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,544
Not bad, my mustang(before the engine seized) was getting 12-15mpg

__________________
$60 OM617 Blank Exhaust Flanges
$110 OM606 Blank Exhaust Flanges
No merc at the moment
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page