Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion > Diesel Performance Tuning

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 08-04-2008, 02:51 AM
Registered Hack
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,642
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForcedInduction View Post
A turbo or supercharger does not add any power to the engine.
right, it adds EFFICIENCY (turbo only)

Quote:
Thats why a turbo added to a 240D or non-turbo 300D with an otherwise unmodified engine does not add any power. Its only after the injection pump settings are changed that it can get a change in output. The same applies with making the turbo produce more boost than the engine receives fuel for, it adds restriction and actually reduces power.
Its hard to imagine that even with the valve totally open, and no energy being spent on creating boost, that your turbo isn't also restrictive. I see no straight sections as wide as the exhaust pipe.

With the turbo creating even a little boost (or just enough), it is providing enough extra efficiency to negate its comprimising effects on the engine. (-a belief)

I do not mean to be antagonizing and I apologize if you have already gone the hoops of trial and error finding the exact spot where efficiency and fuel consumption meet. Would this would mean that the exhaust being passed through the turbo is small enough to get by w/o backpressure, and that the corresponding fuel usage is just enough to keep you coasting?

__________________

Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 08-04-2008, 02:56 AM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by jt20 View Post
right, it adds EFFICIENCY (turbo only)
Incorrect. A turbo only adds power.
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 08-04-2008, 03:14 AM
Registered Hack
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,642
damn.

Any suggestions for where I can read up on turbos?

--on a NIN kick, huh?--
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 08-04-2008, 03:20 AM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarrett/tech_center/turbo_tech101.html
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 08-04-2008, 03:22 AM
Registered Hack
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,642
been there
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 08-04-2008, 03:47 AM
Cervan's Avatar
Crazy mechanic.
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: olympia washington
Posts: 1,809
Turbo adds air to be burnt, thus power. it takes away less power at the crankshaft than a supercharger (supposibly a supercharger leeches 1/3 the power at the crankshaft).
__________________
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac?

As long as they would add one additional commandment for you to keep thy religion to thyself.
George Carlin (Wonder where he is now..)

1981 240d (engine donor 1983 240d) recently rebuilt engine hurray! - No more.. fought a tree and the tree won.

pearl black 1983 240d 4speed (Converted!@$$%) atleast the tranny was rebuilt.
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 08-12-2008, 01:00 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeremy5848 View Post
Although I have yet to complete the work, removal of the trap cat from 617.952 engines (California version of the '85 300D and SD cars) has been claimed on this forum as well as documented in M-B specs to improve both power and fuel economy.

A couple of horsepower and a couple of mpg are said to result from replacing the cat with a straight pipe for testing purposes only. I plan a long test, say 200,000 miles, to get good data.

Jeremy


can i see some picture please, where to find trap cat place and what its lookof this. and one thing more how to remove it. hope that you could me out. thanks a lot sir
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 08-12-2008, 05:03 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
http://www.peachparts.com/Wikka/OM617CalToFed
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 01-20-2010, 01:17 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1
the truth about forced induction

The way I like to explain any forced induction is based on the fact that an engine is an air pump. Plain and simple, an engine will move a certain volume of air from sucking in the intake and pumping it out the exhaust for a given rotation. The typical 4 cycle will require 2 revolutions to use all of the cylinders making the number equal to the displacement capacity of the engine. When we supercharge or turbocharge we actually make the engine appear to have greater displacement. This larger capacity means the engine pumps more air and thus can burn more fuel. This artificial capacity increase is based entirely on the amount of boost pressure present at the intake manifold. A couple of neat things are made capable from this. One is that we can take a small, lightweight engine which can rev fast due to low reciprocating mass and increase the torque and HP ouput significantly. This also leads to a general fuel saving because we are using a small displacement engine all the time, and depending on the boost to increase the horspower when it's needed for short period of time. Understand that in a gasoline engine, we use the throttle to restrict the intake and do the exact opposite, making the cylinders less full of air and thus less fuel for a reduction in displacement per revolution.

Some of the other comments are true: Any artificial induction has losses all the time and will increase fuel consumption across the board on a given engine (even when not producing boost). The only systems that severly limit this loss are like the Mercedes SLK supercharger with a clutch and a series of valves/airchambers to bypass the entire system when in a non-boost condition. Even then, friction and aerodynamic losses have some slight increase in fuel consumption (measureable but not significant).
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 01-20-2010, 01:30 PM
Registered Hack
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,642
simply put:

Increasing the power to weight ratio improves vehicle efficiency.

thank you for concluding this thread, Barrychuck.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #101  
Old 01-21-2010, 07:54 AM
Eric's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by jt20 View Post
Increasing the power to weight ratio improves vehicle efficiency.
a turbo only does this during acceleration. at constant speed it will always have pumping and heat losses.
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 02-23-2010, 01:28 AM
Red Pike's Avatar
Marine Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: White Plains, NY
Posts: 86
Okay, guys. A turbo or supercharger increases the air intake pressure, increasing the air density, which means more oxygen molecules pumped into the cylinder to combine with fuel in the combustion process. A charge air cooler, commonly called an intercooler in automotive circles, increases the density of the air entering the cylinder by lowering its temperature (the old pressure:volume:temperature relationship), also increasing the number of oxygen molecules entering the cylinder. The increased oxygen present means more fuel can be added. Burning (completely) more fuel per stroke results in more power per stroke, and increases the overall power and torque output of the engine. Because more power is produced per stroke, fewer strokes per minute (or rpm) are required for the same power output...resulting in increased fuel efficiency, whether accelerating or operating at a constant speed, for the same power produced. This is why most marine diesel engines (which frequently operate at relatively constant speed for extended periods) have turbos on them, as do most diesel generators used on ships...when your fuel bill is several million dollars per year, per ship, you want to maximize your efficiency.

__________________
Mahalo and Aloha,
S. L. "Red" Pike, Naval Architect/Marine Engineer, USCG Licensed Chief Engineer (Steam, Motor, and Gas Turbine)
Former nuc bubblehead (boomers)
"Sustained superior performance through continuous incremental improvement."

1987 300SDL White w/ Gray Leather interior, 160K (mine)
2009 Nissan Murano (leased - wife's)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page