Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion > Diesel Performance Tuning

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 01-20-2009, 09:26 AM
winmutt's Avatar
85 300D 4spd+tow+h4
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Atl Gawga
Posts: 9,346
I had an out the back muffler on my wifes wagon, dealer replacement even. Back was always sooty and my wife and I argued for atleast a year about if it was smokey inside or not. Never knew why until we got second wagon.

__________________
http://superturbodiesel.com/images/sig.04.10.jpg
1995 E420 Schwarz
1995 E300 Weiss
#1987 300D Sturmmachine
#1991 300D Nearly Perfect
#1994 E320 Cabriolet
#1995 E320 Touring
#1985 300D Sedan
OBK #42
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 01-20-2009, 02:26 PM
diesel123dan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 87
The middle muffler is the restrictive one. I've done several exhausts on 124's and 123's where I removed the diesel cat, muffler, and left the back muffler. Interior noises remain about the same, but it's louder outside. And there definately is a faster spool.

However, when I did a turbo on mine, I made my own downpipe and did a 3" straight. Not loud at all inside, and sounds like a baby cummins.




Don't even bother with a cherry bomb. I had one, it was raspy as hell. It resonated more than a straight that dumped in front of the rear tire.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 01-20-2009, 08:31 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,381
I'll watch the back- if it gets sooty, it gets changed. If I hear of more people that agree the resonator is restrictive, maybe I'll remove that also. I need more than one person who says the resonator removal is warranted.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 01-20-2009, 09:23 PM
rcounts's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kent, WA
Posts: 1,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTUpower View Post
...If I hear of more people that agree the resonator is restrictive, maybe I'll remove that also. I need more than one person who says the resonator removal is warranted.
Ditto that on the cherry-bomb. I've heard others say they hate the sound and wouldn't put one on a tractor - but I like their sound...
__________________
1984 300 Coupe TurboDiesel
Silver blue paint over navy blue interior
2nd owner & 2nd engine in an otherwise
99% original unmolested car
~210k miles on the clock

1986 Ford F250 4x4 Supercab
Charcoal & blue two tone paint over burgundy interior
Banks turbo, DRW, ZF-5 & SMF conversion
152k on the clock - actual mileage unknown
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 01-21-2009, 01:18 AM
ConnClark's Avatar
Power User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,123
I find some of this discussion amusing seeing that I have been down this road before. Unless everything I have read on exhaust theory is wrong the resonator adds very little back pressure. A big empty can is less restrictive to flow than an a container with baffels. I know that the w126 muffler is more a little more restrictive and muffles more than the w123's because it was the luxury car. I have no Idea about how a w124 stacks up in comparison.

About 3 people I know that have removed the resonator have spent good money putting it back in. They just got sick of the low drone at certain speeds, and not one has complained about any perceived loss of power.

As far as glass packs go, I have added a cherrybomb. When new it did muffle the volume of the exhaust quite a bit. I know this because when messing around trying to get the exhaust tip positioned right I pulled it off with the car running because I didn't have the clamps tightened. Even now packed with soot, it still quites the exhaust down quite a bit. I know because I checked it after I lost my tip last year when I backed into a snow bank. As far as the cherry bomb making my car sound raspy??? never!!! This is partially due to the fact I still have my resonator but it is also due to the fact I have a muzzled cali car
__________________
green 85 300SD 200K miles "Das Schlepper Frog" With a OM603 TBO360 turbo ( To be intercooled someday )( Kalifornistani emissons )
white 79 300SD 200K'ish miles "Farfegnugen" (RIP - cracked crank)
desert storm primer 63 T-bird "The Undead" (long term hibernation)

http://ecomodder.com/forum/fe-graphs/sig692a.png
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 01-21-2009, 01:51 AM
rcounts's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kent, WA
Posts: 1,189
Well, part of my deal is I want to unbolt the exhaust at the rear downpipe flange and set the entire stock piece aside untouched. Then install the straight pipe (with a new flange) from the downpipe back with the Cherry Bomb.

VERY quick & inexpensive exhaust mod, and if I don't like it I can go back to stock easily and quickly.
__________________
1984 300 Coupe TurboDiesel
Silver blue paint over navy blue interior
2nd owner & 2nd engine in an otherwise
99% original unmolested car
~210k miles on the clock

1986 Ford F250 4x4 Supercab
Charcoal & blue two tone paint over burgundy interior
Banks turbo, DRW, ZF-5 & SMF conversion
152k on the clock - actual mileage unknown
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 01-24-2009, 02:08 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,381
One week plus and the tailgate is not sooty at all, and I very much prefer the sound/performance of the muffler-less wagon.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 01-26-2009, 12:52 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by diesel123dan View Post
However, when I did a turbo on mine, I made my own downpipe and did a 3" straight. Not loud at all inside, and sounds like a baby cummins.
Did you have any clearance issues? I recently replaced the flex pipe on my W123 Frankenbenz (3.0L turbodiesel in a MT 240D, other mods as well....) and I was worried about the gap between the starter and chassis. I figure the 2.5" ID flex pipe probably is close in OD to 3" pipe. Also, why no flex pipe on your system?

(I ran sans exhaust from the downpipe back for a while, and the loss in power when I reinstalled the factory exhaust was very notiable and depressing... so I'm thinking of doing a 3" for myself in the near future)
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 01-26-2009, 10:10 AM
oldsinner111's Avatar
lied to for years
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Elizabethton, TN
Posts: 6,249
I'm going to go with either a turbo,or glass pack.Getting tired of making noise,I'm not going to put stock heavy mufflers back on.
__________________
1999 w140, quit voting to old, and to old to fight, a god damned veteran
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 01-26-2009, 07:40 PM
diesel123dan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 87
Well, I wouldn't go with a "turbo" muffler or a flowmaster, they robbed a significant ammount of power when I tried them. You want a straight-through design. A cherry bomb will do fine if you have a turbodiesel, mine just didn't sound good because mine was a N/A. The longer the muffler, the quieter it will be, also a turn out helps resonation to a minimum.

BTW: I do have a flex pipe connecting the downpipe to the system. There is just enough space to keep it from hitting the starter. However, a longer positive battery cable is needed.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 01-26-2009, 07:47 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Just because the muffler has "turbo" in the name does not mean its made for turbo engines. Flowlackers aren't any better.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 01-26-2009, 10:36 PM
diesel123dan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 87
"turbo" muffler:
http://store.summitracing.com/partdetail.asp?autofilter=1&part=SUM%2D630130&N=700+115&autoview=sku

muffler for turbo:
http://store.summitracing.com/partdetail.asp?autofilter=1&part=MOR%2D94051&N=700+115&autoview=sku

Flowmasters do wonders for a N/A V8, but not so for turbo setups, especially diesels.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 01-26-2009, 10:49 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForcedInduction View Post
The wagons have a large air vortex at the back that sucks in the exhaust. You might not smell it because of door seals doing their job but the paint will show it soon enough.
Paint still show very little, certainly no more than before the move.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 01-27-2009, 10:01 AM
oldsinner111's Avatar
lied to for years
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Elizabethton, TN
Posts: 6,249
Hey thanks for the info.
__________________
1999 w140, quit voting to old, and to old to fight, a god damned veteran
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 01-28-2009, 04:51 PM
revans's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 31
Speaking from experience the 300TD tailpipe should face out to the side, not straight back. If it points straight back you WILL get nasty diesel exhaust leaking into the cabin. There is low air pressure created by the shape of the body that will trap the exhaust behind the vehicle. when you open the windows at 30mph and above the decreased cabin pressure while suck the exhaust inside. My wagon came with the exhaust pipe facing back from the PO who must have had it worked on by muffler shop that didn't know what they were doing. Once I changed the direction of the tail pipe the exhaust leak problem was gone. Finally got rid of the exhaust problem with my 300TD Turbo Wagon
http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/members/revans-albums-exhaust-picture860-exhaust1a.jpg

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page