|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Turbocharging NA 606
Just wondering if anyone has tried this. There is a 95 nearby for a good price. Does the NA 606 suffer from the lack of piston jets etc like the NA 617? What differences are there in IPs? Anything else I should be aware of?
__________________
For Sale: 1982 MB 300TD 1995 Chevrolet Suburban 6.5TD Sold: 1980 IH Scout Traveler- Nissan SD33T Diesel |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Its weaker built. Thinner rods, less piston material, no piston cooling and different camshafts.
The 95 has mechanical controls. All the 96+ models were completely computer controlled. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks, I guess that pretty much clears that up, the differences in those photos is very dramatic.
__________________
For Sale: 1982 MB 300TD 1995 Chevrolet Suburban 6.5TD Sold: 1980 IH Scout Traveler- Nissan SD33T Diesel |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Yup! Up until I saw those photos, I had no proof that an NA OM606 was any different (other than the obvious things...) than the .962....
In the end, I'm very happy I ended up with my .962 - it's pretty quick bone stock, mileage is good and I know it'll take to mods like a fish to water. The W210 chassis on the other hand is pretty complicated and not as bulletproof as the W124... I came close to buying a '95 W124...I'm glad I didn't. Cheers, Matt
__________________
'99 W210/OM606.962 - bone stock for now. '94 Dodge/Cummins - NV5600, P7100, ~400hp '96 Jeep ZJ - Cummins ISB 170/Allison LCT-1000 conversion project basket case '00 VW Jedi - 345k, bone stock |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
I read somewhere had been contemplating or had actually done a turbo on a NA OM605. They swore up and down that it was robust enough to handle it. I would say yes, maybe to a point.
Probably 25 more HP would not hurt anything.
__________________
-Evan Benz Fleet: 1968 UNIMOG 404.114 1998 E300 2008 E63 Non-Benz Fleet: 1992 Aerostar 1993 MR2 2000 F250 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
There are some folks that claim that NA OM606's are good to 400hp with stock internals + boost + fuel...
__________________
'99 W210/OM606.962 - bone stock for now. '94 Dodge/Cummins - NV5600, P7100, ~400hp '96 Jeep ZJ - Cummins ISB 170/Allison LCT-1000 conversion project basket case '00 VW Jedi - 345k, bone stock |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
I'd think it would last a while but the question is how long?
__________________
-Evan Benz Fleet: 1968 UNIMOG 404.114 1998 E300 2008 E63 Non-Benz Fleet: 1992 Aerostar 1993 MR2 2000 F250 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Depends.
A turbo OM606 might only last 30 seconds in the right hands and under certain conditions. That goes for any engine, though. Stronger rods, better pistons - with oil nozzles aimed at them - those two things alone equate to a much more robust setup. Better parts with more cooling and lubrication - you almost can't loose. Once more folks here in the US start turning up the wicks on OM606 engines, we'll see how they last. All indications are leading us to believe that the folks in Europe are having nothing but good experiences with them in the higher HP levels (400+). I hope to have my daily driver at 400hp in the next few years. Down the road, I also plan on having a more race-ready version up over 600hp. Cheers, Matt
__________________
'99 W210/OM606.962 - bone stock for now. '94 Dodge/Cummins - NV5600, P7100, ~400hp '96 Jeep ZJ - Cummins ISB 170/Allison LCT-1000 conversion project basket case '00 VW Jedi - 345k, bone stock |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
look at this
http://www.holysmoke.fi/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3291&sid=c1fb307afb487ab8b99a583a4aa3a08d NA 4-valves seems to withstand much beating based upon experience, eventhough weaker pistons/rods |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
#dieselFLEET --------------- '97 E300 '99 E300 |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Looks like it's clear that the NA verison is weaker, but with claims that it can still support some power, it's very encouraging. I've always wanted to add a small turbo to mine, mimick the OM606 layout (i.e. intake, exhaust manifold and intercooler), but run the turbo to a lower level, say up to 10lbs of boost to keep it safe, but give the car a little more get up and go and (hopefully), not worry about the engine blowing up. With a really small turbo and quick spool up time, it would help the NA version's get up and out of the way a little faster.
Maybe one day :-) But then I would need someone to make a custom tune to put it all together.
__________________
#dieselFLEET --------------- '97 E300 '99 E300 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Just a correction for future googlers: the OM606.910 NA does in fact have piston cooling oil squirters. This is per the MBZ intro-to-service book for the OM606. Only internal difference is the smaller conrods.
__________________
RIP: 2011 E350 BlueTEC, Schwartz 81k (totaled by uninsured drunk driver) 1964 Unimog 404.1 (wrongfully towed by the city) 1994 E320, Brilliantsilber 208k (transmission shuffled off after sudden catastrophic fluid loss) 1982 300D, Silberblau under a blue repaint 256k (sold for parts) 1995 E320 Polarweiss, 131k (sold for parts) 1995 E300D Polarweiss, 287k (totaled by drunk driver) |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Dont bother. The rods and wrist pins are smaller.
Quote:
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Yet the consensus on the STD forum is the NA variants are still good for ~300hp...
__________________
1978 300D, 373,000km 617.912, 711.113 5 speed, 7.5mm superpump, HX30W turbo...many, many years in the making.... 1977 280> 300D - 500,000km+ (to be sold...) 1984 240TD>300TD 121,000 miles, *gone* 1977 250 parts car 1988 Toyota Corona 2.0D *gone* 1975 FJ45>HJ45 1981 200>240D (to be sold...) 1999 Hyundai Lantra 1.6 *gone* 1980s Lansing Bagnall FOER 5.2 Forklift (the Mk2 engine hoist) 2001 Holden Rodeo 4JB1T 2WD |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Yes fundamentally the motor makes some amount of power without doing anything at all to it. But most people going to the trouble of fabricating exhaust and intake manifolds, intercoolers and down pipes and adding turbo sand modifying injection pumps want a bit more bang for their 5 grand.Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
|
Bookmarks |
|
|