Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion > Diesel Performance Tuning

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-20-2009, 12:18 PM
Bajaman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bern, Switzerland
Posts: 713
Turbocharging NA 606

Just wondering if anyone has tried this. There is a 95 nearby for a good price. Does the NA 606 suffer from the lack of piston jets etc like the NA 617? What differences are there in IPs? Anything else I should be aware of?

__________________
For Sale: 1982 MB 300TD
1995 Chevrolet Suburban 6.5TD

Sold: 1980 IH Scout Traveler- Nissan SD33T Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-20-2009, 12:47 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Its weaker built. Thinner rods, less piston material, no piston cooling and different camshafts.

The 95 has mechanical controls. All the 96+ models were completely computer controlled.

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-20-2009, 01:05 PM
Bajaman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bern, Switzerland
Posts: 713
Thanks, I guess that pretty much clears that up, the differences in those photos is very dramatic.
__________________
For Sale: 1982 MB 300TD
1995 Chevrolet Suburban 6.5TD

Sold: 1980 IH Scout Traveler- Nissan SD33T Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-21-2009, 02:09 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin (Columbia County)
Posts: 25
Yup! Up until I saw those photos, I had no proof that an NA OM606 was any different (other than the obvious things...) than the .962....

In the end, I'm very happy I ended up with my .962 - it's pretty quick bone stock, mileage is good and I know it'll take to mods like a fish to water.

The W210 chassis on the other hand is pretty complicated and not as bulletproof as the W124... I came close to buying a '95 W124...I'm glad I didn't.

Cheers,

Matt
__________________
'99 W210/OM606.962 - bone stock for now.
'94 Dodge/Cummins - NV5600, P7100, ~400hp
'96 Jeep ZJ - Cummins ISB 170/Allison LCT-1000 conversion project basket case
'00 VW Jedi - 345k, bone stock
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-21-2009, 02:34 PM
KarTek's Avatar
<- Ryuko of Kill La Kill
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bahama/Eno Twp, NC
Posts: 3,258
I read somewhere had been contemplating or had actually done a turbo on a NA OM605. They swore up and down that it was robust enough to handle it. I would say yes, maybe to a point.

Probably 25 more HP would not hurt anything.
__________________
-Evan


Benz Fleet:
1968 UNIMOG 404.114
1998 E300
2008 E63


Non-Benz Fleet:
1992 Aerostar
1993 MR2
2000 F250
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-26-2009, 01:24 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin (Columbia County)
Posts: 25
There are some folks that claim that NA OM606's are good to 400hp with stock internals + boost + fuel...
__________________
'99 W210/OM606.962 - bone stock for now.
'94 Dodge/Cummins - NV5600, P7100, ~400hp
'96 Jeep ZJ - Cummins ISB 170/Allison LCT-1000 conversion project basket case
'00 VW Jedi - 345k, bone stock
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-26-2009, 03:10 PM
KarTek's Avatar
<- Ryuko of Kill La Kill
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bahama/Eno Twp, NC
Posts: 3,258
I'd think it would last a while but the question is how long?
__________________
-Evan


Benz Fleet:
1968 UNIMOG 404.114
1998 E300
2008 E63


Non-Benz Fleet:
1992 Aerostar
1993 MR2
2000 F250
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-27-2009, 01:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin (Columbia County)
Posts: 25
Depends.
A turbo OM606 might only last 30 seconds in the right hands and under certain conditions. That goes for any engine, though.

Stronger rods, better pistons - with oil nozzles aimed at them - those two things alone equate to a much more robust setup. Better parts with more cooling and lubrication - you almost can't loose.

Once more folks here in the US start turning up the wicks on OM606 engines, we'll see how they last. All indications are leading us to believe that the folks in Europe are having nothing but good experiences with them in the higher HP levels (400+). I hope to have my daily driver at 400hp in the next few years. Down the road, I also plan on having a more race-ready version up over 600hp.

Cheers,

Matt
__________________
'99 W210/OM606.962 - bone stock for now.
'94 Dodge/Cummins - NV5600, P7100, ~400hp
'96 Jeep ZJ - Cummins ISB 170/Allison LCT-1000 conversion project basket case
'00 VW Jedi - 345k, bone stock
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-27-2009, 05:19 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 24
look at this

http://www.holysmoke.fi/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3291&sid=c1fb307afb487ab8b99a583a4aa3a08d

NA 4-valves seems to withstand much beating based upon experience, eventhough weaker pistons/rods
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-02-2009, 11:29 AM
michakaveli's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 1,719
Quote:
Originally Posted by lars1 View Post
look at this

http://www.holysmoke.fi/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3291&sid=c1fb307afb487ab8b99a583a4aa3a08d

NA 4-valves seems to withstand much beating based upon experience, eventhough weaker pistons/rods
Whats the password for that forum thread?
__________________
#dieselFLEET
---------------
'97 E300
'99 E300
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-02-2009, 11:41 AM
michakaveli's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 1,719
Looks like it's clear that the NA verison is weaker, but with claims that it can still support some power, it's very encouraging. I've always wanted to add a small turbo to mine, mimick the OM606 layout (i.e. intake, exhaust manifold and intercooler), but run the turbo to a lower level, say up to 10lbs of boost to keep it safe, but give the car a little more get up and go and (hopefully), not worry about the engine blowing up. With a really small turbo and quick spool up time, it would help the NA version's get up and out of the way a little faster.

Maybe one day :-) But then I would need someone to make a custom tune to put it all together.
__________________
#dieselFLEET
---------------
'97 E300
'99 E300
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-22-2018, 10:11 PM
Luxury Hooptie Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Screwston, TX
Posts: 347
Just a correction for future googlers: the OM606.910 NA does in fact have piston cooling oil squirters. This is per the MBZ intro-to-service book for the OM606. Only internal difference is the smaller conrods.
__________________
RIP:
2011 E350 BlueTEC, Schwartz 81k (totaled by uninsured drunk driver)
1964 Unimog 404.1 (wrongfully towed by the city)
1994 E320, Brilliantsilber 208k (transmission shuffled off after sudden catastrophic fluid loss)
1982 300D, Silberblau under a blue repaint 256k (sold for parts)
1995 E320 Polarweiss, 131k (sold for parts)
1995 E300D Polarweiss, 287k (totaled by drunk driver)
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-24-2018, 05:19 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 242
Dont bother. The rods and wrist pins are smaller.
Quote:
Originally Posted by michakaveli View Post
Looks like it's clear that the NA verison is weaker, but with claims that it can still support some power, it's very encouraging. I've always wanted to add a small turbo to mine, mimick the OM606 layout (i.e. intake, exhaust manifold and intercooler), but run the turbo to a lower level, say up to 10lbs of boost to keep it safe, but give the car a little more get up and go and (hopefully), not worry about the engine blowing up. With a really small turbo and quick spool up time, it would help the NA version's get up and out of the way a little faster.

Maybe one day :-) But then I would need someone to make a custom tune to put it all together.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-25-2018, 02:30 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 538
Yet the consensus on the STD forum is the NA variants are still good for ~300hp...
__________________
1978 300D, 373,000km 617.912, 711.113 5 speed, 7.5mm superpump, HX30W turbo...many, many years in the making....
1977 280> 300D - 500,000km+ (to be sold...)
1984 240TD>300TD 121,000 miles, *gone*
1977 250 parts car
1988 Toyota Corona 2.0D *gone*
1975 FJ45>HJ45
1981 200>240D (to be sold...)
1999 Hyundai Lantra 1.6 *gone*
1980s Lansing Bagnall FOER 5.2 Forklift (the Mk2 engine hoist)
2001 Holden Rodeo 4JB1T 2WD

Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-25-2018, 02:44 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 242
Yes fundamentally the motor makes some amount of power without doing anything at all to it. But most people going to the trouble of fabricating exhaust and intake manifolds, intercoolers and down pipes and adding turbo sand modifying injection pumps want a bit more bang for their 5 grand.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NZScott View Post
Yet the consensus on the STD forum is the NA variants are still good for ~300hp...
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page