Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Mercedes-Benz Performance Paddock

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-17-2001, 07:32 PM
waynoe
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Got a few questions re/ the m103 2.6 vs the 3.0, my roommate is an MBZ mech and he says there the same but for some reason the head is not interchangeble -and cannot provide a reason why-. Before I get into the Q's, here is my objective: I want to bump the displacement of the 190e m103 2.6 motor (90'+) using OE internals.

1)What are the block differences other than cylinder size (deck height, main bearing widths) between the 2 motors?

2)Barring any major unforeseen variances, could the 2.6 block be milled to accept the standard 3.0 piston -I think the 2.6 is 83mm and the 3.0 is 89-, is there enuff block material, would pin height be an issue?

3)What is the crank stroke and rod length difference?, basically could the 2.6 block be milled to accept the 3.o internals w/o changing compression?

4) If this simply wont work what in your opinion be the largest DEPENDABLE cylinder rebore for the 2.6 block?

Any and all comments and opinions are greatly appreciated, thanks for the great forum!
wayne

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-18-2001, 10:56 AM
LarryBible
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The reason the head is different between the two engines, I'm sure is combustion chamber volume. When displacement changes, the combustion chamber volume has to change to keep the compression ratio correct.

I've never even checked to see if the difference in these two engines is bore, stroke or both. But if you insist on going to a 3.0 displacement engine, your best bet will be to buy a long block. The other item you must consider is that the injection system is set up for a 2.6 engine, not a 3.0. You must research the injection system thoroughly, it may be that you only need a different CIS unit, or it may be that all electronics must change. I expect that the throttle body is a little smaller on the 2.6. If so, you would have a restricted intake system and would gain little by increasing the displacement.

If you really want performance, on this 3.0, and are willing to give up mid range and smooth idle, use an early '86 camshaft.

You will need to do lots and lots of research before undertaking this project or you will end up with a dog.

Of course, the easiest way to get more performance is to buy a different car, it will prevent many disappointments and headaches, guaranteed. With that said, if you have the space, equipment, tools and total, committed desire to do this project, in that case it will probably be therapy.

Good luck,

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
190E Motor Mount Replacement haasman Tech Help 9 04-03-2009 02:59 PM
Anyone had this problem with the M103 motor??? mike690003 Tech Help 13 09-24-2003 08:31 PM
How to remove A/C blower squirrel cage from motor?? jshaheen Tech Help 3 09-19-2003 11:52 AM
What Blower Motor Fuse?? EricSilver Tech Help 20 10-06-2002 12:14 AM
190E 2.6 swap out for 3.2 12 valve motor 2phast Mercedes-Benz Performance Paddock 8 08-17-2001 08:22 AM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page