Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Mercedes-Benz Performance Paddock

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-15-2002, 02:45 PM
Potomac German Auto
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 407
Question 2.3-16 Cams ?

MBDOC- I figured that you could answer this rather qucikly. Aside from GTC who makes cams that will give you the higher lift needed to help the 16-valve climb through the lower RPM ranges? I have heard that one guy fabricated his own. Any thoughts or ideas ?

__________________
1994 E500 (MY SUNDAY DRIVER)
1993 190E SPORTLINE LE W/ M104 SWAP
1997 C230
2002 ML320
2000 BMW 528I (WIFEY'S CAR)

"Excuses are crutches for the unfounded."
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-15-2002, 05:18 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Tucker, Ga USA
Posts: 12,153
The stock cams are really GOOD! I have played around with several cams & NO real improvement in HP unless you spin the engine at least 7500. & they won't last long there.
Only 3 HP increase, MAX.
NONE will help in the bottom end range, only at the top.
Benzmac picked up a few by having the cam gears modified allowing 4-5 degrees of cam timing change. Slotted bolt holes.
__________________
MERCEDES Benz Master Guild Technician (6 TIMES)
ASE Master Technician
Mercedes Benz Star Technician (2 times)
44 years foreign automotive repair
27 Years M.B. Shop foreman (dealer)
MB technical information Specialist (15 years)
190E 2.3 16V ITS SCCA race car (sold)
1986 190E 2.3 16V 2.5 (sold)
Retired Moderator
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-16-2002, 07:58 AM
Potomac German Auto
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 407
Post

Thanks DOC that is exactly the kind of information I was seeking.
__________________
1994 E500 (MY SUNDAY DRIVER)
1993 190E SPORTLINE LE W/ M104 SWAP
1997 C230
2002 ML320
2000 BMW 528I (WIFEY'S CAR)

"Excuses are crutches for the unfounded."
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-16-2002, 09:07 AM
Jim Villers's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 490
I also thank you for your comments. I have thought about cams but had not yet felt the need. I am currently installing an SDS Injection System on my 16 vlave. When I get the tuning figured out and it run on a dyno, I'll post the results and pictures to my web page.
__________________
Jim Villers
190SL, 230SL 5-speed, 95 E320 Wagon, 01 E320 Wagon, MGB, Boxster 'S', 190SL "Barn Find"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-16-2002, 02:53 PM
Itgb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 152
Jim,

That is awesome that you got the electronic fuel injection system for your 16V. That is supposed to be the main problem for our cars in comparison to the E30 M3. How much was the system, I would love to do it to mine, but I wouldn't be able to do the labor myself like you are doing. The price for labor to do something like that is just too much. Anyways good luck with it, I can't wait to see your results.

Giancarlo
__________________
PAST MB's: 2006 E55 AMG | 1986 190E 2.3-16
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-16-2002, 07:08 PM
emr0591
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Say MB DOC, do your views on cams include the cams supplied from Bekkers and Schrick of Germany? I was condiering getting one for my '87 300E. By the way , did the '86-88 300E's have "hotter" cams---were they actually faster than the '89-'92's?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-16-2002, 10:06 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 713
the 86s-88s were faster than the later models, but im not sure if this is because of the hotter cams, I know the changed rear end ratio had a lot to do with it though...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-21-2002, 09:42 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: England
Posts: 1,841
I read here not long ago the 86-88 300E had slightly more aggressive cams than later models.. but I think MBDOC is only talking about the 190 16vs when he says there is little improvement to be had. The head and cams were engineered by Cosworth in the UK, who created, among many other masterpieces, the most succesful racing engine ever (Ford / Cosworth DFV V8).. they new what they were doing when they chose the cam, I wouldn't change it just for the sake of it!

Change something which is worth improving and wasn't designed & chosen by master engineers (nothing springs to mind though)



later

Russ
__________________
190E's:
2.5-16v 1990 90,000m Astral Silver
2.0E 8v 1986 107,000m Black 2nd owner
http://www.maylane.demon.co.uk/190esmall.jpghttp://www.maylane.demon.co.uk/190esmall2.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-22-2002, 12:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 9
cams

Are the cams in the european versions of the 16 valves different in any way to the one´s in north america? Or are there any differences from a 1987 2.3-16 euro to a 1987 2.3-16 us?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-22-2002, 07:54 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 150
i think the cams are the same. the difference is the euro is a 10.5:1 comp ratio and the us is a 9.7:1. the euro also did not have catalytic converter.
__________________
dew
86' 190e 2.3L 16v
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-22-2002, 09:24 PM
Itgb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 152
The euro also has a different rear axle ratio of 3.07 compared to the 3.27 of the U.S. version.

Giancarlo
__________________
PAST MB's: 2006 E55 AMG | 1986 190E 2.3-16
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-23-2002, 12:41 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Tucker, Ga USA
Posts: 12,153
The euro 16V in 1985 had 10.5/1 compression. However when Germany required catalytic converters in 1986 the compression dropped to 9.7/1. The HP difference is ignition timing & fuel mixture. Also the DIN HP is different than the SAE HP ratings, so they are always higher.
The cams even on the 190E 2.5 16V are even the same as the US ones. ONLY the intake cam on the "street" evo 2.5's are hotter that what comes from the factory. AS I said unless you buzz the engine above 7500 there isn't much to gain. And at that point the fuel system & intake manifold would limit any real gains.
__________________
MERCEDES Benz Master Guild Technician (6 TIMES)
ASE Master Technician
Mercedes Benz Star Technician (2 times)
44 years foreign automotive repair
27 Years M.B. Shop foreman (dealer)
MB technical information Specialist (15 years)
190E 2.3 16V ITS SCCA race car (sold)
1986 190E 2.3 16V 2.5 (sold)
Retired Moderator
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-23-2002, 06:08 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 150
great post MB DOC. that's some stuff i never knew.

while i'm writing i've got a question for MB DOC. gernerally speaking, when i install the turbo kit on my 16v will running hotter cams do much for me (worth the investment)? i'm not doing anything to the fuel system other than setting it for more enrichment with the computer that comes with the kit, and maybe additionally with the cold start valve. and, the only thing i'm doing the ignition is additing a jacobs coil and controller. how about a hotter intake cam and a slight retard on the exhaust cam gear (worth it)? my understanding is that will, if anything, give me a slightly higher peak torque while likely lowering the area under the torque curve. i might go to 8000 RPM valve springs but most of the time the engine will be in the 4000 to 7000 RPM range. this is a %98 street car (2% track) always driven hard but only rarely driven above 100 mph on the street.

i know i need to buy the book "Maximum Boost" for comprehensive answers: i just haven't gotten around it it yet.

thanks
__________________
dew
86' 190e 2.3L 16v

Last edited by jasondew; 04-23-2002 at 06:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-23-2002, 10:30 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Suwanee, GA, USA
Posts: 4,712
I do have some turbo experience. It tells me that on turbo motors, the milder the cam, the more boost you can run, thus, more power. I would choose the mildest cams for the turbo car and run a monster intercooler.

Tuning is a must. You will want to spend some real time on a dyno to get the ignition and fuel perfect.
__________________
Benzmac:
Donnie Drummonds
ASE CERTIFIED MASTER AUTO TECHNICIAN
MERCEDES SPECIALIST 11 YRS
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-24-2002, 12:21 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 150
that's what i thought. so, i'm going to continue to use my stock cams. i'm limited on my intercooler size by the one that comes with the kit. i don't want to have one custom fabricated and start changing around the location of a lot of things on my vehicle. i plan to run water injection and a some additional fuel enrichment with a manual under the hood boost controller. the tuning will be done by someone who knows better than i do how to do this stuff.

thanks man,

__________________
dew
86' 190e 2.3L 16v
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
190E headlight for sale like new 2.3 2.6 2.3 16v euroamg Mercedes-Benz Used Parts For Sale & Wanted 4 02-22-2005 06:27 PM
replacing 4.5 cams with 3.5 cams tosbt Vintage Mercedes Forum 7 05-07-2004 07:46 AM
4.5 cams: The final chapter! Tomguy Vintage Mercedes Forum 5 02-23-2004 03:29 PM
2.3 8V air flow sensor work in a 16v daveCT Tech Help 1 02-19-2003 10:57 AM
16V cams compatibility alexkor Tech Help 1 02-17-2003 12:36 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page