Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Mercedes-Benz SL Discussion Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-10-2005, 10:29 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 130
SL's must be more reliable.......

because we don't get near as many posts as the other sections??? Just a coincendence? I know there are more deisels out there as part of the issue....but those SL's are classy head turners...

__________________
Eric Boyles
1980 450SL
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-10-2005, 10:55 PM
BusyBenz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I've hit just about all the SL forums on the web and all are sleepers! Not much happening. Everytime I check sites like OurSL, I always feel like I'm the only one there, and get the feeling I need to shut the lights off before I leave! However, there has been about equal activity to this forum over at benzwirled lately.......
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-10-2005, 11:07 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Milwaukee Wisconsin
Posts: 1,150
I have an excuse. My SL is stored for the winter months. I believe that most SL owners who live up here is the salt belt also store for the winter. It's not a winter car. Who wants to drive down the road with the top down when the temperatures are below freezing and the salt is flying? Where I live, they cover the roads with salt to match the snow depth. So for every inch of snow we get an inch of salt. The salt piles up into drifts at intersections, so we have to drive 4wd Jeeps in the winter to avoid getting stuck in a salt drift. They don't call it the rust belt for no reason.
__________________
Resistance is Futile.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-10-2005, 11:10 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 130
hard top man, hard top. thats what I like about the car. Regular car to a convertible (with a soft top as safety valve).....
__________________
Eric Boyles
1980 450SL
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-11-2005, 12:30 AM
Speed Junkie
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 82
reliability...

kind of like a wife, she only goes haywire every now and again.
but like a mistress on the side, she's hot as hell.

all jokes aside, as long as you don't have the years with wiring issues, most other problems are soft top related and not all that expensive to fix, relatively speaking.

They can leak oil a bit too, but all cars do. Just more expensive to re-seal ours.

As long as the car is properly maintained, she should give you far far more joy than trouble. There are exceptions, and expensive ones at that, but they are far far less than the majority.

Justin
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-11-2005, 02:08 AM
Boudreaux's Avatar
Mein Name ist Dieter.
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pearland, TX
Posts: 174
Cool R 129 Models are a classic design that never ages.

My car is 11 years old and maintained to the best of my ability (aka bank account) to keep it running. I only wish I won the lottery and could buy two more R129's in the only colors that I really like: dark blue metallic and firemist red. I wouldn't even consider a '03-current SL since they don't have that certain panache that the R129's have.
__________________
'94 SL500 Tourmaline Green, 120K miles as of February 27, 2005.

http://home.earthlink.net/~boudreaux...ictures/17.jpg
Updated photo September 2004

Last edited by Boudreaux; 03-11-2005 at 02:23 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-11-2005, 07:07 AM
Jake Galvin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Check out MBWORLD.ORG seems alot of owners of the R230 SL are having endless problems.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-11-2005, 11:03 AM
"99 SL500
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Jacksonville Fla.
Posts: 332
reliable

Don't say that I have fallen in love with a silver 2005 SL 55 AMG.I better do some research before I trade the 99 SL 500.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-11-2005, 11:24 AM
1984 280SL
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bellevue Washington
Posts: 56
I would have to agree they are reliable. My 1980 280 SL 4 speed has 171,000 miles and is mostly all original. I have only replaced the water pump, alternator and fuel pump relay. Still original clutch, shocks and exhaust system. Not bad for 25 years. My 1984 280 SL 5 speed has 75,000 miles on it but I have only owned it for 8 months now but it is also mostly original according to the service records I received. There were a few things replaced that should not have been but it looks like it was a case of the mechanic taking advantage of a nice old lady original owner. It is in need of nothing at this time and runs and looks like new.
__________________
1980 280SL
2012 C6 Red Corvette
2013 C6 Black Corvette
X5 BMW 4.4
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-11-2005, 04:45 PM
Boudreaux's Avatar
Mein Name ist Dieter.
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pearland, TX
Posts: 174
Smile Do some serious research before trading in your '99 SL 500

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carlos Serrano
Don't say that I have fallen in love with a silver 2005 SL 55 AMG.I better do some research before I trade the 99 SL 500.
These websites have mentioned the countless problems with the R230's and other MB models that make you go, 'Hmmmmmm'.

Lemon MB lists all models and the numerous complaints by the owners being treated like trash and given the run around by dealers.
www.lemonmb.com

This website is ok and not as updated frequently with problems.
www.mercedesproblems.com

IMHO, keep the '99 SL500. She's gonna have problems in the future but not as many as the R230's. Plus the profile and style of the R129's are truly a remarkable aesthetic testament to the German philosophy of creating something beautiful. The R230's look like a mutant Porsche 928 with a big ass.

Good luck.
__________________
'94 SL500 Tourmaline Green, 120K miles as of February 27, 2005.

http://home.earthlink.net/~boudreaux...ictures/17.jpg
Updated photo September 2004
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-15-2005, 04:26 PM
"99 SL500
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Jacksonville Fla.
Posts: 332
reliable

I've been looking for reasons to trade my 99 SL 500 but to be honest I can not, besides the fact that the 2005 SL55 is price at 86,000 and that is a lot of money even for 1700 miles used car with a bi-turbo powerplant,I can not complaint about my R129, little things here and there that can be describe as normal wear and tear are the only complaints I have, the parts can be expensive we all know that but that is part of it, expensive car expensive parts. A hell of a thrill to drive open top on the hwy knowing well that you can make just about anybody look like they are going backwards in your rear view mirror, so maybe I just keep my 99 and find me a house with a bigger garage.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-15-2005, 08:11 PM
Strife's Avatar
General Purpose Geek
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: KY USA
Posts: 2,238
Hmmm...well, there's some fundamental things going on here:

1. The 107 SL is rooted in 1960's/early 70's technology with some 1980's electronics (discrete components) towards the end. Inherently, simpler. I've read that the parts count in an average car increased FIVE TIMES between 1970 and 2000. So, if the cars were "as reliable" as they were 30 years ago, they'd break five times more often (a gross simplification - because of interrelated problems and interconnects, it would actually be worse than this).

2. They don't contain all the unneeded crap "modern" cars contain. Examples: How many top problems will you find on 129's with the limit switches, microcontroller and hydraulics? With the 107, if your arms work and you have a screwdriver and a ratchet set, you can either work the top or fix darn near anything. Worst case: a $10 mechanical cable. Power seats? Yes-you power them. Power side mirrors? Yes, your power. Even the maligned vacuum systems - if you have a real understanding of them and a manual, a $30 Mitivac and some choice obscenities in your vocabulary, you can fix it - and you don't need a specialized $1000's of dollars dealer only test set.

3. These cars are generally loved and maintained; many are not exposed to bad weather at all.

4. As much as 107 owners complain about the costs of parts, get a reality check and price some parts for a 21'st century dirtball Ford. I suspect that many of us are older and remember when one of the finest distirbutor caps that could be had at any price - an Accel epoxy distributor cap for an 8-cylinder Camaro - was $15.00. That was a long time ago.

I need to occasionally remind myself that I have a car that cost approximately my gross income for the year when it was new!
__________________
86 560SL
With homebrew first gear start!
85 380SL
Daily Driver Project

http://juliepalooza.8m.com/sl/mercedes.htm
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-15-2005, 09:31 PM
Boudreaux's Avatar
Mein Name ist Dieter.
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pearland, TX
Posts: 174
Talking Good choice, dude. Keep the '99 SL 500

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carlos Serrano
I've been looking for reasons to trade my 99 SL 500 but to be honest I can not, besides the fact that the 2005 SL55 is price at 86,000 and that is a lot of money even for 1700 miles used car with a bi-turbo powerplant,I can not complaint about my R129, little things here and there that can be describe as normal wear and tear are the only complaints I have, the parts can be expensive we all know that but that is part of it, expensive car expensive parts. A hell of a thrill to drive open top on the hwy knowing well that you can make just about anybody look like they are going backwards in your rear view mirror, so maybe I just keep my 99 and find me a house with a bigger garage.
IMHO the R129 is more of a "head-turner" than the R230's.

Keep your '99 SL500 and put your money to better use (imagine spending $86K and having all of those problems that were mentioned at lemonmb.com...I would be so p*ssed I would probably go postal at a stealership).

Good luck and Happy Benzing.
__________________
'94 SL500 Tourmaline Green, 120K miles as of February 27, 2005.

http://home.earthlink.net/~boudreaux...ictures/17.jpg
Updated photo September 2004
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-16-2005, 08:01 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 177
SL's must be more reliable......

Sorry to throw you fellows off track, I keep hearing mentioned "Mitivac" what is one? It apparently lives well in testing vacum lines, never heard of one in Australia. Please enlighten me. Politely!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-16-2005, 10:54 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 46
A MityVac is...

Basically it's like a syringe that allows a mechanic to create vacuum to test vacuum-related systems for leaks. They might go by another name in your neck of the woods, but I'm sure they exist. The typical size is smaller than a large can of spray paint.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SLS Valve in 190E 2.3-16v defective ??? mercedes16valve Tech Help 5 11-05-2004 09:17 PM
Late Model 190e 16v SLS Removal (Already Searched) Uk Merc Man Tech Help 2 09-01-2004 04:55 AM
Late Model 190e 16v SLS Removal (Already Searched) Uk Merc Man Tech Help 2 07-08-2004 12:11 AM
500E SLS suspension question kiato4 Tech Help 1 10-05-2003 11:52 PM
190E SLS accumulators alexkor Tech Help 0 11-18-2002 09:15 AM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page