Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Mercedes-Benz SL Discussion Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-09-2006, 10:36 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 286
Question Air Filter Suggestions 129/113 engine

I want to replace the air and cabin filters on my '99 SL500. The parts guys list the usual suspects, Mann, Hengst, K&N, etc. with the big difference, it seems, that the upper end filters are washable/re-useable. Does it make sense to spring for a pair of the washable type? Appreciate all comments-

Bob

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-09-2006, 02:14 PM
"99 SL500
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Jacksonville Fla.
Posts: 332
Cabin filter

Usually I just get them from Phil at the buy part section of this forum, top of the page.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-10-2006, 10:13 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 286
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carlos Serrano View Post
Usually I just get them from Phil at the buy part section of this forum, top of the page.
Thanks Carlos, I'll keep that in mind when I get some help on which to buy. My real need is to understand which of the types of filters, disposable or 'cleanable', is better for the air intake/engine performance. Hengst and Mann, to the best of my knowledge, are OEM; K&N is not and take a different approach. This should be simple, but apparently is not, at least to me.

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-10-2006, 04:49 PM
page62's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Luckenbach, Texas
Posts: 436
Personally, I tend to stay away from the reusable filter. The paper filters tned to remove a smaller particulate size, and there is no risk of a re-oiled filter fouling the MAF.

Also, Mercedes tends to over-engineer their air filters, so the filter itself probably doesn't represent any sort of a "bottleneck" that needs to be remedied.

So consider this a vote for the Hengst/Mann filters.
__________________
'01 SLK320, '79 450SL & '01 C320 -- What? 3 Mercedes? I am DEFINITELY crazy!!!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-10-2006, 05:25 PM
NoSpark's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 53
I ran one of those reusable K&N air filters a few years back. I only noticed a difference in the last 300rpm, it certainly breathed better, but at the sort of rpms I rarely approach. That was on a car. On motorcycles/atv's, you'll notice a little loss in bottom end (well, if you removed the airbox...much better to leave these things stock unless you race).

If you do get one, be careful not to oversaturate it. Just about everybody does.
__________________
'64 230SL
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-11-2006, 01:29 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 286
Smile Thanks All

We can retire this discussion thanks to all of you. I'm sticking with the OE paper filters.

Bob

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page