Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Mercedes-Benz SL Discussion Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-06-2007, 11:33 PM
300sdlguy's Avatar
Diesel Poor
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sioux Falls, SD (Dallas Tx)
Posts: 374
Difference btw 90-94 SL's

I am looking at w129's as a gift for my mother. A friend of mine bought a 91 500SL in 1998 on the advice of his Mercedes mechanic in LA. The mechanic told that the 1990-91 were equipped with less complex computer and/or engine management systems, thus easier for independents to work on. I ask because, my mother lives in a rural area and the closest Mercedes dealership is 100 miles away. I have found a flawless 91 300SL with 40,000 miles, but it's for sale at a premium price. I just want to make sure it's true that staying below a 91 year model is a good idea, otherwise I will look at newer models in the same price range.

Thanks for any advice.

__________________
Mercedes Fleet:
2004 CL600 Designo Espresso SPORT
2004 S600 Designo Espresso SPORT/Lorinser Pkg.
1999 S320
1988 300TE
1972 280SEL 4.5
Diesel Fleet:
2014 GL350 Blutec
1987 300SDL Blk/Blk 4 place seating #18 head
1987 300SDL Smk Slv/Burgangy #17 head
1986 300SDL Blk Pearl/Palomino #14 head w/ 280K
1984 Lincoln Mark VII Fact BMW Turbo Diesel

Last edited by 300sdlguy; 10-07-2007 at 12:06 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-07-2007, 09:37 AM
88Black560SL
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 3,510
I belive it's 92 to 95 that also had the wiring issues. So 90 and 91 are probably a good bet.

There were no other significant changes until 96 when they went to a 5 speed trans in the SL500. Generally speaking I think the 96 and up are the best years.

John Roncallo
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-07-2007, 10:22 AM
300sdlguy's Avatar
Diesel Poor
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sioux Falls, SD (Dallas Tx)
Posts: 374
Thanks, good to know as I have found a White 1996 SL320 with the same mileage and price as the Imperial Red 91 300SL, The red if the more favored color, so I wanted to see if there were deciding factors either way.
__________________
Mercedes Fleet:
2004 CL600 Designo Espresso SPORT
2004 S600 Designo Espresso SPORT/Lorinser Pkg.
1999 S320
1988 300TE
1972 280SEL 4.5
Diesel Fleet:
2014 GL350 Blutec
1987 300SDL Blk/Blk 4 place seating #18 head
1987 300SDL Smk Slv/Burgangy #17 head
1986 300SDL Blk Pearl/Palomino #14 head w/ 280K
1984 Lincoln Mark VII Fact BMW Turbo Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-07-2007, 08:35 PM
lynns's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: So. California
Posts: 295
Chris,
93-95 had the engine wiring harness issue.
90-92 are good cars but please make sure that on any R129 that you check out the soft top hydraulics by raising and lowering the top multiple times and asking if any of the hydraulic cylinder seals have been repaired.

IMHO, I would go for a low mileage 99-02 Sport model with a SL2 option package. Prices are less than $30K for a $90K car with a 5 speed trans and you shouldn't have ANY concerns. Here are a couple of beauties http://www.benzworld.org/forums/2571835-post7.html that I have no interest in. Just passing the word.

But if $30K is more than you had in mind I would like to suggest a 86-89 R107 classic. But, check the center A/C vents to make sure they work. I have never seen a Mother that didn't love the R107. Please see http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1989-MERCEDES-BENZ-560SL-NEW-TOP-NEW-A-C_W0QQitemZ280159180005QQihZ018QQcategoryZ6338QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem that I have no interest in. Just passing the word.
__________________
Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Lynn

2000 SL500 Silver
2000 SL500 SOLD
1989 560SL SOLD
1988 560SL SOLD

Last edited by lynns; 10-07-2007 at 10:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-07-2007, 09:34 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Las Vegas, Atlanta
Posts: 670
Quote:
Originally Posted by 300sdlguy View Post
The mechanic told that the 1990-91 were equipped with less complex computer and/or engine management systems, thus easier for independents to work on.
Untrue, though the '96 and later cars require a Mercedes-specific scanner for code reading. I would guess that all Mercedes shops have one.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-08-2007, 02:23 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 51
1991 R129

I purchased a 1991 R129 last year, and have been very pleased. One thing that I would highly suggest is that you get a pre purchase inspection on a car of this age.
I bought mine from a MB dealer, but a pre purchase inspection elsewhere would have some a chunk of money for me in repairs.
Wiring problems started in 1992.
I would stay away from the R107's unless your Mother is a huge classic car fan. The R129's where a huge leap forward in technology, and comfort.

Matt

__________________
1991 Mercedes 500SL
2001 Jaguar XJR
1967 Mustang

Last edited by Doctor2687; 10-08-2007 at 02:25 PM. Reason: adding some ideas
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page