Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help




Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Mercedes-Benz SL Discussion Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-13-2002, 11:11 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 223
560SL vs early 90's SL

It's beginning to look as if the prices for the early '90s SLs (esp the 6 cylinders) are approaching those of the 560SL -- I would appreciate any views on these cars vs the 560SL (assuming, of course, a favorable PPI in both cases), esp driving experience and maintenance costs, being mindful of the early 140s maintenance expenses vs the 126s on the sedan front.

I note that the 300SL came with a manual in that period -- worth seeking out?
__________________
'98 C43 AMG
'88 420SEL
'93 190E Limited Edition (including factory Sportline package)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-13-2002, 11:59 AM
BlackE55
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
R129 6cyl

I was watching the prices too, tempting isn't it? It's no speed demon, but a 5-spd Merc droptop would be a kick!

I haven't read much, if anything on this forum about them. Be interesting to see.

Did a quick search and found this thread: 300SL

Last edited by BlackE55; 06-13-2002 at 12:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-13-2002, 12:26 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 112
In the past 5 months I sold an 1987 560SL and replaced it with a 1992 500SL. There is a world of difference between these two fine cars.

The 560, with roughly 230 horsepower, offers good power until you try the 500. At about 322 horsepower, the 500 is a little slugish off the line but from 40mph on up it is a beast! The suspension of the 500 seems to hold the road much, much better than the 560. I understand tha the 300 offers good power as well.

Being 6', I found the headroom in the 560 to be tight. There is plenty of room in the 500 however. I find the automatic soft top on the 500 to be so easy to use. I find I drive this car more often simply because of the ease of putting the top up.

The stock sound system in the 560 was weak, with just two small speakers. The 500 has about 6 speakers and sounds just fine (even with the dreaded Becker 1432 set up).

The 560 was terrific car for it's time. I love the classic styling and looks, maybe even more so than the 500. But the 500 is so much more car. I can see myself keeping this car for years (or a couple of months if I get a "wild hair). :-)
__________________
Scott
2002 G500
2003 Audi Allroad
1999 Range Rover
1992 500SL (sold)
1999 ML320 (sold)
1989 300SE (sold)
1987 560SL (sold)
1986 300E (sold)
1983 300SD (sold)
1982 300D Turbo (sold)
1980 300D (sold)
1973 450SL (sold)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-13-2002, 12:26 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,562
...drive an R129 vs. the older SL...the R129's chassis is world's ahead

-fad
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-13-2002, 01:37 PM
BlackE55
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
There's a '92 500SL forsale in my local paper for $26K. Only details given are that it's red, chrome wheels and a phone. Who knows the condition, but that's an example of how prices on these babies have come down.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2018 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page