|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Which SL would you buy now???
Posting this in the SL forum, I'm assuming that the readers already have experience with at least one version of the SL line. Knowing what you do about them, and assuming that yours was stolen or something and you are now starting off with replacement $ and a clean garage, which model would you buy to replace it? Please limit the choice to the "older" SL's from the 380 to the 560 models.
I've had 6 of the diesel and gas sedans, and still have the 356 Porsche, but I'm kind of looking for an SL to round out the collection. Many thanks in advance for your sage advice.
__________________
'76 240D-Sold '78 240D-Sold '85 300 SD, 165K-Sold '88 300 TE, 165K-Sold '64 Porsche 356C Cabriolet- under restoration '86 560SL 124K Miles-Sold '94 320E Wagon, 74K Miles-128K Miles JUNKED '06 E350 Wagon, 84K Miles 07 SL550, 14K Miles |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
HI Ron
I haved owned an 85-380SL since new. So I am partial to the 380 Must people like the 560 because of the bigger and faster engine. But you can find some real nice 380's for less then 50% of the cost of the 560. Either car is super. Good luck finding the one you like. Happy driving. Joe Moon 85-380SL-88k 94-E320Sedan-63k 95-E320Cabriolet-62k
__________________
joe moon/95Benzman |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I think a post-1985 Euro 500SL would best fit my needs; failing that a post-1985 300SL. The latter may not have the performance, but the engine is (I am told) a delight. Post-1985 because these cars for me have the best looks and also all the mod-cons as well as good rust proofing.
__________________
JJ Rodger 2013 G350 Bluetec 1999 SL 500 1993 E300 diesel T 1990 190 |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
If I had to do it over again, I would go with a 560SL. More power and firmer ride.
__________________
Eric, 1983 500 SL |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I currently have a 380SL but I would choose either a 560SL or a 500SL any day. They are more powerful and tighter.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I love my 560SL, and I'd do another one in a heartbeat--if it weren't that the 500SL can give you the non-automatic non-quixotic dual-temp AC system, the Euro look the car was originally intended to have, and equal or better performance. If I sell the 560SL before I'm dribbling food down my front and have to have my keys taken away, the 500SL will be the reason.
__________________
Craig Bethune '97 SL500, 40th anniversary edition '04 Olds Bravada (SWMBO's) '06 Lexus ES330 '89 560SL (sold) SL--Anything else is just a Mercedes. (Kudos to whoever said it first) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
This is obviously a matter of personal preference but I would not consider a U.S. market car with a V-8 and big bumpers - the front ends are too heavy and the bumpers too strange. This leaves only the euro cars - preferably the 280, preferably, for me, with a stick, 4 or 5 speed. A 300SL would be great but the 103 motor came out just as the gray market was dying - there's a grand total of about three 300SL 107 bodies in the U.S. Next choice would be a 500.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I have a 1987 560SL w/145k miles. It is POWERFUL, smooth and if the hardtop is tightly installed, somewhat quiet. Just took it on a 3600 mile cruise to Fla w/ my son and it was fun and most importantly, not a hickup, the whole trip. Others have complained about unreliablility and expensive to maintain, and I am sure that it is true, but so is my E320 and all the others that I have ever owned. As far as I am concerned, I will gladly spend whatever it takes to keep this car running great and looking sharp. Go with the 560SL and have a lot of fun!
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I bought a 1972 350SL (4.5). with 70,000 orig miles. A little old fashioned with roll up windows. Strong motor with no polution controls & small bumbers.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
I really don't think it makes a world of difference. All W107s are great cars. Just find the cleanest car you can for the best value and don't sweat the small stuff!
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
...these cars don't sip gas sparingly ya know...
__________________
2009 ML350 (106K) - Family vehicle 2001 CLK430 Cabriolet (80K) - Wife's car 2005 BMW 645CI (138K) - My daily driver 2016 Mustang (32K) - Daughter's car |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Is there a huge difference between the 380 and 560 in gas consumption?
I just completed a LONG trip, and tried various modes of driving and monitored the results; 1. Sport driving, not conserned at all with economy, resulted in about 14mpg. 2. Normal driving, not too conserned with slow accel from stop signs but not gunning it either- just moderate, normal stuff about 17mpg 3. Economic driving, really taking care to slowly take off from stop signs, pop it in nuetral and coasting for considerable distances when a stop sign/light is ahead. AND having the climate control in the ECONOMY position yeilded almost 20mpg. This was almost all highway miles, a little around town. Big variables with this experiment were; the cloth top/not hard top, some of the driving was with the top down, southern gas vs. new england gas, temperature and may be more stops and starts in NE because of tolls- vitually none down south. Anyway, my 560 is a weekend driver so I tend to drive it sporty and have fun. If this were my sole transport, I would be a lot more frugal with the gas pedal... |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
I love my 1973 450 sl ( small bumpers , powerful engine). I've got 185,000 miles on it and I drive it between Miami and New Orleans on a regular basis. Purrs like a fat cat all day long at 85mph. Fairly atrocious on the mileage though. I get about 16 if I 'm on my best behavior and not running the A/C. ( by the way, the very simple, old fashioned slide and knob controls are almost fool proof and keep my sl very comfortable and , thankfully, trouble free) I just put Amsoil synthetic motor oil in and have noticed that the car consistently runs about 10 degrees cooler so i expect to see some ( slightly) better mileage. Bottom line : You can't go wrong with a well cared for, older ( early 70s ) 350 or 450 sl. hey are as close to bullet proof as sls can be.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
I have also heard the 450SL was a good car. I love the slide controls for the heater and a/c, just straight-forward valving, no fancy automatic stuff that plagued all the 1980 model MBs I have owned. Even my 87' 560SL has had atleast two control modules, right now it is either giving hot air or vent, or a/c if the wheel is turned all the way to the coldest setting on the rotating wheel.
There is a good website that details the lineage of the SL which is OurSL.com. It was helpful for me when, last Fall, I was looking to purchase either a 380 or 560SL. Talks about horsepower, timing chain issues, improvements in braking, suspension etc. between the models. Great resource for someone looking to buy (not to mention the plethora of info found right here). |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
I would get a 230 or 280 SL...of the 113 variety. I LOVE that design.
Trades anyone?
__________________
Rick '85 380 SL (sold) '85 Carrera Flatnose '71 280 SL Signal Red/Cognac |
Bookmarks |
|
|