Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Mercedes-Benz SL Discussion Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-24-2004, 07:42 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 450
Which SL would you buy now???

Posting this in the SL forum, I'm assuming that the readers already have experience with at least one version of the SL line. Knowing what you do about them, and assuming that yours was stolen or something and you are now starting off with replacement $ and a clean garage, which model would you buy to replace it? Please limit the choice to the "older" SL's from the 380 to the 560 models.

I've had 6 of the diesel and gas sedans, and still have the 356 Porsche, but I'm kind of looking for an SL to round out the collection. Many thanks in advance for your sage advice.

__________________
'76 240D-Sold
'78 240D-Sold
'85 300 SD, 165K-Sold
'88 300 TE, 165K-Sold
'64 Porsche 356C Cabriolet- under restoration
'86 560SL 124K Miles-Sold
'94 320E Wagon, 74K Miles-128K Miles JUNKED
'06 E350 Wagon, 84K Miles
07 SL550, 14K Miles
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-25-2004, 05:38 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South Jersey/Phila
Posts: 276
HI Ron
I haved owned an 85-380SL since new. So I am partial to the 380
Must people like the 560 because of the bigger and faster engine.
But you can find some real nice 380's for less then 50% of the cost of the 560. Either car is super. Good luck finding the one you like. Happy driving.

Joe Moon
85-380SL-88k
94-E320Sedan-63k
95-E320Cabriolet-62k
__________________
joe moon/95Benzman
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-25-2004, 10:41 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Northumberland, UK
Posts: 1,294
I think a post-1985 Euro 500SL would best fit my needs; failing that a post-1985 300SL. The latter may not have the performance, but the engine is (I am told) a delight. Post-1985 because these cars for me have the best looks and also all the mod-cons as well as good rust proofing.
__________________
JJ Rodger
2013 G350 Bluetec
1999 SL 500
1993 E300 diesel T
1990 190
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-25-2004, 07:22 PM
ericdee's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 501
If I had to do it over again, I would go with a 560SL. More power and firmer ride.
__________________
Eric, 1983 500 SL
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-25-2004, 09:16 PM
benz-vettes
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I currently have a 380SL but I would choose either a 560SL or a 500SL any day. They are more powerful and tighter.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-25-2004, 09:57 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 766
I love my 560SL, and I'd do another one in a heartbeat--if it weren't that the 500SL can give you the non-automatic non-quixotic dual-temp AC system, the Euro look the car was originally intended to have, and equal or better performance. If I sell the 560SL before I'm dribbling food down my front and have to have my keys taken away, the 500SL will be the reason.
__________________
Craig Bethune

'97 SL500, 40th anniversary edition

'04 Olds Bravada (SWMBO's)
'06 Lexus ES330
'89 560SL (sold)


SL--Anything else is just a Mercedes.
(Kudos to whoever said it first)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-25-2004, 10:48 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,726
This is obviously a matter of personal preference but I would not consider a U.S. market car with a V-8 and big bumpers - the front ends are too heavy and the bumpers too strange. This leaves only the euro cars - preferably the 280, preferably, for me, with a stick, 4 or 5 speed. A 300SL would be great but the 103 motor came out just as the gray market was dying - there's a grand total of about three 300SL 107 bodies in the U.S. Next choice would be a 500.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-26-2004, 01:39 PM
73 280c
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: kittery me
Posts: 93
I have a 1987 560SL w/145k miles. It is POWERFUL, smooth and if the hardtop is tightly installed, somewhat quiet. Just took it on a 3600 mile cruise to Fla w/ my son and it was fun and most importantly, not a hickup, the whole trip. Others have complained about unreliablility and expensive to maintain, and I am sure that it is true, but so is my E320 and all the others that I have ever owned. As far as I am concerned, I will gladly spend whatever it takes to keep this car running great and looking sharp. Go with the 560SL and have a lot of fun!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-26-2004, 01:42 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Cheney, WA
Posts: 5
I bought a 1972 350SL (4.5). with 70,000 orig miles. A little old fashioned with roll up windows. Strong motor with no polution controls & small bumbers.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-26-2004, 01:43 PM
GermanStar's Avatar
Annelid wrangler
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Fountain Hills, AZ
Posts: 4,932
I really don't think it makes a world of difference. All W107s are great cars. Just find the cleanest car you can for the best value and don't sweat the small stuff!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-26-2004, 02:34 PM
G-Benz's Avatar
Razorback Soccer Dad
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Dallas/Fort-Worth
Posts: 5,711
Quote:
Originally posted by GermanStar
I really don't think it makes a world of difference. All W107s are great cars. Just find the cleanest car you can for the best value and don't sweat the small stuff!
Agreed! Although, considering pump gas prices nowadays, that might persuade you to opt for the smaller displacement models...

...these cars don't sip gas sparingly ya know...
__________________
2009 ML350 (106K) - Family vehicle
2001 CLK430 Cabriolet (80K) - Wife's car
2005 BMW 645CI (138K) - My daily driver
2016 Mustang (32K) - Daughter's car
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-29-2004, 01:13 PM
73 280c
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: kittery me
Posts: 93
Is there a huge difference between the 380 and 560 in gas consumption?

I just completed a LONG trip, and tried various modes of driving and monitored the results;

1. Sport driving, not conserned at all with economy, resulted in about 14mpg.

2. Normal driving, not too conserned with slow accel from stop signs but not gunning it either- just moderate, normal stuff about 17mpg

3. Economic driving, really taking care to slowly take off from stop signs, pop it in nuetral and coasting for considerable distances when a stop sign/light is ahead. AND having the climate control in the ECONOMY position yeilded almost 20mpg.

This was almost all highway miles, a little around town. Big variables with this experiment were; the cloth top/not hard top, some of the driving was with the top down, southern gas vs. new england gas, temperature and may be more stops and starts in NE because of tolls- vitually none down south.

Anyway, my 560 is a weekend driver so I tend to drive it sporty and have fun. If this were my sole transport, I would be a lot more frugal with the gas pedal...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-01-2004, 06:30 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 3
I love my 1973 450 sl ( small bumpers , powerful engine). I've got 185,000 miles on it and I drive it between Miami and New Orleans on a regular basis. Purrs like a fat cat all day long at 85mph. Fairly atrocious on the mileage though. I get about 16 if I 'm on my best behavior and not running the A/C. ( by the way, the very simple, old fashioned slide and knob controls are almost fool proof and keep my sl very comfortable and , thankfully, trouble free) I just put Amsoil synthetic motor oil in and have noticed that the car consistently runs about 10 degrees cooler so i expect to see some ( slightly) better mileage. Bottom line : You can't go wrong with a well cared for, older ( early 70s ) 350 or 450 sl. hey are as close to bullet proof as sls can be.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-02-2004, 10:38 AM
73 280c
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: kittery me
Posts: 93
I have also heard the 450SL was a good car. I love the slide controls for the heater and a/c, just straight-forward valving, no fancy automatic stuff that plagued all the 1980 model MBs I have owned. Even my 87' 560SL has had atleast two control modules, right now it is either giving hot air or vent, or a/c if the wheel is turned all the way to the coldest setting on the rotating wheel.

There is a good website that details the lineage of the SL which is OurSL.com. It was helpful for me when, last Fall, I was looking to purchase either a 380 or 560SL. Talks about horsepower, timing chain issues, improvements in braking, suspension etc. between the models. Great resource for someone looking to buy (not to mention the plethora of info found right here).
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-02-2004, 10:56 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Convent Station, NJ
Posts: 755
I would get a 230 or 280 SL...of the 113 variety. I LOVE that design.

Trades anyone?

__________________
Rick

'85 380 SL (sold)
'85 Carrera Flatnose
'71 280 SL Signal Red/Cognac
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page