Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help

Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes ShopForum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion > Off Topic Discussion - Politics and Religion

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-06-2017, 06:20 PM
Dudesky's Avatar
Non Compos Mentis
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Mar a Lago Estate
Posts: 14,600
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
The note Seems innocuous, even if she did not remember having accidentally used the wrong account twice.

Is it the tip of an iceberg or is it an ice cube? Will be interesting to see if Lynch "revises and clarifies" her statement under oath.
Maybe, but there's more to it than that. Lot of collusion between DOJ/MSM/DNC.

And she used the fictitious account for work related things after lying to Gowdy. Besides, what did Gowdy know and what was he getting at when he asked her that. I think its a fed records act violation.

Probably worth a look at the least.

Here's more:
__________________ Sent from my spare bedroom using an old fashioned keyboard.

Сделать Америку великой Снова

Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2017, 12:31 AM
Botnst's Avatar
What knockers!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 25,913
I admit without reservation: I am no authority on federal records law. My opinions are based solely on experience with having to implement and manage groups working within that framework. And on an embarrassingly low level.

In my opinion it is a GOOD THING that the rules, regulations and laws about public records are ambiguously defined. Pragmatically speaking, it's a good thing to have legal flexibility for back channel communication. Any system that is so rigidly defined that there is no possibly alternative line of communication or deliberation is as dead a system as Latin is a language.

Government policy makers and their subordinates need flexibility commiserate with their responsibility or you get a gov so inflexible that it dies of atherosclerosis, it can't handle pressure.

On the flip side you need congressional oversight that is wise enough to allow latitude yet true enough to constitutional principles that it holds gov accountable. IOW, don't criminalize or weaponize well-intentioned policy disagreements.

Sure, it's a balance. No moral person will always get it right. Thus, forebearance is a virtue to the republic.
'Government is like a baby:
An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and
no sense of responsibility at the other'
- Ronald Reagan
Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2011 Pelican Parts - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page