Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 12-07-2004, 06:49 PM
KirkVining's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,303
It was the WMD issue, and the WMD issue alone that manipulated enough votes in Congress to authorize this massive mistake. There is no way Congress would have authorized war otherwise. There was no popular political or poular support to take out Hussein just because he was Hussein. Bush knew this, hence the enormous WMD dog and phony show. This should be obvious to anyone.

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-07-2004, 07:40 PM
jjl jjl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 695
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkVining
It was the WMD issue, and the WMD issue alone that manipulated enough votes in Congress to authorize this massive mistake. There is no way Congress would have authorized war otherwise. There was no popular political or poular support to take out Hussein just because he was Hussein. Bush knew this, hence the enormous WMD dog and phony show. This should be obvious to anyone.
And this is how it was sold to the uk public - remember the '45 mins from attack' rubbish. The public did NOT believe it, but TB went ahead anyway. Marvelous.
__________________
'79 280SE
'87 560SEL
'83 280CE
'01 Nissan Micra
'98 VW Passat
'83 911 turbo
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-07-2004, 07:42 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkVining
It was the WMD issue, and the WMD issue alone that manipulated enough votes in Congress to authorize this massive mistake. There is no way Congress would have authorized war otherwise. There was no popular political or poular support to take out Hussein just because he was Hussein. Bush knew this, hence the enormous WMD dog and phony show. This should be obvious to anyone.
\


Argument #22.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-07-2004, 08:05 PM
MS Fowler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Littlestown PA ( 6 miles south of Gettysburg)
Posts: 2,278
Kirk,
You insist on making it sound like that imbecile Bush was able to hoodwink the entire congress into thinking there were WMDs when EVERYONE knew there were no WMDs. Doesn't each member of Congress who voted for the war share in the blame? Or is that only for republicans? Doesn't Congress have their own sources of information? Seems to me, I remember democrats falling all over themselves to vote to approve the war--they didn't want Bush and the republicans to get all the credit.
If Bush is the dummy you proclaim him to be, how was he able to make the democrats follow him. He can't be both the dummy AND the evil genius.
Of course, if getting back into power is the goal, then consistency of approach is not a requirement---just keep on blaming the republicans--in a while you will be right.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-07-2004, 08:07 PM
KirkVining's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst
\


Argument #22.
Empty Argument #1
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 12-07-2004, 08:13 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkVining
Empty Argument #1
Nah, "empty" isn't definitive. Lots of empty arguments out tehre and not every one fits this occasion. #22 on the other hand, refers to the Same Ol' $hit that this same tired-assed exchange brings everytime it is invoked.

By simply refering to the number, we can take a short-cut and MoveOn.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-07-2004, 08:16 PM
KirkVining's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by MS Fowler
Kirk,
You insist on making it sound like that imbecile Bush was able to hoodwink the entire congress into thinking there were WMDs when EVERYONE knew there were no WMDs. Doesn't each member of Congress who voted for the war share in the blame? Or is that only for republicans? Doesn't Congress have their own sources of information? Seems to me, I remember democrats falling all over themselves to vote to approve the war--they didn't want Bush and the republicans to get all the credit.
If Bush is the dummy you proclaim him to be, how was he able to make the democrats follow him. He can't be both the dummy AND the evil genius.
Of course, if getting back into power is the goal, then consistency of approach is not a requirement---just keep on blaming the republicans--in a while you will be right.
I do not think Bush is a "dummy" - he is a skillful propagandist. I was also more disappointed in the Dems who rolled over, more than anything else, but the person who wanted and engineered this war is George Bush - I sincerely doubt Congress would have given a second thought to Iraq otherwise. Bob Grahman also has stated that much of what swayed Congress was information provided in secret sessions that turned out later to be blatantly false.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-07-2004, 08:18 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,601
And Bob Graham, paragon of objectivity, was running for which high office?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-07-2004, 08:46 PM
KirkVining's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,303
Ad hominem attack, Empty Argument #2.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-07-2004, 09:49 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Charlotte, NCizzle
Posts: 238
wmd's aside, do you still think the war is pointless? Is freeing people under an inhumane dictator pointless? I wonder if thats what people in the us thought back in 1938 when hitler was just starting to gain power. I dought many people thought he would actually murder 6 million jews.
__________________
1993 400e
Charlotte
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-07-2004, 10:51 PM
Zeitgeist's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cascadia
Posts: 2,304
Yes, quite unequivocally a pointless waste of resources and human life. If you care to go gallivanting around the globe "rescueing" dudes and dames in "distress", then be my guest, but leave my tax dollars out of your fantasies. I'm afraid I've missed the Hitler analogy--what's the point...oh ya, it's must be a mustache thang.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-07-2004, 11:07 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Woolwich, Maine
Posts: 3,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by MS Fowler
Kirk,
You insist on making it sound like that imbecile Bush was able to hoodwink the entire congress into thinking there were WMDs when EVERYONE knew there were no WMDs. Doesn't each member of Congress who voted for the war share in the blame? Or is that only for republicans? Doesn't Congress have their own sources of information? Seems to me, I remember democrats falling all over themselves to vote to approve the war--they didn't want Bush and the republicans to get all the credit.
If Bush is the dummy you proclaim him to be, how was he able to make the democrats follow him. He can't be both the dummy AND the evil genius.
Of course, if getting back into power is the goal, then consistency of approach is not a requirement---just keep on blaming the republicans--in a while you will be right.
To understand what the Congress voted for you have to read the resolution. It was to authorize the President to go to war as a last resort to protect us from Saddam's WMD arsenal. The steps to ensuring going to war was the last resort were laid out, and subsequently ignored. The President misused the authority he was given. The Congress, Dems and Republicans alike, did not vote to go to war as you and many others suggest. The responsibility for that decision rests solely with the President, no matter how much anyone wants to spread it around now that the WMD story is so obviously a big smelly charade.

Google and read the resolution. It specifically prohibits going in and rescuing the Iraqi people from Saddam. By the Congressional Resolutions standing and declared to be in effect, it is not legal. Suggesting, after the fact, that saving the Iraqis from Saddam was sufficient reason is a bull***** story that all you bleeding heart conservative bullies are lapping up faster than it can be created.

And Bot is right, we have gone around and around on this. Probably more than 22 times. He likes the war though, so he is willing to overlook the fact that the President and his cronies lied to America to make it happen. Rather than discuss that though, he encapsulates it in a hermetically sealed wrapper of sarcasm called "Argument #22" and dismisses the facts.

All that aside, how the hell do we get out before it consumes us? Jim
__________________
Own:
1986 Euro 190E 2.3-16 (291,000 miles),
1998 E300D TurboDiesel, 231,000 miles -purchased with 45,000,
1988 300E 5-speed 252,000 miles,
1983 240D 4-speed, purchased w/136,000, now with 222,000 miles.
2009 ML320CDI Bluetec, 89,000 miles

Owned:
1971 220D (250,000 miles plus, sold to father-in-law),
1975 240D (245,000 miles - died of body rot),
1991 350SD (176,560 miles, weakest Benz I have owned),
1999 C230 Sport (45,400 miles),
1982 240D (321,000 miles, put to sleep)
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-07-2004, 11:26 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Charlotte, NCizzle
Posts: 238
the hitler analogy has to to with preemptive war
__________________
1993 400e
Charlotte
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-07-2004, 11:53 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 368
And Bot is right, we have gone around and around on this. Probably more than 22 times. He likes the war though, so he is willing to overlook the fact that the President and his cronies lied to America to make it happen. Rather than discuss that though, he encapsulates it in a hermetically sealed wrapper of sarcasm called "Argument #22" and dismisses the facts. JimSmith

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Exactly right. And in this way, he is not unlike millions of others who were had in this fiasco. It is never easy to admitt that you were had. The stock formula, when confronted with having been had, is to resort to sarcasm and misdirection to deflect attention from the gaping holes in your one's thinking.

Joe B.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-07-2004, 11:59 PM
shane's Avatar
nevermind
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 469
"But he tried to kill my daddy!" Favorite line of mine said by reigning POTUS. Hitler analogy is extreme but relevent. A man like Bush who evaded genuine military duty, failed consistently in business, is an alcholic and recovered dope fiend, and was saved by a televangelist preacher, now runs the country that granted him extra powerful powers to deal with the creators of 911. With that power this guy goes to war under proven and false reasons. Hell the UN did not even back him. All this for an attempt on daddy. Now if this doesn't sound ruthless I don't know what does.

__________________
The only thing we have to fear is fear itself!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page