|
|
|
|
View Poll Results: Should we forbid political threads/discussions from the forums | |||
Yes (waste of time, flames, nobody's gonna change opinions anyway etc...) | 35 | 44.87% | |
No (It's healthy, enterntaining, who knows, we they may change sides...) | 39 | 50.00% | |
I don't care.... | 4 | 5.13% | |
Voters: 78. You may not vote on this poll |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Lebenz, you and I have had a problem since day 1 on this forum, and it is not surprising you would use a thread like this as an opportunity to continue your personal attacks and your personal vendetta. Your real problem is the content of what I post, that is obvious because you advocate it be censored. Why do you even post on a public forum? They are meant to be an open forum for political ideas. If one person's political beliefs and how they express them bother you so much that you become that bitter, your the one with the problem.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
That would be a big mistake.
Let me tell a story, and then I will use it to illustrate my point.
I am a long-term participant on another web forum dedicated to wristwatches. Actually, several other people who regularly post on Mercedesshop are participants there. That forum -- which will go nameless -- used to have a terrific board called "The Water Cooler" where people were allowed to discuss anything and everything that did NOT relate to watches. Simply put, it was one of the most vibrant and interesting places on the web. The Water Cooler was shut down, however, because the moderators objected to the heated political discussions, as well as the personal attacks, etc. that some doofuses insisted on posting. So they killed the entire discussion board, and replaced it with a heavily policed, heavily censored "Lifestyles" forum where people discuss stereo equipement, acquariums, pots and pans, etc. These days, the replacement board is usually pretty boring and sterile -- sort of like a rip-roaring amusement park that has been bulldozed and replaced with a cornfield, complete with chirping crickets. When an interesting thread gets started, someone usually claims that it touches on one of the topics that is now forbidden -- like politics -- and the thread is then eliminated. The result? The most interesting people have drifted away, and the ENTIRE forum has suffered a decline in viewership and quality. Censorship kills. I think that if it is injected into this discussion board vis. politics, it will kill the quality and interest of the board. The reason is that virtually EVERYTHING has got a political aspect these days, and virtually ANY topic can be controversial. The solution is pretty clear, and it has to do with self-discipline. If the subject of a particular thread offends you, don't read it. And if you don't like personal attacks, don't post them. And if some troll attacks you, ignore them. Another thing is clear -- calling down the moderators to nuke particular people or topics is part of an all-too-typical trend in the U.S. these days where people do not tolerate differing viewpoints, and try to actually DESTROY those viewpoints as bad, offensive, illegal, traitorous, etc. rather than engaging them. Let's stay sane and not engage in that here. -- Bokonon |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
No way! I rather enjoy the debates.
__________________
Eric, 1983 500 SL |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I say--let the forum remain open, and tell those who want to turn it into a personal vendetta to find their entertainment elsewhere. Joe B. |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Gosh, if political debate were banned here, what would happen . . . political debate would have to be done in the dark back alleys in unsanitary conditions with who knows who participating in unfettered espousing. Or worse, someone might actually get involved in a political campaign! I worry for the republic if that happens.
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
We dont have debates here. We have flamefests and childish bickering. That is why people are leaving until after November.
__________________
http://comp.uark.edu/~dmgill/signature.jpg |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
I am not in favor of outlawing political discussion, but I think we need to face up to the fact that it has overwhelmed the Open Discussion forum to the point where if some newcomer asks a car question here, he doesn't have a prayer in hell of getting an answer. If he doesn't get an answer, most likely he never comes back, and thus never purchases parts, which is the main reason why Mercedesshop exists in the first place.
The solution is obvious, as others have already suggested. Make a separate forum for political arguments. The political types can beat each others brains out to their hearts content, and leave the Open Discussion Forum as the civilized place it used to be. If an innocent thread in Open Discussion turns into a political argument, simply move it to the Political Forum. Of course, on the new Political Discussion Forum, the same rules should apply regarding name calling, threats, etc. The obvious problem with setting up such a forum, of course, is where to find a mature and unbiased moderator stupid enough to accept a position which would undoubtedly subject himself to frequent heaping abuse.
__________________
Palangi 2004 C240 Wagon 203.261 Baby Benz 2008 ML320 CDI Highway Cruiser 2006 Toyota Prius, Saving the Planet @ 48 mpg 2000 F-150, Destroying the Planet @ 20 mpg TRUMP .......... WHITEHOUSE HILLARY .........JAILHOUSE BERNIE .......... NUTHOUSE 0BAMA .......... OUTHOUSE |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Let's have an exclusive pretty girls forum; or how about forums dedicated to car maintenance, diesels, tires, audio, and whether there should be other separate forums.
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
'83 240D with 617.952 and 2.88 '01 VW Beetle TDI '05 Jeep Liberty CRD '89 Toyota 4x4, needs 2L-T '78 280Z with L28ET - 12.86@110 Oil Burner Kartel #35 http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b1...oD/bioclip.jpg |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
TXBill Former owner of a few diesel MB cars 1998 Lexus ES 300 In Chicago We Trust |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
I believe a certain stringency must be applied to those who delight in attacking others personally.
Instead of profilling each other, why can't there be a simple standard as "Open Discussion Forum: We Can Agree to Disagree" I won't talk pish about your candidate/party, and you won't talk posh against my candidate. Not in a rudimentary fashion, at least. Why isn't that being enforced? The OD forum has been making me sick with the load of political threads. If somebody posts anything about any candidate in outright belligerence, just DON'T RESPOND! DON'T ENTERTAIN THE ISSUE! It's merely a box with a stick support, a carrot attached to a string being held by Elmer Fudd who is played by the thread initiator. "Huh-huh-huh-huh-huh-huh-huh". No matter what logic is presented, nothing will be taken as concern. Minds are closed, views are set, persuasion ain't going to happen. Us MB enthusiasts are too strong-minded for that crap be you a turd-eating arse, or a blimp with a trunk....Myself, the latter. |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
And he's the college boy
__________________
past MB rides: '68 220D '68 220D(another one) '67 230 '84 SD Current rides: '06 Lexus RX330 '93 Ford F-250 '96 Corvette '99 Polaris 700 RMK sled 2011 Polaris Assault '86 Yamaha TT350(good 'ol thumper) |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
http://comp.uark.edu/~dmgill/signature.jpg |
Bookmarks |
|
|