Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

View Poll Results: Should we forbid political threads/discussions from the forums
Yes (waste of time, flames, nobody's gonna change opinions anyway etc...) 35 44.87%
No (It's healthy, enterntaining, who knows, we they may change sides...) 39 50.00%
I don't care.... 4 5.13%
Voters: 78. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 08-27-2004, 12:30 PM
KirkVining's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,303
Lebenz, you and I have had a problem since day 1 on this forum, and it is not surprising you would use a thread like this as an opportunity to continue your personal attacks and your personal vendetta. Your real problem is the content of what I post, that is obvious because you advocate it be censored. Why do you even post on a public forum? They are meant to be an open forum for political ideas. If one person's political beliefs and how they express them bother you so much that you become that bitter, your the one with the problem.

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-27-2004, 12:52 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Centennial, Colorado
Posts: 38
That would be a big mistake.

Let me tell a story, and then I will use it to illustrate my point.

I am a long-term participant on another web forum dedicated to wristwatches. Actually, several other people who regularly post on Mercedesshop are participants there.

That forum -- which will go nameless -- used to have a terrific board called "The Water Cooler" where people were allowed to discuss anything and everything that did NOT relate to watches.

Simply put, it was one of the most vibrant and interesting places on the web.

The Water Cooler was shut down, however, because the moderators objected to the heated political discussions, as well as the personal attacks, etc. that some doofuses insisted on posting. So they killed the entire discussion board, and replaced it with a heavily policed, heavily censored "Lifestyles" forum where people discuss stereo equipement, acquariums, pots and pans, etc.

These days, the replacement board is usually pretty boring and sterile -- sort of like a rip-roaring amusement park that has been bulldozed and replaced with a cornfield, complete with chirping crickets. When an interesting thread gets started, someone usually claims that it touches on one of the topics that is now forbidden -- like politics -- and the thread is then eliminated.

The result? The most interesting people have drifted away, and the ENTIRE forum has suffered a decline in viewership and quality.

Censorship kills. I think that if it is injected into this discussion board vis. politics, it will kill the quality and interest of the board. The reason is that virtually EVERYTHING has got a political aspect these days, and virtually ANY topic can be controversial.

The solution is pretty clear, and it has to do with self-discipline. If the subject of a particular thread offends you, don't read it. And if you don't like personal attacks, don't post them. And if some troll attacks you, ignore them.

Another thing is clear -- calling down the moderators to nuke particular people or topics is part of an all-too-typical trend in the U.S. these days where people do not tolerate differing viewpoints, and try to actually DESTROY those viewpoints as bad, offensive, illegal, traitorous, etc. rather than engaging them. Let's stay sane and not engage in that here.

-- Bokonon
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-27-2004, 01:18 PM
ericdee's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 501
No way! I rather enjoy the debates.
__________________
Eric, 1983 500 SL
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-27-2004, 01:55 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lebenz
Thank you, Doctor, for taking the time to ask the membership!

I don’t see anything wrong with political threads. I do see a problem with one particular member -- KirkVinning. Not because of the inordinate volume of posts he makes. That is a prerogative. And there is no rule for the number of posts one may make. And definitely not because of his political alliance. That is a right. But due solely and exclusively to his rude, confrontational to the point of being harassing, arrogant, and indifferent nature. Were I a moderator, I would warn this individual to tone down the verbiage of his posts. He could make all the same points without the arrogance, harassment and rude nature. If he refused, I would edit his posts and warn him again. If he continued to refuse I would ban him.

Political threads aren’t the problem at all. One person is the motivator of the problem that is demonstrated in political threads. But again, there is nothing wrong with political threads themselves, nor is there anything wrong with discussing politics. If someone is using words to hurt anyone and everyone who disagrees with him, banning political threads will do nothing to solve it.

I have put him on ignore, and that works for me, but only after I remember to log on, so that ignore works. There are daily comments from many folks who find this person untenable, due to his above mentioned behaviors.
I think this post is outrageous. This poster doesn't like KV--so he uses this thread, which is supposed to be a survey of member thoughts, as an avenue upon which to express his displeasure. He implies that there are others (unnamed, of course) who agree with his extreme descriptions of KV's spirited offerings.

I say--let the forum remain open, and tell those who want to turn it into a personal vendetta to find their entertainment elsewhere.

Joe B.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-27-2004, 02:00 PM
MTI's Avatar
MTI MTI is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 10,626
Gosh, if political debate were banned here, what would happen . . . political debate would have to be done in the dark back alleys in unsanitary conditions with who knows who participating in unfettered espousing. Or worse, someone might actually get involved in a political campaign! I worry for the republic if that happens.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 08-27-2004, 02:14 PM
moparmike's Avatar
You will rue this day...
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 732
Quote:
Originally Posted by tkamiya
A full fledged debate is not in the taste of everyone.
Where is there a debate? The last thing we could call a "debate" was the gas-tax thread, and even then the word "debate" is a bit of a stretch on that thread.


We dont have debates here. We have flamefests and childish bickering. That is why people are leaving until after November.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-27-2004, 02:26 PM
Palangi's Avatar
L' Résistance
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Republique de Banana
Posts: 3,496
I am not in favor of outlawing political discussion, but I think we need to face up to the fact that it has overwhelmed the Open Discussion forum to the point where if some newcomer asks a car question here, he doesn't have a prayer in hell of getting an answer. If he doesn't get an answer, most likely he never comes back, and thus never purchases parts, which is the main reason why Mercedesshop exists in the first place.

The solution is obvious, as others have already suggested. Make a separate forum for political arguments. The political types can beat each others brains out to their hearts content, and leave the Open Discussion Forum as the civilized place it used to be. If an innocent thread in Open Discussion turns into a political argument, simply move it to the Political Forum. Of course, on the new Political Discussion Forum, the same rules should apply regarding name calling, threats, etc.

The obvious problem with setting up such a forum, of course, is where to find a mature and unbiased moderator stupid enough to accept a position which would undoubtedly subject himself to frequent heaping abuse.
__________________
Palangi

2004 C240 Wagon 203.261 Baby Benz
2008 ML320 CDI Highway Cruiser
2006 Toyota Prius, Saving the Planet @ 48 mpg
2000 F-150, Destroying the Planet @ 20 mpg



TRUMP .......... WHITEHOUSE
HILLARY .........JAILHOUSE
BERNIE .......... NUTHOUSE
0BAMA .......... OUTHOUSE
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-27-2004, 02:45 PM
MTI's Avatar
MTI MTI is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 10,626
Let's have an exclusive pretty girls forum; or how about forums dedicated to car maintenance, diesels, tires, audio, and whether there should be other separate forums.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-27-2004, 02:56 PM
GermanStar's Avatar
Annelid wrangler
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Fountain Hills, AZ
Posts: 4,932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Palangi
The obvious problem with setting up such a forum, of course, is where to find a mature and unbiased moderator stupid enough to accept a position which would undoubtedly subject himself to frequent heaping abuse.
I've heard that VD is willing to volunteer.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-27-2004, 03:45 PM
Old300D's Avatar
Biodiesel Fiend
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by moparmike
Where is there a debate? The last thing we could call a "debate" was the gas-tax thread, and even then the word "debate" is a bit of a stretch on that thread.


We dont have debates here. We have flamefests and childish bickering. That is why people are leaving until after November.
I completely disagree with this characterization. The open forum has some of the most mature discussions I've seen on any forum. If the arguments get hot and the insults are made, the offender usually gets called on it. Most folks here have thick enough skins to be able to take it.
__________________
'83 240D with 617.952 and 2.88
'01 VW Beetle TDI
'05 Jeep Liberty CRD
'89 Toyota 4x4, needs 2L-T
'78 280Z with L28ET - 12.86@110
Oil Burner Kartel #35

http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b1...oD/bioclip.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-27-2004, 03:50 PM
KirkVining's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTI
Gosh, if political debate were banned here, what would happen . . . political debate would have to be done in the dark back alleys in unsanitary conditions with who knows who participating in unfettered espousing. Or worse, someone might actually get involved in a political campaign! I worry for the republic if that happens.
Maybe we should allow debates only in the first two trimesters. In the final trimester, it will only be allowed if the debater has been a victim of rape or incest. And partial-debates will be banned.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 08-27-2004, 04:43 PM
Registered abuser
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 303
Quote:
Originally Posted by moparmike
Do you consider rising blood pressure, stress, and the creation of ulcers physically sick? I had 2 out of the three, and called a stop to it. Especially in the fights I really didnt have a dog in. I just couldnt stand to see someone bashing someone undeservedly.


I dont blog anymore either.
Those maladies are self-inflicted it sounds like. If you think reading gives you high blood pressure and ulcers, then for goodness sakes, stop reading!
__________________
TXBill



Former owner of a few diesel MB cars
1998 Lexus ES 300 In Chicago We Trust
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 08-27-2004, 05:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,220
I believe a certain stringency must be applied to those who delight in attacking others personally.

Instead of profilling each other, why can't there be a simple standard as "Open Discussion Forum: We Can Agree to Disagree"

I won't talk pish about your candidate/party, and you won't talk posh against my candidate. Not in a rudimentary fashion, at least. Why isn't that being enforced?

The OD forum has been making me sick with the load of political threads. If somebody posts anything about any candidate in outright belligerence, just DON'T RESPOND! DON'T ENTERTAIN THE ISSUE! It's merely a box with a stick support, a carrot attached to a string being held by Elmer Fudd who is played by the thread initiator. "Huh-huh-huh-huh-huh-huh-huh".

No matter what logic is presented, nothing will be taken as concern. Minds are closed, views are set, persuasion ain't going to happen. Us MB enthusiasts are too strong-minded for that crap be you a turd-eating arse, or a blimp with a trunk....Myself, the latter.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 08-27-2004, 05:42 PM
rickg's Avatar
User friendly
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Utah!!
Posts: 4,494
And he's the college boy
__________________
past MB rides:
'68 220D
'68 220D(another one)
'67 230
'84 SD
Current rides:
'06 Lexus RX330
'93 Ford F-250
'96 Corvette
'99 Polaris 700 RMK sled
2011 Polaris Assault
'86 Yamaha TT350(good 'ol thumper)
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 08-27-2004, 06:08 PM
moparmike's Avatar
You will rue this day...
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 732
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel4me
Those maladies are self-inflicted it sounds like. If you think reading gives you high blood pressure and ulcers, then for goodness sakes, stop reading!
Only reading here does that. And that is why I usually avoid the OD here.

Quote:
The open forum has some of the most mature discussions I've seen on any forum.
You need to get out more. IMO, Fark has more mature discussions than this place. YMMV.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page