Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 02-22-2006, 08:08 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by koop
When did the mob stop controlling the ports?
Guffaw! Nicely opined, Koop.



We need so perspective, here.

Operating a port facility is something that many cities contract. Like some cities contract garbage collection. If you think about it a moment, trash collection could be a lot more serious threat than the management of a port. See, the contractor doesn't have security responsibility or authority, that is retained by the city, state and federal gov. There are security checks of personnel and of facilities. The CG can conduct warrant-less inspections, so can customs. Cargo is inspected before it leaves the foreign port and before it is allowed to be unloaded by a variety of different folks from CG to USDA. Nor can the port contractor hire just anybody that tickles their fancy, they must go through the notoriously uh,... demanding Longshoreman's Union. Finally, cargo is unloaded at an area of low population density.

Now contrast that with garbage collection.
Security checks ... uh
Cargo inspection ... uh
Employee background checks ... uh

Plus, who notices a garbage truck? Who searches them? A terrorist team could hijack one and load it with explosives and drive it just about anywhere. Garbage trucks are practically invisible because nobody really wants to look at them.

Bot

  #32  
Old 02-22-2006, 10:44 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: S. Texas
Posts: 1,237
A point that no one has mentioned here is that before the British or UAE got the contract to manage the ports this contract was up for bids. Why didn't an American company bid low enough to get it?

All us comsumers would have raised 10 kinds of hell if the lowest bid by a foreign company had been turned down in favor of a much higher bid by an American company. This would have driven up the prices of all the products coming in through that port. Why did the British company get the bid? They got it because they were among the lowest and the kept it because they did what the bid called for. Where were the American companies while all this was going on?

The Brits sold their company because that is capitalism. The UAE bought the company because they reckoned they could make a profit. They had enough faith in the US and its economic future to invest and they will do their best to make it work because they can't afford to loose billions of bucks.

I lived in the UAE from 1980 to 1990. It is a country as none you have ever seen before. If you think the Jews are good businessmen you need to go to Dubai. But before you go you sew you pants pockets shut because you have never dealt with business men until you've tried to make a deal with a Dubian.

If you are worried about the UAE managing the ports check into how many foreign companies own how many US industries. Over 40% of the non-chain motels in the US are owned by the Patel family from India. I would venture to say that 80% of the non-chain motels in the US are owned by foreigners. Granted that these motels are not crucial to national security but the repersent a fair part of the national economy. And, again remember, every one of these American industries that is owned by a foreigner was for sale to an American before the foreigner bought it.
  #33  
Old 02-22-2006, 11:30 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 474
You guys are all wrong.

Read up on a fella named John Snow (US Treasury and CSX).

-Mike
__________________
1989 300CE - 269,000 km
1994 SL600 - 59,000 km
  #34  
Old 02-22-2006, 11:31 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rockville MD
Posts: 833
So a group of Arabs take down the WTC buildings in New York, and now a few years later its supposed to be OK to have an Arab firm run the port in that city. Interesting. I think I can understand the resentment, just by the symbolism alone.
__________________
1985 380SE Blue/Blue - 230,000 miles
2012 Subaru Forester 5-speed
2005 Toyota Sienna
2004 Chrysler Sebring convertible
1999 Toyota Tacoma
  #35  
Old 02-22-2006, 11:41 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,180
I think we need as many like minded allies as possible. If those allies are in the middle east, so much the better. There is no doubt a quid pro quo in the wings; perhaps in preparation for conflict with Iran?
  #36  
Old 02-22-2006, 11:42 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 474
Hello ????

John Snow.
__________________
1989 300CE - 269,000 km
1994 SL600 - 59,000 km
  #37  
Old 02-22-2006, 11:45 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,180
allies?
  #38  
Old 02-22-2006, 11:47 PM
*
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tiki Island Texas
Posts: 1,049
Name the US ports that are run by a US company? China Shipping Group is a state owned enterprise under the direct administration of the Chinese Central Government and has a huge terminal that they run in LA. Singapore and Taiwan also have sister terminals to their home ports that are under they own management, and I don't know but would expect the Japanese and Koreans do also.
The Patels are more of a group than family name by the way, but you're right they do have the “by the day – week or hour” market cornered.
Foreign investment in this country is the current grease to keep this machine going. I wouldn't be surprised to see a major top in equities right in through here and when we look back this could very well be the event that sets it off.
__________________
89 300E
79 240D
72 Westy
63 Bug sunroof
85 Jeep CJ7
86 Chevy 6.2l diesel PU

"The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
Marcus Aurelius
  #39  
Old 02-23-2006, 01:08 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 474
I'm looking forward to reading Back room deals by Johnny "insider" Snow.

It should be hitting bookshelves this time next year.
__________________
1989 300CE - 269,000 km
1994 SL600 - 59,000 km
  #40  
Old 02-23-2006, 02:50 AM
cmac2012's Avatar
Renaissances Dude
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 34,095
Quote:
Originally Posted by MS Fowler
I wonder about this.
Since "everyone" seems against it, and my first inclination is also to cautious,I feel compelled to ask," Is it really a bad idea?"
I am waiting to be convinced by something more substantive than the knee-jerk stuff I've heard up to this point.
Some misconceptions abound--
This is not a "sale" of the ports; it is a change in the stevadoring/management operation.
There appears to be no change in security. Is this true? How does this potential change automatically make it less safe?
Could not some good come out of having increased economic ties between an Arab country and the US?

waiting to be convinced.....
Whoa, what's this? Me and MS F sorta seeing eye to eye?

In some ways I'm troubled by this, but OTOH, reports are that this company does an excellent job of running ports. We keep saying we want Arabs to join the modern world and here these guys seem to be doing productive work with other nations in a calm, rational manner, and still people are getting all freaked out about it.

Yes, some of the 9/11 crew have ties in some way to the UAE but all the hijackers were based in the USA for a long time -- so was Timothy McVeigh -- and no one is asserting that our gub-mint had anything to do with them, nobody rational, that is.
__________________
1986 300SDL, 362K
1984 300D, 138K
  #41  
Old 02-23-2006, 03:00 AM
cmac2012's Avatar
Renaissances Dude
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 34,095
Quote:
Originally Posted by LaughingGravy
There's been a lot of talk about racism, etc. in giving control to Arabs vs. British.

Umm..why is any other country in control of our ports except us?

Do we control the ports of any other country of substance?

Who controls the ports of Japan or the borders of Germany?
Remember them?

Of all the things to farm out, jeesh.
There can only be one conclusion I can think of, after reading a bunch on this...

Those currently in charge are selling out to anybody for a quick buck, and **** the next generation.

When I think of the WWII generation and all they fought and died for,the idea of any other entity besides the US gov't. operating our ports makes me ill.

What? It would cost too much to have the US gov't run them? C'mon!

When was it decided it would be a good idea to have anyone else operate our ports?

Are we in the US incapable of controlling our own ports that it needs to be done by someone else? At what cost?

What's next? Our ports become sovereign territory of another country?

Back to my header title...if I am missing something big here in concept, please let me know.
You've stated excellently my misgivings on the topic. I'm torn. It does seem shaky in many ways.

Funny thing though, we and the Brits operated ports around the world for fun and profit for years, doing so right now in Iraq, and now we decide we don't like the idea of another nation running our ports.

Hmmm..... what's good for the goose is not good for the gander after all.
__________________
1986 300SDL, 362K
1984 300D, 138K
  #42  
Old 02-23-2006, 03:07 AM
cmac2012's Avatar
Renaissances Dude
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 34,095
Quote:
Originally Posted by crash9
Name the US ports that are run by a US company? China Shipping Group is a state owned enterprise under the direct administration of the Chinese Central Government and has a huge terminal that they run in LA. Singapore and Taiwan also have sister terminals to their home ports that are under they own management, and I don't know but would expect the Japanese and Koreans do also.
The Patels are more of a group than family name by the way, but you're right they do have the “by the day – week or hour” market cornered.
Foreign investment in this country is the current grease to keep this machine going. I wouldn't be surprised to see a major top in equities right in through here and when we look back this could very well be the event that sets it off.
This is likely the wave of the future, given our big imbalance in trade. All those American dollars we're shipping abroad want to come back and buy some bigger action.

We might be on our way to becoming the first truly international country. A bit freaky....
__________________
1986 300SDL, 362K
1984 300D, 138K
  #43  
Old 02-23-2006, 08:51 AM
MS Fowler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Littlestown PA ( 6 miles south of Gettysburg)
Posts: 2,278
Isn't there a lot of racism in the arguments against this deal?
One of the 9-11 terrorists was from UAE; therefore noone from the UAE is to be trusted. Replace the "UAE" with "Jew" or "black" and see if it doesn't stir some sentiments.
Timothy McVeigh was a white guy--are ALL white guys terrorists?
Anyone who judges by the group is a fool. ( except democrats--that are all evil...)
  #44  
Old 02-23-2006, 09:30 AM
dannym's Avatar
I'm not here
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Deltona, Florida
Posts: 2,360
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmac2012
You've stated excellently my misgivings on the topic. I'm torn. It does seem shaky in many ways.

Funny thing though, we and the Brits operated ports around the world for fun and profit for years, doing so right now in Iraq, and now we decide we don't like the idea of another nation running our ports.

Hmmm..... what's good for the goose is not good for the gander after all.
That's rediculous. We don't pose a terrorist threat to anybody. We don't sneak attack. We invade in force.

Danny
__________________
1984 300SD Turbo Diesel 150,000 miles

OBK member #23

(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination
  #45  
Old 02-23-2006, 01:03 PM
*
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tiki Island Texas
Posts: 1,049
Quote:
Originally Posted by MS Fowler
Isn't there a lot of racism in the arguments against this deal?
One of the 9-11 terrorists was from UAE; therefore noone from the UAE is to be trusted. Replace the "UAE" with "Jew" or "black" and see if it doesn't stir some sentiments.
Timothy McVeigh was a white guy--are ALL white guys terrorists?
Anyone who judges by the group is a fool. ( except democrats--that are all evil...)
Probably – for the average guy on the street. The politicians see that to take a real look at this is suicidal so it's universal, but what Bush is saying is very correct. Mideasterners are grasping to believe that we're not anti- Muslim/Arab, but realize the terrorists don't represent all of them. With all of the current protests going on and now with this slam I think we're seeing that it could go that way though. My daughter took a week RR in Dubai from her KBR job in Baghdad this week and says nothing seems any different. Dubai and Qatar are fab places if you're into extravagance. She is.
We need all the friends we can get right now and this over-reaction is not good for any of us in the long run.
Dubai and Bahrain were always rich, before oil was in the picture. Dubai smuggled gold into India and Bahrain was and is a center for natural pearls. Dubai is a trade center and will follow the money, and in that regard can never be counted on. They're “what have you done for me lately” kind of folks, but just the same we don't want them to shun investment here. Little things can really shift the trends of things, and our great strength is that money feels safe here. If that changes it won't be pretty. The only reason we did not have a true hyperinflation in the seventies was because we were the worlds banker and had the ultimate bonding capacity. Should that change you may discover that the guy holding the paper on your house doesn't speak very good English.

__________________
89 300E
79 240D
72 Westy
63 Bug sunroof
85 Jeep CJ7
86 Chevy 6.2l diesel PU

"The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
Marcus Aurelius
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page