Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-12-2006, 04:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 190
1997 E320 replacement.

I have a 1997 E320 that I am replacing with a newer vehicle. I am having a hard time deciding between getting a newer 2000-2001 E55 or 2003-newer E320. I have always loved the E55 but am having trouble deciding if I should go for a W211 or stay with the W210.

Thanks,
Steve

__________________
1997 E320
1990 Nissan 300ZX Twin Turbo (Stage X+)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-12-2006, 06:56 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Milford, DE
Posts: 1,558
I don't have a lot of seat time in the W211 chassis but my initial impression is that is that the newer E-class is a considerable advance over the W210 in the area of chassis dynamics and driving feel. It almost feels like a BMW 5 series - which seems to be the prepetual gold standard for a sport sedan.

I'm not sure how the W211 would compare to the W210 in the area of reliability - both are too complex for the average DIY'er to handle without lots of special tools and training.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-12-2006, 07:42 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
The W211 is a nice car. I want to get one in a couple of years, maybe end of next year.

W210 is pretty simple to wrench on. The interior comes apart so easy! I swear who ever built that car had a lot of time on the W126 and improved the interior design.

Never worked on a W211, but its a MB so I'm not worried.
__________________
1999 SL500
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-12-2006, 08:37 PM
Ali Al-Chalabi's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,837
I think the W210 is a little more of a driver's car than the W211. The W211 has things such as overboosted rack and pinion steering and sensotronic brakes (which I don't care much for).

Go with the E55, you probably won't be disappointed.
__________________
Ali Al-Chalabi

2001 CLK55
1999 Dodge Ram 2500 Cummins Diesel
2002 Harley-Davidson Fatboy
Merlin Extralight w/ Campy Record
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-12-2006, 09:07 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,263
Or you could go with the CDI. While not the powerhouse of the 55, it's supposedly quite fast, and gets just plain awesome fuel economy. Over a 700 mile range on a tank of fuel.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-12-2006, 10:36 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
Didn't MB dump those brakes and go back to a normal braking system in 2005 or 06?
__________________
1999 SL500
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-13-2006, 12:14 AM
iwrock's Avatar
roflmonster
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hella NorCal
Posts: 3,313
HAHAH!!!

My bosses daily driver E500 is cool. The Airmatic and the Active Body Control make it one of the best handling sedans I have driven. Although, it doesn't have they power that his E55 does, it still does like to get up and go. However, the E320 only had airmatic, and not the Active Body Control. I am willing to venture that his E500 and his E55 are some of the best handling Mercedes I have ever driven.

All in all, it is a fairly easy car to work on. Everything is straightforward, and I would maintain it myself. Although the electronics do tend to get harry!!! I help him with the regular maintainence, such as oil changes, and just routien maintainence.

If I were a DIY looking for a newer Mercedes, I would probibally just go with a 2000-2002 E55. Less complicated in the longrun. Plus, with the E55 you have a whole lot more aftermarket options open to you.

And as it was once said, there is no replacement for displacement...
__________________
-Justin

91 560 SEC AMG - other dogs dd
01 Honda S2000 - dogs dd
07 MB ML320 CDI - dd
16 Lexus IS250 - wifes dd

it's automatic.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-21-2006, 09:43 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 190
I think I have decided to go with the E55. More smiles per hour. I have a set of 18X8.5 and 18X10 Carlsson 1/6 on my E320. Will they bolt on the E55? Any problem areas on the E55 I should look our for?

Thanks for all of your input.
Steve
__________________
1997 E320
1990 Nissan 300ZX Twin Turbo (Stage X+)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-23-2006, 05:30 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 0
What are your goals for the car? Answer that and the rest of the issues become simpler if you can be honest with yourself.

If you can get a reasonably short/stiff sidwall and tire/wheel size remember that every pound of unsprung weight equals about 10 lbs of curb weight. Thus a shorter sidwall (19's or 20's don't necessarily help handling or performance).

The CDI has its own issues. Certainly a very tempting choice! Especailly with Kleeman or silimilar upgrades. Again, up to your preferences.

I will say "careful" with the 1997 model year....older tech engine management and newer (at the time) tech transmission management don't always get on the same page which puts the durability of the motor vs the durability of the transmission. Ususally the engine wins first. Shift manually or buy a later/earlier model year. THere are too many excellent opions either way.

Hate mail too....Botor
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-23-2006, 05:50 AM
Jim B.'s Avatar
Who's flying this thing ?
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: N. California./ N. Nevada
Posts: 3,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve190E 2.3
I think I have decided to go with the E55. More smiles per hour. I have a set of 18X8.5 and 18X10 Carlsson 1/6 on my E320. Will they bolt on the E55? Any problem areas on the E55 I should look our for?

Thanks for all of your input.
Steve
One *BIG* problem with the E55 to watch out for: Flashing red lights in the rear view mirror. You stand warned!

Truly a scary fast, comfortable ride, an excellent choice. I only tested one once, and I just loved it.
__________________
1991 560 SEC AMG, 199k <---- 300 hp 10:1 ECE euro HV ...

1995 E 420, 170k "The Red Plum" (sold)

2015 BMW 535i xdrive awd Stage 1 DINAN, 6k, <----364 hp

1967 Mercury Cougar, 49k

2013 Jaguar XF, 20k <----340 hp Supercharged, All Wheel Drive (sold)
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-23-2006, 09:36 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: North America
Posts: 552
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve190E 2.3
I think I have decided to go with the E55. More smiles per hour. I have a set of 18X8.5 and 18X10 Carlsson 1/6 on my E320. Will they bolt on the E55? Any problem areas on the E55 I should look our for?
Steve
Yep, they will bolt right up. There are no blaring issues with the 210 E55 but they do have some items that will fail. The MAF's fail every 50,000 to 60,000 miles but that's a Bosch issue. Rear window regulators fail but it's fairly cheap part and extremely easy to replace yourself. The dash's tend to crack around the airbag and defrost vents but that happens on pretty much all of the 210's. The brake switche's have been known to fail from time to time but it is a cheap part that any DIYer can do in 10 minutes.

There is one serious issue. If the car has been driven in salty road conditions, the front strut towers have been known to fail due to rust. You can have the dealership look at that and they should fix it free of charge if needed.

The 210 E55 is a great car. I drive mine day in and day out and have over 100,000 miles. It has been extremely dependable and very easy to work on. I'd say it is easier to work on than my 126 SEC. Not to mention, I'd say the E55 was more reliable and cheaper to operate than the 126 too.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-23-2006, 04:43 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: North America
Posts: 552
Yep, forgot about the motor mounts. It was another DIY project that wasn't too terribly difficult.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-15-2006, 03:04 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 190
I purchased a 2001 E55 yesterday. The more time I spend in the car the more differences I notice from the 1997 E320. I am very happy with my decision and thanks for all your input.

Steve
__________________
1997 E320
1990 Nissan 300ZX Twin Turbo (Stage X+)
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-16-2006, 06:33 PM
iwrock's Avatar
roflmonster
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hella NorCal
Posts: 3,313
Hey, congrats!!!! Now, get that V1 hardwired, and watch out for those flashing lights in the mirror!!

__________________
-Justin

91 560 SEC AMG - other dogs dd
01 Honda S2000 - dogs dd
07 MB ML320 CDI - dd
16 Lexus IS250 - wifes dd

it's automatic.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page