|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
BMW beats Mercedes
http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=mercedes&word2=bmw
here's a good one http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=sex&word2=abstinence
__________________
You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows - Robert A. Zimmerman Last edited by Kuan; 04-01-2007 at 10:21 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Hahahaha. Thats cool.
Too bad Mercedes was beat tho.
__________________
-Justin 91 560 SEC AMG - other dogs dd 01 Honda S2000 - dogs dd 07 MB ML320 CDI - dd 16 Lexus IS250 - wifes dd it's automatic. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Just do this http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=mb&word2=bmw If we're going to use the acronyms, lets be fair and call an MB an MB, and a BMW a BMW. Bye, Bye, Bimmer.... http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=benz&word2=bimmer |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Yes the poll results are in, and its official. MB is clearly better then BMW, no contest.
__________________
1999 SL500 1969 280SE 2023 Ram 1500 2007 Tiara 3200 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
In the May "Car and Driver", they compared SUVs.
They actually rated the X5 higher than the ML. I did notice that the review on the X5 stated that the base model was "under powered". STOP!! I wouldn't buy a very expensive SUV that lacked HP no matter what other goodies it offered. Car and Driver is, and will always be, a BMW slanted magazine. :fork_off: |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
They said that the E63 was better than the M5!!!!! Woot. They said it actually handled well for a "sport sedan".
__________________
-Justin 91 560 SEC AMG - other dogs dd 01 Honda S2000 - dogs dd 07 MB ML320 CDI - dd 16 Lexus IS250 - wifes dd it's automatic. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
They didn't test the X5 with the 4.4, that one moves!
__________________
1999 SL500 1969 280SE 2023 Ram 1500 2007 Tiara 3200 |
Bookmarks |
|
|