|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
What about an old RX-7?
My son the realtor has a house he sold (to my daughter) which has an old red faded RX-7 with some flat tires. I just glanced at it but it does not look rusty, the interior is intact and it is a stick.
I have no idea what year...80 something? I think I can get it pretty cheaply because the sellers don't really have a place for it and don't really want to move it again. I am wondering what the chances are of putting some decent tires on it and some konis and using it for autocross. Any opinions? Tom W
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC] ..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
those RX-7's are a blast to drive.. fast as hell when you tune them right.. But the apex seals are the known failure point. The newer RX-7's (more streamlined) are track beasts. the older can be as well. They are loud too..
might want to get some coil overs and thicker sway bars and upgrade the brakes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I had a teacher in high school who was an amateur racer, and raced the heck out of these RX-7's.
I have heard nothing but great things about these cars. There ought to be a pretty active community of guys who still race these cars.
__________________
Paul S. 2001 E430, Bourdeaux Red, Oyster interior. 79,200 miles. 1973 280SE 4.5, 170,000 miles. 568 Signal Red, Black MB Tex. "The Red Baron". |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
big community.. you will pick out the rice boi's easily..
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
From what I've heard about them, they need apex seals occasionally. The older ones might need them every 100K. You do not want to wait until a seal snags a port.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
their MPG is pretty crappy also.. but probably in the neighbor hood of low 20's
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Tom do you really need another car?
__________________
1991 560 SEC AMG, 199k <---- 300 hp 10:1 ECE euro HV ... 1995 E 420, 170k "The Red Plum" (sold) 2015 BMW 535i xdrive awd Stage 1 DINAN, 6k, <----364 hp 1967 Mercury Cougar, 49k 2013 Jaguar XF, 20k <----340 hp Supercharged, All Wheel Drive (sold) |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Of course not.
Hey! You sound like my wife! You know, at the sniff of a good deal the old antenna go up. My subconscience starts saying...I bet I could get that thing running. Tom W
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC] ..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Excellent fun to drive car with great handling, if you maintain them right, they can last a while. The new RX-8 is a phenomenally good yet understated sports car available. The beauty of a rotary engine is its near constant torque, at any RPM there is torque available.
__________________
99 Gurkha with OM616 IDI turbo 2015 Gurkha with OM616 DI turbo 2014 Rexton W with OM612 VGT |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Take a look at rx7club.com. Lots of info on all 3 generations of RX-7s. They have several quirks, and apex seals give you no warning of their imminent demise. And you don't just "replace a seal" when they break. They usually take the rotor housing with them. It requires a full teardown of the engine to the tune of $1200+ if you do it yourself. Of course that gives you the opportunity to upgrade various bits and pieces while you are in there. The second gen, which I had, is very well balanced and corners like a slot car. You don't want to drive it in the snow, at all.
__________________
1985 380SE Blue/Blue - 230,000 miles 2012 Subaru Forester 5-speed 2005 Toyota Sienna 2004 Chrysler Sebring convertible 1999 Toyota Tacoma |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
A friend of mine had a pair of first-gen RX7's. Great handlers, as they're essentially front mid engine. Not a lot of torque, so you had to wind them a bit if you wanted to hustle, but very smooth engines. Watch for rust.
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
The engines consume oil by their nature so if the previous owner didn't check it every once in a while there is a chance the engine is not in great shape.
__________________
1985 CA 300D Turbo , 213K mi |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
I had the second generation model ('87) with a turbo. It was the best sports car I ever owned, and beat everything it came up against (including 944 turbos and 911's). Power to weight was phenomenal. Reliability was perfect in 60K miles.
Each wankel rotor is essentially a two-stroke triple, so it does what you would expect from such an engine: rev happily, drink gas, and need top-end lubrication. From what I've read - check wikipedia for wankels - the apex seal issue was limited to the 70's.
__________________
Prost! |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Neat little cars and the rotary engines have always fascinated me. It would probably make a great autocross car.
__________________
1980 300TD-China Blue/Blue MBTex-2nd Owner, 107K (Alt Blau) OBK #15 '06 Chevy Tahoe Z71 (for the wife & 4 kids, current mule) '03 Honda Odyssey (son #1's ride, reluctantly) '99 GMC Suburban (255K+ miles, semi-retired mule) 21' SeaRay Seville (summer escape pod) |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
I owned a 1971 RX2 & a 1975 rx3 ....rev happy, no torque, eats fuel like a small block.
I overhauled the RX2 in 1976 because of a side O ring seal going bad (blown head gasket) Nobody knew anything about these motors back then and i was 19 yo, so I buy the only book avalible at that time & step by step overhauled the motor. Man, was I suprised when it started and ran! It was facinating to see how the rotors worked in the elliptical chamber; It blows your mind watching it. ( kind of like a spiral graph) The motor is comparable to a 6 cylinder with no firing overlap. Very little recipricating mass.
__________________
"Our Lady of Blessed Acceleration... don't Fail Us Now" |
Bookmarks |
|
|